The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . system or other merit-type system, with the exception of those positions which are exempt pursuant to s. 295.07 . . .
. . . See §§ 295.07-295.09, Fla. Stat. (2012). We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(C). . . . narrowly describes Title 1 as “a federal program for students on free or reduced lunch programs.” . 295.07 . . .
. . . , s. 295.08, s. 295.085, or s. 295.09(l)(a) or (b); and, in the event of a violation of s. 295.07, s. . . . (breaking section 295.14(1) into two clauses and adding sections 295.07, 295.08, and 295.085(1) to the . . . However, we review de novo PERC’s determination that the City violated section 295.07(2) because that . . . Section 295.07(2) does not require covered employers to do anything; the statute simply authorizes DVA . . . The City argues that PERC’s conclusion that it violated section 295.07(2) by failing to grant Landolfi . . .
. . . . § 295.07, when it failed to initially hire and then retain him. . . . Stat. § 295.07; Cohen v. . . . Stat. § 295.07. . . .
. . . the wife of a disabled veteran who qualifies for a veterans’ preference in hiring pursuant to section 295.07 . . . In relevant part, section 295.07(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), provides: (1) The state and political . . .
. . . . §§ 295.07 & 295.085. The County moved for summary judgment. . . .
. . . . §§ 295.07 & 295.085. The County moved for summary judgment. . . .
. . . Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, and violates the Florida’s Veterans’ Preference Act, §§ 295.07 . . . Section 295.07 of the Florida Statutes states that “[t]he state and political subdivisions in the state . . .
. . . the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and requested a veteran’s preference pursuant to section 295.07 . . . Section 295.07 requires that the State of Florida and its political subdivisions accord a preference . . .
. . . cross appeal involving the application of Florida’s “veteran’s preference” in hiring statute, Sections 295.07 . . . Section 295.07, Florida Statutes (1989), provides in pertinent part: (1) The state and its political . . . shall be given by the state and its political subdivisions first to those persons included under s. 295.07 . . . (l)(a) and (b), and second to those persons included under s. 295.07(l)(c) and (d), provided such persons . . . In the present case, appellant Harris qualifies for a veteran’s preference under Section 295.07(l)(c) . . .
. . . appellee violated his right to a veteran’s preference in employment, for which he qualified under section 295.07 . . . The record shows that since accrual of his eligibility under section 295.07, appellant has been so employed . . .
. . . was more qualified than appellant, the hearing officer concluded that the County violated Sections 295.07 . . . We would note that Section 295.07, Florida Statutes, establishes four classes of veterans or spouses . . . Appellant falls under section 295.07(l)(c) which applies to: (c) A veteran of any war who has served . . . shall be given by the state and its political subdivisions first to those persons included under s. 295.07 . . . (l)(a) and (b), and second to those persons included under s. 295.07(l)(c) and (d), provided such persons . . .
. . . Section 295.07, Florida Statutes 1947, F.S.A., provides that “preference shall be given to” certain veterans . . . Although F.S. § 295.07, F.S.A., was in full force and effect when appellee was laid off, ten other employees . . . Section 295.07, F.S.A. and the Civil Service Rule (which is a verbatim copy of the statute) or whether . . . Section 295.07, F.S.A., was not accorded to him, and he prayed for a writ commanding a rescission of . . . Section 295.07, F.S.A. . . . The appellants take the position that inasmuch as the legislature, after directing, in Sec. 295.07, supra . . . of Miami to govern lay-offs appears to ignore the advantages secured to a former serviceman by Sec. 295.07 . . .