Florida Statute 219.1 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XIV
TAXATION AND FINANCE

Chapter 219
COUNTY PUBLIC MONEY, HANDLING BY STATE AND COUNTY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 219.01

219.01 Definitions.—The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this act, shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning.

(1) For the purposes of this act, the term “officer” shall be taken to mean a county officer, including an officer whose authority is ordinarily confined to a district within a county, whose duties require or authorize him or her to collect public money; the term “officer” shall not include any board or commission or any member thereof acting as such.

(2) The term “public money” shall be taken to mean and include all money collected by a county officer which he or she is required or authorized by law, as such county officer, to collect, and underpayments, overpayments, partial payments and deposits of such money, except the county officer’s salary when his or her sole compensation is provided by such salary.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-349; s. 1181, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 219.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 219.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 219.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 219.01

Total Results: 23

Alexander v. Fulton County

207 F.3d 1303, 46 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 347, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5803, 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,046, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 858

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 30, 2000 | Docket: 395712

Cited 265 times | Published

See, e.g., Restatement (Second) of Agency § 219(1) (1958); see also Faragher v. City of Boca

Barbara Sparks v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.

830 F.2d 1554, 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 160, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13969, 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,493

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 20, 1987 | Docket: 1079527

Cited 172 times | Published

their employment,” Restatement (Second) of Agency, § 219(1), the district court determined that Pilot Freight

LaRoche v. Denny's, Inc.

62 F. Supp. 2d 1366, 1999 WL 669545

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1999 | Docket: 2282875

Cited 124 times | Published

liable for that wrongful conduct. Pursuant to Section 219(1) of the Restatement (Second) of Agency, an employer

Region 8 Forest Service Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock

993 F.2d 800, 23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20151, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14762

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1993 | Docket: 1133670

Cited 110 times | Published

annually. See 16 U.S.C.A. § 1604(e); 36 C.F.R. § 219.1 (1992). After the Woodpecker Chapter was approved

Sierra Club v. Martin

168 F.3d 1, 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20569, 48 ERC (BNA) 1251, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 2508

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 587128

Cited 50 times | Published

plans for the National Forest System," 36 C.F.R. § 219.1, and the regulations make repeated reference to

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

111 F.3d 1530

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 28, 1997 | Docket: 484119

Cited 50 times | Published

subordinate. See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 219(1), (2)(c), (2)(d). 16 Subsequent

Wilderness Society v. Alcock

83 F.3d 386, 26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21401, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11704, 1996 WL 229229

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 1996 | Docket: 1118648

Cited 44 times | Published

suitability of lands for resource management.” 36 C.F.R. § 219.1(b). In developing a LRMP, the Secretary must consider:

Scelta v. Delicatessen Support Services, Inc.

57 F. Supp. 2d 1327, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9769, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 931, 1999 WL 455394

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1999 | Docket: 2289153

Cited 23 times | Published

must look to Section 219(1) of the Restatement (Second) of Agency (1957). See id. Section 219(1) of the Restatement

Beckwith v. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc.

374 So. 2d 951

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1979 | Docket: 2521734

Cited 11 times | Published

National Bank, 206 So.2d 436 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968); § 219.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1977). *953 The receiver states

Sierra Club v. Martin

168 F.3d 1, 1999 WL 77208

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 395114

Cited 7 times | Published

plans for the National Forest System,” 36 C.F.R. § 219.1, and the regulations make repeated reference to

Alexander v. Fulton County

207 F.3d 1303

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 30, 2000 | Docket: 484230

Cited 6 times | Published

correct. See, e.g., Restatement (Second) of Agency § 219(1) (1958); see also Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Laroche v. Denny's Inc.

62 F. Supp. 2d 1375, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13063, 1999 WL 669550

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1999 | Docket: 2282732

Cited 6 times | Published

well as federal and Florida law. Pursuant to Section 219(1)(d) of the Restatement (Second) of Agency, the

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

76 F.3d 1155, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1834, 68 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,000, 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1590

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 8, 1996 | Docket: 66438

Cited 6 times | Published

at 1558 (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 219(1)). An employer also is directly liable, under agency

Region 8 Forest Service Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock

993 F.2d 800, 1993 WL 185648

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 21, 1993 | Docket: 66283962

Cited 5 times | Published

annually. See 16 U.S.C.A. § 1604(e); 36 C.F.R. § 219.1 (1992). After the Woodpecker Chapter was approved

Joan E. Friedenberg v. School Board of Palm Beach County

911 F.3d 1084

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8442425

Cited 2 times | Published

109 S.Ct. 1402 (quoting 49 C.F.R. § 219.1 (a) (1987) ). These employees "discharge[d]

Joan E. Friedenberg v. School Board of Palm Beach County

911 F.3d 1084

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 20, 2018 | Docket: 8442425

Cited 2 times | Published

109 S.Ct. 1402 (quoting 49 C.F.R. § 219.1 (a) (1987) ). These employees "discharge[d]

Sierra Club v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 18, 1999 | Docket: 395115

Published

plans for the National Forest System,” 36 C.F.R. § 219.1, and the regulations make repeated reference to

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

111 F.3d 1530, 1997 WL 204926

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 15, 1997 | Docket: 64031356

Published

believe the City of Boca Raton is liable under § 219(1) for the hostile environment created by Terry and

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

76 F.3d 1155

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 8, 1996 | Docket: 73212

Published

at 1558 (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 219(1)). An employer also is directly liable, under

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

76 F.3d 1155

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 8, 1996 | Docket: 235738

Published

See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 219(1), (2)(c), (2)(d). Subsequent to Meritor

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

76 F.3d 1155

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 8, 1996 | Docket: 235739

Published

subordinate. See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 219(1), (2)(c), (2)(d). Subsequent to Meritor

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 26, 1979 | Docket: 3257262

Published

money' within the purview of Ch. 219, F. S. Section 219.01(2) defines the term `public money' to mean

Haslett v. State

225 So. 2d 186, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 1969 | Docket: 64510692

Published

funds. Section 1(1) of the 1957 Act, now F.S. § 219.01(1), F.S.A., defines the term “offi*190cer” to