Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 295.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 295.01 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 295.01

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XX
VETERANS
Chapter 295
LAWS RELATING TO VETERANS: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 295.01
295.01 Spouses and dependent children of deceased or disabled servicemembers; education.—
(1) As used in this section, the terms “Armed Forces” and “servicemember” shall have the same meanings as provided in s. 250.01.
(2)(a) It is the policy of the state to provide educational opportunity at state expense for a dependent child, as defined in s. 1009.21(1), of a servicemember who:
1. Died as a result of service-connected injuries, disease, or disability sustained while on active duty; or
2. Has been:
a. Determined by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs or its predecessor to have a service-connected 100-percent total and permanent disability rating for compensation;
b. Determined to have a service-connected total and permanent disability rating of 100 percent and is in receipt of disability retirement pay from any branch of the United States Armed Forces; or
c. Issued a valid identification card by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs in accordance with s. 295.17.
(b) The dependent child of a deceased servicemember is eligible for educational benefits under this section if:
1. Immediately preceding the death of the servicemember, Florida was listed as the servicemember’s official home of record in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) database; or
2. The child qualifies as a resident for tuition purposes under s. 1009.21.
(c) The dependent child of a disabled servicemember is eligible for educational benefits under this section if:
1. Immediately preceding the occurrence of the servicemember’s disability, Florida was listed as the servicemember’s official home of record in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) database; or
2. The child qualifies as a resident for tuition purposes under s. 1009.21 and the servicemember is a resident of this state.

All rules, restrictions, and limitations set forth in this section shall apply.

(3) It is also the policy of the state to provide educational opportunity at state expense for spouses of deceased or disabled servicemembers.
(a) The unremarried spouse of a deceased servicemember is eligible for educational benefits under this section if the unremarried spouse applies to use the benefit within 5 years after the servicemember’s death and:
1. Immediately preceding the servicemember’s death, Florida was listed as the servicemember’s official home of record in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) database; or
2. The spouse qualifies as a resident for tuition purposes under s. 1009.21.
(b) The dependent spouse of a disabled servicemember is eligible for educational benefits under this section if the servicemember and his or her spouse have been married to each other for 1 year and:
1. Immediately preceding the occurrence of the servicemember’s disability, Florida was listed as the servicemember’s official home of record in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) database; or
2. The spouse qualifies as a resident for tuition purposes under s. 1009.21 and the servicemember is a resident of this state.
(c) The eligibility for educational benefits under paragraph (b) applies only during the duration of the marriage and up to the point of termination of the marriage by dissolution or annulment.

All rules, restrictions, and limitations set forth in this section shall apply.

(4) Sections 295.03-295.05 and 1009.40 shall apply.
(5) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules for administering this section.
(6) A child or spouse of a servicemember may receive benefits under either this section or s. 295.061.
History.—s. 1, ch. 20966, 1941; s. 1, ch. 21655, 1943; s. 1, ch. 28195, 1953; s. 1, ch. 67-455; s. 16, ch. 69-180; s. 1, ch. 82-93; s. 2, ch. 83-71; s. 12, ch. 84-114; s. 11, ch. 87-356; s. 21, ch. 88-290; s. 25, ch. 89-207; s. 6, ch. 93-268; s. 20, ch. 95-143; s. 6, ch. 2000-294; s. 948, ch. 2002-387; s. 6, ch. 2004-230; s. 1, ch. 2005-127; s. 1, ch. 2006-244; s. 6, ch. 2019-24; s. 1, ch. 2023-279.

F.S. 295.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 295.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 295.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 295.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 295.01.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 295.01

Total Results: 20

Mindy Lee v. Animal Aid, Inc. and Rhoda Mann

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-12

Snippet: speech in connection with public issues. § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. (2018). Further, section 768.295

Mindy Lee v. Animal Aid, Inc. and Rhoda Mann

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-28

Snippet: speech in connection with public issues. § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. (2018). Further, section 768.295

ANNE MCQUEEN v. CAROLE BASKIN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-17

Snippet: 9 § 768.295(1). It does so by prohibiting any lawsuit, cause

BIROL OZYESILPINAR v. REACH PLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-17

Snippet: action for all counts. Pursuant to section 768.295(1), Florida Statutes,4 BET additionally asserted its

WILLIAM B. CROSBY, III v. TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-29

Snippet: speech in connection with public issues.” § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. Section 768.295(3) specifically

UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. CARLOS ENRIQUE LUNA LAM

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-11-02

Snippet: speech in connection with public issues.” § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. Bound by our recent decision in Vericker

MITCHELL SCOTT NOVICK v. MANGO'S TROPICAL CAFE, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-31

Snippet: speech in connection with public issues.” § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. (2021).

KEVIN VERICKER v. NORMAN POWELL

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-10

Snippet: speech in connection with public issues.” § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. (2021). Specifically, the statute prevents

CARLOS ENRIQUE LUNA LAM v. UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-10-13

Snippet: expeditiously disposed of by the courts. § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. (2021). The statute further

WPB RESIDENTS FOR INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT, INC. v. SHARON "SHANON" MATERIO

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-30

Snippet: speech in connection with public issues.” § 768.295(1), Fla. Stat. After a hearing, the circuit court

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2002-11-04

Snippet: providers are confidential and exempt); 408.061(8); 414.295(1) (personal identifying information in temporary

GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY v. Day

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-03-30

Citation: 784 So. 2d 494, 2001 WL 303239

Snippet: corporations. (Emphasis added) [3] See Section 196.295(1) and Rule 12D-13.016(1), which provide that when

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1995-03-07

Snippet: school board were set forth therein). 6 Section 196.295(1), Florida Statutes, provides that: In the event

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1990-12-05

Snippet: the taxes in escrow, as required by Sections 196.295(1) and (2) F.S. To provide some measure of protection

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-04-07

Snippet: their affairs. See Weaver v. Heidtman, 245 So.2d 295 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1971). Basically, there are two types

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-09-21

Snippet: 9 (Fla. 1971), and Weaver v. Heidtman,245 So.2d 295 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1971). Furthermore, noncharter counties

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1977-03-31

Snippet: 2d 1 (Fla. 1971); Weaver v. Heidtman, 245 So.2d 295 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1971); and the Commentary in 26A F

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-01-30

Snippet: County v. Okaloosa County School Board, 250 So.2d 295 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1971). This is particularly true in

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-01-28

Snippet: 1, 5 (Fla. 1971); Weaver v. Heidtman, 245 So.2d 295 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1971); cf. State ex rel. Volusia County

Oscar Dooly Associates, Inc. v. Mumford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-05-12

Citation: 235 So. 2d 305, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6372

Snippet: 88 Ga. 321, 14 S.E. 556; Doonan v. Ives, 73 Ga. 295(1, a); Morris v. Jackson, 9 Ga.App. 848, 72 S.E. 444