220.63

Franchise tax imposed on banks and savings associations.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

220.63 Franchise tax imposed on banks and savings associations.—

(1) A franchise tax measured by net income is hereby imposed on every bank and savings association for each taxable year commencing on or after January 1, 1973.

(2)(a) The tax imposed by this section shall be an amount equal to 51/2 percent of the franchise tax base of the bank or savings association for the taxable year, except as provided in paragraph (b).

(b) The tax rate imposed in paragraph (a) shall be adjusted as provided in s. 220.1105.

(3) For purposes of this part, the franchise tax base shall be adjusted federal income, as defined in s. 220.13, apportioned to this state, plus nonbusiness income allocated to this state pursuant to s. 220.16, less the deduction allowed in subsection (5) and less $50,000.

(4) Nothing contained in this part shall be construed to prohibit a savings association, in computing its franchise tax base, from claiming the maximum deduction allowed under s. 593 of the Internal Revenue Code.

(5) There shall be allowed as a deduction from adjusted federal income, to the extent not deductible in determining federal taxable income or subtracted pursuant to s. 220.13(1)(b)2., the eligible net income of an international banking facility determined as follows:

(a) The “eligible net income of an international banking facility” is the amount remaining after subtracting from the eligible gross income the applicable expenses.

(b) The “eligible gross income” is the gross income derived by an international banking facility from:

1. Making, arranging for, placing, or servicing loans to foreign persons, provided, however, that in the case of a foreign person which is an individual, a foreign branch of a domestic corporation (other than a bank or savings association), or a foreign corporation or a foreign partnership which is 80 percent or more owned or controlled, either directly or indirectly, by one or more domestic corporations (other than banks or savings associations), domestic partnerships, or resident individuals, substantially all the proceeds of the loan are for use outside the United States;

2. Making or placing deposits with foreign persons which are banks or savings associations or foreign branches of banks or savings associations, including foreign subsidiaries or foreign branches of the taxpayer, or with other international banking facilities; or

3. Entering into foreign exchange trading or hedging transactions in connection with the activities described in this paragraph.

However, the term “eligible gross income” does not include any amount derived by an international banking facility from making, arranging for, placing, or servicing loans or making or placing deposits if the loans or deposits of funds are secured by mortgages, deeds of trust, or other liens upon real property located in this state.

(c) The “applicable expenses” are any expenses or other deductions attributable, directly or indirectly, to the eligible gross income described in paragraph (b).

History.—s. 8, ch. 72-278; s. 2, ch. 73-152; s. 6, ch. 81-179; s. 9, ch. 83-349; ss. 8, 12, 22, ch. 84-549; s. 102, ch. 91-112; s. 6, ch. 2011-229; s. 11, ch. 2012-32; s. 24, ch. 2016-10; s. 6, ch. 2018-119.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1987–1987 · leading case: Dept. of Revenue v. First Union Nat. Bk.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dept. of Revenue v. First Union Nat. Bk. (1987) fla · cites it 8× “Appellees (banks) filed suit challenging the validity of the franchise tax imposed on banks and savings associations by section 220.63, Florida Statutes (1985), on the ground that it violated the Federal Public Debt Statute, 31 U.”

First Un. Nat. Bk. v. Fla. Dept. of Rev. (1987) fladistctapp · cites it 9× “This cause is before us on appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of appellees upholding the validity of Section 220.63, Florida Statutes, [1] on the grounds that the tax thereby imposed on banks is a nondiscriminatory franchise tax for the privilege of doing corporate…”

— 220.63(2) — 1 case

First Un. Nat. Bk. v. Fla. Dept. of Rev. (1987) fladistctapp “This cause is before us on appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of appellees upholding the validity of Section 220.63, Florida Statutes, [1] on the grounds that the tax thereby imposed on banks is a nondiscriminatory franchise tax for the privilege of doing corporate…”

— 220.63(3) — 1 case

Dept. of Revenue v. First Union Nat. Bk. (1987) fla “Appellees (banks) filed suit challenging the validity of the franchise tax imposed on banks and savings associations by section 220.63, Florida Statutes (1985), on the ground that it violated the Federal Public Debt Statute, 31 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.