Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 265.002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 265.002 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 265.002

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XVIII
PUBLIC LANDS AND PROPERTY
Chapter 265
MEMORIALS, MUSEUMS, AND ARTS AND CULTURE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 265.002
265.002 Legislative intent; Florida Medal of Honor Wall; duties of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.
(1) It is the intent of the Florida Legislature to recognize and honor those who are accredited, or associated by birth, to the State of Florida, who through their conspicuous bravery and gallantry during wartime, and at considerable risk to their own lives, were made recipients of the Medal of Honor. In doing so, these members of our Armed Forces brought great credit upon themselves, their military units, and the State of Florida.
(2)(a) There is hereby established the Florida Medal of Honor Wall. The Department of Management Services shall, in consultation with the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, designate an appropriate area on the Plaza Level of the Capitol Building in Tallahassee for this purpose. The department shall also subsequently consult with the Department of Veterans’ Affairs regarding the design and theme of such area.
(b) Each recipient who is accredited, or associated by birth, to the State of Florida and has been awarded the Medal of Honor shall have a plaque or similar designation approved by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs placed on the Medal of Honor Wall, which designation shall provide information regarding the Floridian’s particular act of heroism as well as other information relating to the nature of the act.
(3) Verification of residency, dates of the receipt of the award, and other specific information pertaining to each recipient shall be the responsibility of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, which shall certify eligibility for inclusion of individuals to be added to the Florida Medal of Honor Wall.
History.s. 1, ch. 96-208; s. 42, ch. 98-279; s. 2, ch. 2008-84.

F.S. 265.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 265.002 on Casetext

Amendments to 265.002


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 265.002
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 265.002.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 265.002

Total Results: 20

S.L.L., A Child v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-20T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: cosmetology without a license is a crime. § 477.0265(2), Fla. Stat. We agree with the parties that it

State of Florida v. Yolanda Denise Harvey

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-06-28T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: downward departure as required by section 921.00265(2), Florida Statutes (2017), we are constrained to

RENALDO CHAMPAGNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: offender's sentence below the [LPS]." § 921.00265(2).

Champagne v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 269 So. 3d 629

Snippet: offender's sentence below the [LPS]." § 921.00265(2). The CPC expressly states that it applies "

Champagne v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 269 So. 3d 629

Snippet: offender's sentence below the [LPS]." § 921.00265(2). The CPC expressly states that it applies "

State v. Lindsay

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-05-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 163 So. 3d 721, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6430, 2015 WL 1942890

Snippet: calculations from the total sentence points. § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat. (2008); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704

State v. Hodges

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 151 So. 3d 531, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18400, 2014 WL 5836122

Snippet: for the downward departure. See § 921.00265(2); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27)(A). 4 …under rule 3.704, rule 3.800(b)(2) or section 921.00265(2). 5 See Miran v. State, 46 So

State v. Hodges

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-11-11T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: basis for the downward departure. See § 921.00265(2); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27)(A).4 …under rule 3.704, rule 3.800(b)(2) or section 921.00265(2).5 See Miran v. State, 46 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 2d DCA

Reginald L. Bryant v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-10-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 148 So. 3d 1251, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2970

Snippet: required by statute and rule. Id.; see also § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27). Citing

State of Florida v. Harry James Chubbuck

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-06-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 141 So. 3d 1163, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 437, 2014 WL 2765926, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1982

Snippet: within 7 days after the date of sentencing. § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). . Pursuant to section 945.12

State v. McElroy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-04-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 145 So. 3d 866, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6251, 2014 WL 1779821

Snippet: scoresheet. See Hall, 981 So.2d at 513 (citing § 921.00265(2) and explaining that a trial court must file written

State v. Marron

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-04-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 111 So. 3d 210, 2013 WL 1316393, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5358

Snippet: within seven days after sentencing, id.-, § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat. (1998), or, if it orally pronounces

State v. Marron

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-02-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 106 So. 3d 1005, 2013 WL 616351, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2601

Snippet: within seven days after sentencing, id.; § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat. (1998), or, if it orally pronounces

State v. Kolodz

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-01-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 79 So. 3d 117, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 510, 2012 WL 126305

Snippet: providing written reasons as required by section 921.00265(2), Florida Statutes (2010), and Florida Rule of

Jackson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-02-17T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 64 So. 3d 90, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 81, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 415, 2011 WL 536429

Snippet: calculations from the total sentence points. § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat. (2008); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704…seven days after the date of sentencing. § 921.00265(2); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27)(A). A court…seven days after the date of sentencing. § 921.00265(2); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(27)(A). A court

Hankins v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-08-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 42 So. 3d 871, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12169, 2010 WL 3239003

Snippet: reoffender. That offense is a violation of section 265.02(1) of the New York Penal Code. The record does

State v. Ford

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-02-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 27 So. 3d 725, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 910, 2010 WL 363888

Snippet: explained in writing ...."); accord § 921.00265(2), Fla. Stat. (2009) (requiring a "written

Andries v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 12 So. 3d 260, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4462, 2009 WL 1310987

Snippet: diagnosis, and the anecdotal association between *265 the two has been recognized to be worthy of formal and

State v. Hall

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-04-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 981 So. 2d 511

Snippet: seven days after the date of sentencing. § 921.00265(2); see also Carlson, 911 So.2d at 236; State v. …on the record at the sentencing hearing. § 921.00265(2); see also Pease v. State, 712 So.2d 374, 374 (

State v. Naylor

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-03-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 976 So. 2d 1193

Snippet: seven days after the date of sentencing. § 921.00265(2); State v. Carlson, 911 So.2d 234, 236 (Fla. 2d…sentencing hearing which support the sentence. § 921.00265(2); see also Pease v. State, 712 So.2d 374, 374 (