Florida Statute 250.33 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVII
MILITARY AFFAIRS AND RELATED MATTERS

Chapter 250
MILITARY AFFAIRS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 250.33

250.33 Powers of commanding officer on state active duty.—The commanding officer of troops on state active duty may incarcerate and detain, until such person can be turned over to the civil authorities, any person guilty of drunkenness, breach of the peace, or disorderly conduct, within 1 mile of a camp, garrison, or station. The commanding officer may also abate any menace to the health or safety of his or her command, camp, garrison, or station.

History.—s. 38, ch. 8502, 1921; CGL 2050; s. 1, ch. 25112, 1949; s. 108, ch. 95-148; s. 28, ch. 2003-68.

Note.—Former s. 250.44.

F.S. 250.33 on Google Scholar

F.S. 250.33 on Casetext

Amendments to 250.33

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 250.33

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 250.33.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 250.33

Total Results: 9

Wilson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-04-03

Citation: 294 So. 2d 327

Snippet: take the stand. Simmons v. State, supra; RCrP 3.250, 33 F.S.A., (replacing F.S. § 918.09). Seizing in such

Walters v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-01-22

Citation: 288 So. 2d 298, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8181

Snippet: shirt marked for identification. Florida CrPR 3.250, 33 F.S.A., provides in part "... a defendant offering

Wilson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-10-05

Citation: 284 So. 2d 24

Snippet: adopted § 918.09 F.S. as criminal procedure Rule 3.250, 33 F.S.A., and there is no reason to believe the same

Statewright v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-06-06

Citation: 278 So. 2d 652

Snippet: and manner as any other witness. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.250, 33 F.S.A. And when a witness on direct examination

State v. Mathis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-05-23

Citation: 278 So. 2d 280

Snippet: defendant failed to testify violating Crim. Rule 3.250, 33 F.S.A. (former Fla. Stat. § 918.09). Relying on

Davis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-12-29

Citation: 256 So. 2d 22

Snippet: Fla.Stat. § 918.09, 1969 F.S.A. (now Cr.P.R. 1.250, 33 F.S.A.). Appellant argues and we agree that the

Armstrong v. City of Tampa

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-11-14

Citation: 106 So. 2d 407

Snippet: state of facts. Thompson v. State, 1945, 199 Ga. 250, 33 S.E.2d 903. Consistent with the views which we

Carmazi v. Board of County Commissioners of Dade County

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-07-18

Citation: 104 So. 2d 727

Snippet: (Emphasis added.) In Thompson v. State, 199 Ga. 250, 33 S.E.2d 903, the Supreme Court of Georgia said:

Riley v. Lawson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1932-08-24

Citation: 143 So. 619, 106 Fla. 521

Snippet: 63 L.Ed. 527; Rosenthal v. New York,226 U.S. 250, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 27, 57 L.Ed. 212. The conditions