Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 336.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 336.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 336.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 336.02

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXVI
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
Chapter 336
COUNTY ROAD SYSTEM
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 336.02
336.02 Responsibility for county road system; approval of maps of reservation.
(1)(a) The commissioners are invested with the general superintendence and control of the county roads and structures within their respective counties, and they may establish new roads, change and discontinue old roads, and keep the roads in good repair in the manner herein provided. They are responsible for establishing the width and grade of such roads and structures in their respective counties.
(b) Commissioners may approve maps of reservation for any transportation facility or transportation corridor within the county’s jurisdiction. Any such maps must delineate the limits of the transportation corridor or of the proposed rights-of-way for the eventual widening of an existing or proposed transportation facility. Before approving or disapproving such map, the governing body of the county shall advertise and hold a public hearing and shall notify all property owners of record within the limits of the transportation corridor or rights-of-way of the transportation facility shown on the proposed map, as recorded in the property appraiser’s office, and all local governmental entities in which the transportation corridor or transportation facility is located, by mail at least 20 days prior to the date set for the hearing. If the map is approved by the governing body of the county, the circuit court clerk or county clerk, as appropriate, of the affected county shall forthwith record the map in accordance with chapter 177 in the public land records of the county. Minor amendments to such maps may be made by the county after recordation, which amendments are not subject to the notice and public hearing provisions of this section, except that property owners directly affected by changes in a minor amendment and all local governmental entities in which a minor amendment occurs must be notified by mail. Minor amendments are defined as those changes which affect less than 5 percent of the total area within the map.
(2) Upon recording, such map shall establish a building setback line from the centerline of any transportation facility and an area of proposed right-of-way and shall cite the ordinance which defines building restrictions for such maps.
(3) Prior to filing any map pursuant to this section, a county shall have adopted an ordinance defining the types of restrictions on nonresidential and residential construction within the proposed rights-of-way and building setback lines. In no case, however, shall said ordinance restrict the renovation of an existing residential structure when the cost of the renovation does not exceed 20 percent of the appraised value of the structure.
(4) Upon petition by any property owner of record within the limits of the map, alleging that such property regulation is unreasonable or arbitrary and that its effect is to deny a substantial portion of the beneficial use of such property, the county shall hold a hearing. When such a hearing results in a finding in favor of the petitioning property owner, the county shall have 180 days from the date of such order to acquire such property, to amend the map, to withdraw the map, or to file appropriate proceedings. Either party may seek appellate review.
(5) Upon the failure by the county to acquire such property or to initiate acquisition proceedings, the appropriate local governmental entity may issue any permit in accordance with its established procedures.
History.s. 42, ch. 29965, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-776; s. 61, ch. 84-309; s. 2, ch. 86-47; s. 13, ch. 88-168.

F.S. 336.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 336.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 336.02


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 336.02

Total Results: 14

State v. Family Bank of Hallandale

667 So. 2d 257, 1995 WL 511579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1995 | Docket: 341474

Cited 22 times | Published

added). Accord Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 336(2) (1981) ("The right of an assignee is subject to

Campos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

32 F. Supp. 2d 1337, 1998 WL 915370

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1998 | Docket: 2208468

Cited 9 times | Published

of the ultimate denial of citizenship. 8 C.F.R. § 336.2. This appeal is heard by another staff officer

Bd. of Monroe Cty. Com'rs v. Dept. of Community Affairs

560 So. 2d 240, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 540, 1990 WL 6503

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1990 | Docket: 1739486

Cited 9 times | Published

superintendence and control of county roads. See § 336.02(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1988). Moreover, the

Taylor v. Green Tree Financial Servicing Corp. (In Re Taylor)

260 B.R. 548, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1781, 2000 WL 33255492

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2000 | Docket: 1825825

Cited 4 times | Published

Hoffbeck, 415 N.W.2d at 449; see also MINN. STAT. § 336.2-302(1)(2000). Minnesota courts generally will not

Florida Key Deer Deer v. Board of County Commissioners

772 F. Supp. 601, 34 ERC (BNA) 1358, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12717, 1991 WL 179752

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 1991 | Docket: 1740101

Cited 3 times | Published

species within the United States ... [3] Fla.Stat. § 336.02(1)(a), vests responsibility and control of county

Campos v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

70 F. Supp. 2d 1296, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22571, 1998 WL 1118627

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1998 | Docket: 2370187

Cited 1 times | Published

of the ultimate denial of citizenship. 8 C.F.R. § 336.2. This appeal is heard by another staff officer

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Aug 21, 2001 | Docket: 3255530

Published

powers, to provide for and regulate roads.3 Section 336.02, Florida Statutes, a section of the Florida

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 26, 1997 | Docket: 3258551

Published

maintenance, and development of such roads. Section 336.02, Florida Statutes, specifically vests responsibility

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 11, 1994 | Docket: 3257285

Published

State, 335 So.2d 815, 817 (Fla. 1976). 6 See, section 336.02, Florida Statutes (1993), providing that the

Ecological Development, Inc. v. Walton County

558 So. 2d 1069, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1744, 1990 WL 28172

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1990 | Docket: 64649166

Published

superintendence and control” of the roads under section 336.02. Accordingly, we agree with Ecological Development

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 26, 1982 | Docket: 3255876

Published

law to perform road repair and maintenance. Section 336.02 expressly provides: The county commissioners

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 27, 1981 | Docket: 3255683

Published

conditions set forth in ss. 206.51-206.55, F.S. Section 336.02(1), F.S. (1980 Supp.), makes this refund provision

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 26, 1979 | Docket: 3258104

Published

good repair in the manner provided therein. Section 336.02. See ss. 334.03(23), which defines the county

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 1, 1979 | Docket: 3255203

Published

by general law. . . . (Emphasis supplied.) Section 336.02, F. S., vests the control of county roads,