Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 310.0015 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 310.0015 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 310.0015

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXII
PORTS AND HARBORS
Chapter 310
PILOTS, PILOTING, AND PILOTAGE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 310.0015
310.0015 Piloting regulation; general provisions.
(1) Piloting is an essential service of such paramount importance that its continued existence must be secured by the state and may not be left open to market forces.
(2) Because safety is the primary objective in the regulation of piloting by the state and because of the significant economies of scale in delivering the service, the requirement of a large capital investment in order to provide required service, and the fact that pilots are supplying services that are considered to be essential to the economy and the public welfare, it is determined that economic regulation, rather than competition in the marketplace, will better serve to protect the public health, safety, and welfare.
(3) The rate-setting process, the issuance of licenses only in numbers deemed necessary or prudent by the board, and other aspects of the economic regulation of piloting established in this chapter are intended to protect the public from the adverse effects of unrestricted competition which would result from an unlimited number of licensed pilots being allowed to market their services on the basis of lower prices rather than safety concerns. This system of regulation benefits and protects the public interest by maximizing safety, avoiding uneconomic duplication of capital expenses and facilities, and enhancing state regulatory oversight. The system seeks to provide pilots with reasonable revenues, taking into consideration the normal uncertainties of vessel traffic and port usage, sufficient to maintain reliable, stable piloting operations. Pilots have certain restrictions and obligations under this system, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Pilots may not refuse to provide piloting services to any person or entity that may lawfully request such services, except for justifiable concerns relating to safety, or, in the case of a vessel planning a departure, for nonpayment of pilotage.
(b) Pilots may not unilaterally determine the pilotage rates they charge. Such pilotage rates shall instead be determined by the Pilotage Rate Review Committee, in the public interest, as set forth in s. 310.151.
(c) Pilots shall maintain or secure adequate pilot boats, office facilities and equipment, dispatch systems, communication equipment and other facilities, and equipment and support services necessary for a modern, dependable piloting operation.
(d) The pilot or pilots in a port shall train and compensate all member deputy pilots in that port. Failure to train or compensate such deputy pilots constitutes a ground for disciplinary action under s. 310.101. Nothing in this subsection may be deemed to create an agency or employment relationship between a pilot or deputy pilot and the pilot or pilots in a port.
(e) In any instance of a payment or transfer of funds, a request for the payment or transfer of funds, or a contractual obligation assumed in respect to the payment or transfer of funds from a licensee payor to a pilot or group of pilots, or to any legal entity or fund administered or controlled by or under common control with such pilot or group of pilots, the pilot or group of pilots shall provide to the licensee payor, at the time the payment or transfer or request for the payment or transfer is made or the obligation is assumed in respect to the payment or transfer, a detailed accounting of the specific assets, tangible or intangible, in which an interest is being directly or indirectly purchased or for which the licensee payor is being granted an interest in return for such payment or transfer of funds or such contractual obligation. This paragraph does not apply to either payments or transfers of funds if their aggregate amounts are less than $1,000. As used in this paragraph, “licensee payor” means any current or prospective state pilot or deputy pilot.
History.s. 338, ch. 94-119; s. 66, ch. 2000-356; s. 2, ch. 2010-225; s. 226, ch. 2011-142; s. 4, ch. 2024-178.

F.S. 310.0015 on Google Scholar

F.S. 310.0015 on Casetext

Amendments to 310.0015


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 310.0015
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 310.0015.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 310.0015

Total Results: 6

Eriese Alphonso Tisdale v. State of Florida – Corrected Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-29

Snippet: Body and Brain, 30 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 307, 310-15 (2018); Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), Ctrs

Eriese Alphonso Tisdale v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-08

Citation: 257 So. 3d 357

Snippet: 30 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 307 , 310-15 (2018) ; Adverse Childhood Experiences

South Florida Cargo Carriers Ass'n v. State, Department of Business & Professional Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-06-23

Citation: 738 So. 2d 391, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8314, 1999 WL 452149

Snippet: order to provide the required services (Sections 310.0015(1) and (2), Florida Statutes). In addition the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-12-02

Snippet: government and protection of the port. Section 310.015, F.S., is authority for the promulgation by the

Maas Bros. v. Guaranty Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-11-16

Citation: 180 So. 2d 195, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3834

Snippet: floor covering, deponent disbursed the sum of $1,310.-15 of the loan proceeds to the developer-borrower

Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. Beville

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-11-22

Citation: 86 Fla. 479, 98 So. 354

Snippet: 547, 69 S. E. Rep. 614; Harn v. Smith, 79 Tex. 310, 15 S. W. Rep. 240; Hughes v. Graves, 39 Vt. 359; Arrington