Cases from cite.case.law:

MURRAY, v. LEWIS,, 576 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 1990)

. . . . § 250.30. In Florida, JOBS is implemented by Project Independence. . . .

STATE OF LOUISIANA, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 905 F.2d 877 (5th Cir. 1990)

. . . . § 250.30(b)(2) (1970). . . .

OHIO STATE PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION, v. B. CREASY,, 587 F. Supp. 698 (S.D. Ohio 1984)

. . . . § 250.30(b)(2)(i)(g)) contained language substantially different from the language of the present regulation . . .

MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION, v. S. DUKAKIS, 570 F. Supp. 628 (D. Mass. 1983)

. . . . § 250.30. . . .

In MADELINE MARIE NURSING HOMES. STATE OF OHIO, v. C. COLLINS, d b a St., 694 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 250.30(a)(2) (1976). . . . criterion required that the State plan provide “[reimbursement on a reasonable cost basis." 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . such actual allowable costs of a facility that is economically and efficiently operated. 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . See 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(13)(D) (1976); 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(2) (1976). . . . the State and approved in advance of implementation by the Regional Commissioner .... ” 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . .

In MADELINE MARIE NURSING HOMES. STATE OF OHIO, v. C. COLLINS, d b a St., 694 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 250.30(a)(2) (1976). . . . criterion required that the State plan provide “[Reimbursement on a reasonable cost basis.” 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . such actual allowable costs of a facility that is economically and efficiently operated. 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . See 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(13)(D) (1976); 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(2) (1976). . . . documentation for evaluation of experience under the State’s approved reimbursement plan. 45 C.F.R. §§ 250.30 . . .

PENNSYLVANIA PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOCIATION, a v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE OF COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,, 542 F. Supp. 1349 (W.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . .] § 250.30 [the predecessor to 42 C.F.R. 447.331-4] does not establish a minimum fee for pharmaceutical . . .

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES v. FLORIDA NURSING HOME ASSOCIATION, 450 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1981)

. . . HEW would not enforce the new “cost related” reimbursement requirement until January 1, 1978. 46 CFR §250.30 . . .

B. DeGREGORIO v. B. O BANNON, 500 F. Supp. 541 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . . § 250.30(a)(5), 36 Fed.Reg. 21591, and at that time stated that a state plan must: Provide that fee . . . In 1975, the regulation was recodified at 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(6); in 1976 at 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)( . . .

FLORIDA NURSING HOME ASSOCIATION v. PAGE, Jr. GOLDEN ISLES CONVALESCENT CENTER, INC. v. PAGE, Jr. GOLDEN ISLES CONVALESCENT CENTER, INC. d b a v. HARRIS, J. Jr., 616 F.2d 1355 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 250.30(a)(3)(iv) (1976) provides: The State plan shall set forth the methods and standards used by . . . The Alabama case also involved the validity of HEW regulation 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(3)(iv) (1976). . . .

SHASHOUA, M. D. v. F. QUERN,, 612 F.2d 282 (7th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 250.30, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. . . .

HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. v. L. TOIA, P. L. U. S., 473 F. Supp. 917 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . Social Security Act for participating States which shall be developed by the State . . ” (45 C.F.R. 250.30 . . . attention to whether the State plan contained “incentives for efficiency and economy.” 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . Moreover, such a requirement is not suggested by the regulations themselves, 45 C.F.R. § 250.30, as one . . .

SOLOMON, M. D. Ph. D. v. A. CALIFANO, Jr. A., 464 F. Supp. 1203 (D. Md. 1979)

. . . . §§ 201.5(a)(3), 250.30(d). . . . The regulation incorporating the “upper limits” standard, 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 (1970), was not applicable . . .

PAULEY PETROLEUM INC. v. UNITED STATES, 591 F.2d 1308 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . . § 250.30 (1969) stated that the lessee shall: “ * * * take all reasonable precautions to prevent damage . . .

PAULEY PETROLEUM INC. ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 219 Ct. Cl. 24 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . regulations under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, and their coverage was likewise ambiguous. 30 C.F.R. 250.30 . . .

RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, v. A. CALIFANO,, 585 F.2d 1153 (1st Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 250.30(b); see also Johnson’s Professional Nursing Home v. . . .

PHARMACISTS SOCIETY OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY, INC. a R. Ph. H. R. Ph. R. Ph. R. Ph. R. Ph. R. Ph. R. Ph. v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, P., 79 F.R.D. 405 (E.D. Wis. 1978)

. . . Section 250.30(b)(2)(i) provides: In establishing the dispensing fee, States should take into account . . . Section 250.30(a)(7) provides that the state’s plan should: Provide that fee structures will be established . . .

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL, v. M. WEINER, 569 F.2d 1156 (1st Cir. 1978)

. . . . § 1396a(a)(13)(D), and implementing Federal regulation at 45 C.F.R. 250.30, (2) whether the prospective . . . When implementing Section 232 of P.L. 92-603, the Secretary removed from 45 C.F.R. 250.30 the reference . . . The implementing Federal regulation, 45 C.F.R. 250.30(a), adopted in August, 1974, makes it clear that . . . charges to the general public or, when applicable, in accordance with Title XVIII regulations. 45 C.F.R. 250.30 . . .

STATE OF GEORGIA, By DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. A. CALIFANO, Jr., 446 F. Supp. 404 (N.D. Ga. 1977)

. . . . § 250.30. . . . The audit revealed that Georgia had paid some claims in excess of the ceilings imposed by 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . In October 1976, the provisions of 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 were renumbered. . . . Section 250.30 provides in pertinent part: (i) Payment to individual practitioners is limited to the . . . See 45 C.F.R. 250.30(b)(3). . 42 U.S.C. § 1396c provides: If the Secretary, after reasonable notice and . . .

AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION, INC. v. A. CALIFANO, Jr., 443 F. Supp. 612 (D.D.C. 1977)

. . . . § 250.30(b)(6)(iii)(e). . . .

OLSEN, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, W. CARVIN, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY v. TELEDYNE MOVIBLE OFFSHORE, INC. v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, BOOKER v. SHELL OIL COMPANY WALLACE, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY v. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, 561 F.2d 1178 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 250.30 Lease Terms, Regulations, Waste, Damage and Safety The lessee shall comply with the terms . . .

GOLDEN ISLES CONVALESCENT CENTER, INC. d b a v. A. CALIFANO, Jr., 442 F. Supp. 201 (S.D. Fla. 1977)

. . . Sec. 250.30(a)(3)(iv) setting an effective date of January 1, 1978, for implementation of Section 249 . . .

HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. v. L. TOIA, P. L. U. S., 438 F. Supp. 866 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)

. . . . §§ 250.30(a), 246.-10(a)(3), they seek relief against the Secretary. . . . and approve” state reimbursement plans, is amplified by the Secretary’s own regulations, 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . challenged. 3) INAPPROPRIATE SUBJECT MATTER Read together, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(13) (D) and 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . , passim) Claiming violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(13)(D) and the rules thereunder, 45 C.F.R. §§ 250.30 . . . require that HEW approval issue prior to the implementation of the offered state plan, 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . .

RUSH v. T. M. PARHAM, 440 F. Supp. 383 (N.D. Ga. 1977)

. . . . § 250.30(b)(3), sterilization prerequisites, 45 C.F.R. § 205.35; future utilization review 45 C.F.R . . . responsibilities, inter alia: to license practitioners; to set reasonable professional fee schedules, 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . .

ALABAMA NURSING HOME ASSOCIATION, v. CALIFANO, Jr., 433 F. Supp. 1325 (M.D. Ala. 1977)

. . . . § 250.30(a)(3)(iv). . . . Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief, attacking the HEW regulation, 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a . . . Section 250.30(a)(3)(iv) was promulgated under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 1302, which requires that . . . mathematical certainty because the state has not committed itself to a particular formula. . 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . . policy of not intending to enforce the statute until 1978, not of trying to override it. . 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . .

NATIONAL UNION OF HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES, RWDSU, AFL- CIO, RWDSU, AFL- CIO, v. CAREY, P., 557 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 250.30(a)(2)(i). . . .

AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION v. F. MATHEWS,, 429 F. Supp. 1179 (N.D. Ill. 1977)

. . . . § 250.30. . . .

HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK STATE, INC. v. L. TOIA,, 73 F.R.D. 565 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)

. . . . § 250.30(a)(2) (see Lewis v. . . .

UNITED STATES H. DAVIS, v. LONG S DRUGS, INC. a, 411 F. Supp. 1144 (S.D. Cal. 1976)

. . . . § 250.30(b)2 sets upper limits for the price charged for prescription drugs in accord with specific . . .

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PODIATRY SOCIETY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 407 F. Supp. 1259 (D.D.C. 1975)

. . . . § 250.30(b)(3)(i)(A) (1974). . . . The provisions of Section 250.30(b)(3)(i)(A) do not prescribe any particular methods for setting fees . . . The defendants contend that § 250.30 provides various methods for establishing upper limits, but the . . . Regulation 250.30 clearly states in subsection (b) that “The State agency may pay less than the upper . . . See 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(b)(2)(i)(A) (1974). . 394 F.Supp. at 27 (emphasis added). . 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . .

BRIARCLIFF HAVEN, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES OF STATE OF GEORGIA,, 403 F. Supp. 1355 (N.D. Ga. 1975)

. . . . § 250.30(b) (B). . . . . § 250.30(b). . . . According to 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(6), the state plan must provide for limiting participation in the . . .

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL, St. s v. W. SARGENT, 397 F. Supp. 1056 (D. Mass. 1975)

. . . . § 250.30(b)(1), and therefore violate Article VI of the United States Constitution; (3) That the continuing . . . Assistance, adopted pursuant to Mass.Gen.Law ch. 118E, § 4, follows closely the provisions of 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . .

OSTROW PHARMACIES, INC. v. BEAL,, 394 F. Supp. 22 (E.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . . § 250.30(b) (2)(i)(a), the federal regulation promulgated thereunder, in that the fee of $1.85 plus . . . Supplementing this provision of the Act, federal regulation 45 C.F.R. § 250.30, entitled “Reasonable . . . The defendants contend that § 250.30 provides various methods for establishing upper limits, but the . . . Regulation 250.30 clearly states in subsection (b) that “The State agency may pay less than the upper . . . R. § 250.30(a)(6). . . .

JOHNSON S PROFESSIONAL NURSING HOME v. W. WEINBERGER, OPELIKA NURSING HOME, INC. v. W. WEINBERGER,, 490 F.2d 841 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . . § 250.30(b) (3) (ii), the Secretary limited Medicaid payments to skilled nursing homes to “reasonable . . . And with 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(6) he sought to gradually eliminate “supplementation” programs which allow . . . In implementing the statute the Secretary promulgated 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(b) (3) (ii) which provides that . . . The Secretary has tracked in the regulation, 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(6), the expressed congressional objective . . . of the Social Security Act. . 42 U.S.C.A. § 1395x(v). . 20 C.F.R. §§ 405.401-405.488. . 45 C.F.R. § 250.30 . . .

AMERICAN NURSING HOME ASSOCIATION, v. COST OF LIVING COUNCIL, 368 F. Supp. 490 (D.D.C. 1973)

. . . . § 250.30) cannot exceed the reasonable cost reimbursement made by the Secretary to such facilities . . . for comparable medical services under Medicare. (45 C.F.R. § 250.30(b)(3)(ii).) . . .

H. YANEZ v. E. JONES, Jr., 361 F. Supp. 701 (D. Utah 1973)

. . . . § 250.30(a) (6), which states: Participation in the [Medicaid] program will be limited to providers . . . F.R. § 250.30(a)(6). . . . There is no need to decide, as defendants urge, whether 45 C.F.R. § 250.30(a)(6) alone implies a remedy . . . This is the evil which § 250.30(a)(6) was designed to avoid. . . . The court, therefore, construes Title XIX and Regulation 250.30(a)(6) 'as creating a duty which runs . . .

OPELIKA NURSING HOME, INC. a v. L. RICHARDSON, L., 356 F. Supp. 1338 (M.D. Ala. 1973)

. . . , Education and Welfare regulations providing for payment for skilled nursing home services (45 CFR 250.30 . . . The first regulation promulgated by the Secretary and here challenged by the plaintiffs, 45 CFR 250.30 . . . The second challenged regulation, 45 CFR 250.30(a)(6), requires states having existing programs that . . . As noted earlier, plaintiffs challenge 45 CFR 250.30(b) (3) (ii) on both procedural and substantive grounds . . .

OPELIKA NURSING HOME, INC. v. L. RICHARDSON,, 448 F.2d 658 (5th Cir. 1971)

. . . . § 250.30(b) (3) (ii) provides that payments made by a state agency to skilled nursing homes under a . . .

CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICE,, 448 F.2d 209 (2d Cir. 1971)

. . . . § 250.30. . . .

OPELIKA NURSING HOME, INC. a a a a v. L. RICHARDSON, L., 323 F. Supp. 1206 (M.D. Ala. 1971)

. . . constitutionality of two Department of Health, Education and Welfare (hereinafter HEW) regulations — 45 C.F.R. 250.30 . . . ceiling being “reasonable charges consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care.” 45 C.F.R. 250.30 . . . decree of this Court that defendants’ motions to dismiss be and the same are hereby granted. . 45 C.F.R. 250.30 . . . It should also be noted that 45 C.F.R. 250.30(b) (3) (ii) became effective as of July 1, 1970, while . . .

UNITED STATES WILKERSON, v. COMMANDING OFFICER, ARMED FORCES EXAMINING STATION,, 286 F. Supp. 290 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)

. . . and that his father, who suffered a stroke the year before and is no longer able to work, receives $250.30 . . . Levi showed that the income of his parents was $250.30 per month, that neither parent was physically . . .

L. C. v., 37 T.C. 1099 (T.C. 1962)

. . . Thus, $1,348.35 paid as a storm assessment to the City of Los Angeles on February 20,1931, and $250.30 . . .