Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 9
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-04-05
Citation: 756 So. 2d 188, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4196, 2000 WL 346141
Snippet: note the existence of Putnam v. Putnam, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517 (1939), where the Florida Supreme Court
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-02-07
Citation: 593 So. 2d 1131, 1992 WL 20015
Snippet: We recognize that in Putnam v. Putnam, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517 (1939), the supreme court affirmed a trial
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-03-10
Citation: 380 So. 2d 1143, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16076
Snippet: (Fla. 1st DCA 1960); Putnam v. Putnam, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517 (1939). The rule applied with respect
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-03-28
Citation: 368 So. 2d 1356
Snippet: So.2d 881 (1946) and Putnam v. Putnam, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517 (1939) in support of its decision. In
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-06-08
Citation: 359 So. 2d 62
Snippet: to that point. (See Putnam v. Putnam, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517 (1939); Cortina v. Cortina, 108 So.2d
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-05-03
Citation: 198 So. 2d 348
Snippet: 108 So.2d 63; Putnam v. Putnam, 1939, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517; and Satterfield v. Satterfield, Fla.
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-12-07
Citation: 147 So. 2d 545
Snippet: 18 So.2d 902; Putnam v. Putnam, 1939, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517. In Satterfield v. Satterfield, Fla. 1949
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-02-04
Citation: 118 So. 2d 106
Snippet: In the case of Putnam v. Putnam, 1939, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517, 518, the decree of the court as modified
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-12-19
Citation: 108 So. 2d 63
Snippet: L.R. 197; and Putnam v. Putnam, 1939, 136 Fla. 220, 186 So. 517. It should go without saying that the