The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS

Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 250.12

250.12 Appointment of commissioned and warrant officers.—The appointment of commissioned officers and warrant officers shall conform in number, rank, and designation, and shall be based upon and made in conformity with tables of organization for the National Guard as prescribed in National Guard regulations published by the National Guard Bureau. The appointees shall hold their appointments subject to continuance of federal recognition, or attainment of age 64 years, unless relieved by reason of resignation or disability or for a cause to be determined by a court-martial or efficiency board, legally convened for that purpose. Vacancies shall, when practicable, be filled by appointment from personnel of the Florida National Guard.

History.—s. 11, ch. 8502, 1921; s. 1, ch. 14761, 1931; s. 7, ch. 20849, 1941; CGL 2023; s. 1, ch. 25112, 1949; s. 12, ch. 2003-68.

Note.—Former s. 250.13.

F.S. 250.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 250.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 250.12

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 250.12

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 250.12.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FEESERS, INC. v. MICHAEL FOODS, INC., 632 F. Supp. 2d 414 (M.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . . §§ 250.12, 250.3, and Sodexho’s primary distributor Sysco was ineligible. . . .

AMBER RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC, LLC, LLC, E P USA, Co. E P LP, L. P. v. UNITED STATES,, 83 Fed. Cl. 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 250.12(b)(3)(i) (1980) (requiring MMS to determine if a lease suspension was in the national interest . . .

AMBER RESOURCES COMPANY, LLC, LLC, LLC, E P USA, Co. E P LP, L. P. v. UNITED STATES,, 538 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 250.12(b)(3)(i) (1980) (requiring MMS to determine if a lease suspension was in the national interest . . .

MALLETIER, v. DOONEY BOURKE, INC., 340 F. Supp. 2d 415 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . See 5 McCarthy, supra note 82, § 32:159, at 32-250.12 (Supp. 12/2000) ("Identification of the proper . . .

HIIBEL v. SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, HUMBOLDT COUNTY,, 542 U.S. 177 (U.S. 2004)

. . . The provision, originally designated §250.12,- provides that a person who is loitering “under circumstances . . . identify himself and give a reasonably credible account of the lawfulness of his conduct and purposes.” §250.12 . . .

MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION PRODUCING SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES v., 120 S. Ct. 2423 (U.S. 2000)

. . . Rather, a similar regulation existed at the time the parties signed the contracts, 30 CFR § 250.12(a) . . .

MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION PRODUCING SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 530 U.S. 604 (U.S. 2000)

. . . Rather, a similar regulation existed at the time the parties signed the contracts, 30 CFR §250.12(a)( . . .

PARRAVANO, L. v. BABBITT,, 861 F. Supp. 914 (N.D. Cal. 1994)

. . . Affairs Public Notices and a BIA Federal Register Notice, all of which were issued pursuant to 25 CFR 250.12 . . .

BAUGH, v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, a WI C., 823 F. Supp. 1452 (E.D. Wis. 1993)

. . . Yet, by enacting section 250.12, the City required smoke detectors in those residences. . . .

SHELL OIL COMPANY v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 950 F.2d 741 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 250.12(a), (b)). . . .

NATIONAL RECYCLING COALITION, INC. v. K. REILLY, U. S., 890 F.2d 1242 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 250.12(b) (1988); see also 53 Fed.Reg. at 23552/3 (discussing specifications related to aesthetics . . . . § 250.12(b) (1988). . . .

UNITED STATES v. EBERHARDT, UNITED STATES v. WILSON UNITED STATES v. MATTZ, W., 789 F.2d 1354 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . . §§ 250.9, 250.12. . . .

VILLAGE OF FALSE PASS, v. C. CLARK,, 733 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1984)

. . . . § 250.12(a)(1)(iv) (1982), recaptures the full measure of his discretion under NEPA: “the Director . . . See 30 C.F.R. § 250.12(d)(3) (1982). . . . See 30 C.F.R. § 250.12(d)(5) (1982). . . . See, e.g., 30 C.F.R. § 250.12(f)(3) (1982). Of course, some restraints on cancellation remain. . . . . § 250.12(d)(4) (1982). . . . . § 250.12(d)(4)(i). . . .

In J. DEITER,, 33 B.R. 547 (Bank. W.D. Wis. 1983)

. . . 287.67 44.75 credit adjustment 10/07 01/20 $242.92 11/12/82 57.13 12/14/82 149.34 $20.00 12/07 01/14/83 250.12 . . .

MARSHALL, v. NICHOLS, 486 F. Supp. 615 (E.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . . §§ 250.11, 250.12. . . .

PAULEY PETROLEUM INC. v. UNITED STATES, 591 F.2d 1308 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . . § 250.12 provides expressly that a “suspension” shall be limited in time only by the Secretary’s judgment . . . immediate and serious damage to “the leased deposits or other valuable mineral deposits” 30 C.F.R. § 250.12 . . .

PAULEY PETROLEUM INC. ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 219 Ct. Cl. 24 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . . § 250.12 provides expressly that a "suspension” shall be limited in time only by the Secretary’s judgment . . . immediate and serious damage to "the leased deposits or other valuable mineral deposits” 30 C.F.R. 250.12 . . .

STATE OF ALASKA v. D. ANDRUS, 580 F.2d 465 (D.C. Cir. 1978)

. . . . §§ 250.2(j); 250.11; 250.12(a). . . .

SUN OIL COMPANY, THE SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY AND MARATHON OIL COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 215 Ct. Cl. 716 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . . § 250.12(c).] . . .

SUN OIL COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 572 F.2d 786 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . . § 250.12(c).] . . .

COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, v. SECRETARY OF INTERIOR NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. v. SECRETARY OF INTERIOR M., 562 F.2d 1368 (2d Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 250.12(c); Union Oil Company, 512 F.2d at 751-52. . . .

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. C. B. MORTON,, 512 F.2d 743 (9th Cir. 1975)

. . . . § 250.12. . . . Although 30 C.F.R. § 250.12 provides expressly that a “suspension” shall be limited in time only by the . . . then determine whether each justification advanced by the Secretary is appropriate under 30 C.F.R. § 250.12 . . .

UNITED STATES NEWSOME, v. J. MALCOLM, J., 492 F.2d 1166 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . The court in Bereh commented that subdivision 6 was patterned after § 250.12 of Tentative Draft 13 of . . .

GULF OIL CORPORATION v. C. B. MORTON,, 345 F. Supp. 685 (C.D. Cal. 1972)

. . . Secretary further stated that the order “was issued in the interest of conservation under 30 C.F.R. 250.12 . . .

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, a a v. J. HICKEL, WEINGAND v. J. HICKEL, T. D. W. A. S. Co., 426 F.2d 164 (9th Cir. 1970)

. . . . §§ 250.1 (old and new), 250.11 (old and new), and 250.12 (old and new). . . .

M. LEWIS C. v. L. UDALL,, 374 F.2d 180 (9th Cir. 1967)

. . . . § 250.12 (1954 ed.) requires the issuance of the certificate once the acts have been done. . . .