Florida Statute 258.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVIII
PUBLIC LANDS AND PROPERTY

Chapter 258
STATE PARKS AND PRESERVES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 258.08

258.08 Guide meridian and base parallel park located.—Guide meridian and base parallel park, a park for the perpetuation and preservation of the point or place from which the state was surveyed, is established and located in Tallahassee, Leon County, on a parcel of land one-half acre square, having for its center the intersection of the guide meridian and the base parallel of Florida, more particularly described as follows, to wit:

One-eighth of an acre in the form of a square, in the northwest corner of section six in township one south, range one east; one-eighth of an acre in the form of a square, in the southwest corner of section thirty-one in township one north, range one east; one-eighth of an acre in the form of a square, in the southeast corner of section thirty-six in township one north, range one west; and one-eighth of an acre in the form of a square in the northeast corner of section one in township one south, range one west.

History.—s. 1, ch. 10188, 1925; ss. 1, 2, ch. 11902, 1927; CGL 1740, 1742, 1743.

F.S. 258.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 258.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 258.08

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 258.08

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 258.08.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 258.08

Total Results: 4

Rivers v. Lozeau

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1989-02-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 539 So. 2d 1147, 1989 WL 13613

Snippet: bounded by monuments set by surveyor Moorhead in 1964. This would be an entirely different case if the land descriptions in question described lines "commencing at (or running to) a concrete monument set in 1964 by surveyor Moorehead, etc." [9] See § 258.08, Fla. Stat., and Fla. Stat.Annot., Vol. 1, page 119, (West 1961). Unfortunately, this helpful material has been omitted from the 1988 edition of this volume of F.S.A. [10] Notwithstanding that Rizzo and Brown both may have subjectively believed or

Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Pickard

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1972-11-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 269 So. 2d 714

Snippet: plans, specifications, and a "plug" mold for the manufacture, by defendants, of still larger trawler hulls. Ashland determined the location of Pickard's Miami boat yard. [7] See: § 671.201(39) and State v. Hickman, Fla.App. 1966, 189 So.2d 254, 258. [8] Doelle v. Ireco Chemicals, 391 F.2d 6, 9 Williams, 145 Fla. 709, 200 So. 220, 222; (10th Cir., 1968); see: Hartsfield v. Bergman v. George, 202 Misc. 998, 117 N.Y.S.2d 27, 30, (Spec.Term, 1952); Huddleston v. Lee, 39 Tenn. App. 465, 284 S.W.2d 705

Miller v. Ellenwood

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1935-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 164 So. 140, 121 Fla. 551

Snippet: for improvements made by the town of Holly Hill for watermain assessments amounting in one case to $50.66, and in another to $101.31, have not been paid by the defendants, nor have they paid the taxes due to the town for the year 1932, amounting to $258.08, and a tax certificate was issued to the town, No. 109, for that amount. Complainants allege that the failure to pay such assessments and taxes constituted a violation of the covenants of the mortgage. *Page 555 In the decree the various items of

Edwards v. Lewis

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1929-11-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 124 So. 746, 98 Fla. 956

Snippet: Tire Rubber Co. v. Hanover State Bank, 109 Kan. 772, 21 A. L. R. 677, 204 Pac. R. 992; Messinger v. Carroll Tr. Sav. Bank, 193 Iowa 608, 187 N.W. R. 545; State v. Bank *Page 969 of Commerce, 61 Neb. 181, 52 L.R.A. 858; Kinney v. Paine,68 Miss. 258, 8 So. R. 747. This is not the rule in a number of states but the reasoning of the Court in Federal Reserve Bank v. Peters, supra, and also in Bank v. Millspaugh, 281 S.W. R. 733, 47 A. L. R. 754; Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Malloy, supra, and