Syfert Injury Law Firm

In re Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-02-01

Citation: 948 So. 2d 735, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 79, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 132, 2007 WL 268753

Snippet: amended to conform to requirement in sections 744,362(1) and 744.3675, Florida Statutes, to file initial

O'Hare v. Hamric

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-02

Citation: 868 So. 2d 687, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4340

Snippet: section 744.3215(3)(g). Pursuant to sections 744.362(1) and 744.363 and Florida Probate Rule 5.690(1),

In Re Guardianship of Sapp

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-02

Citation: 868 So. 2d 687, 2004 WL 690568

Snippet: section 744.3215(3)(g). Pursuant to sections 744.362(1) and 744.363 and Florida Probate Rule 5.690(1),

Davis v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-10-22

Citation: 606 So. 2d 734, 1992 WL 301304

Snippet: 4th DCA 1979). [8] Pursuant to Florida Statute § 362.01.

In re Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-09-24

Citation: 607 So. 2d 1306, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 636, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1622, 1992 WL 249483

Snippet: (b) to conform to 1992 amendment to section 744,362(1), Florida Statutes. Citation form changes in committee

Vidaurre ex rel. Vidaurre v. Florida Power & Light Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-13

Citation: 556 So. 2d 533, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 889

Snippet: installation. See generally §§ 125.42, 337.401, 362.01, Fla.Stat. (1987). Instead, say appellants, the

Florida Power & Light Co. v. MacIas by MacIas

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-01-13

Citation: 507 So. 2d 1113, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 253

Snippet: Keeton, § 30, at 164. Ileana contends that section 362.01, Florida Statutes (1983), creates a special duty

Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Fairbanks

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-07-01

Citation: 400 So. 2d 550

Snippet: DCA 1972) and The 1661 Corp. v. Snyder, 267 So.2d 362 (1 DCA 1972). 22. Also, as stated in 58 AmJur 2d 213

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-11-26

Snippet: by express legislative authority. See e.g., s. 362.01, F. S., which permits a chartered telegraph or

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-07-11

Snippet: benefit amounts ($9.50 and $14.50) set in s. 112.362(1)(a) and (4)(a), 1978 Supp., as amended by the same

Madden v. Florala Telephone Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-09-21

Citation: 362 So. 2d 475, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17236

Snippet: maintained the road for more than four years. *477§ 362.01, Florida Statutes (1975), provides as follows:

Gulf Properties of Alabama, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-06-13

Citation: 346 So. 2d 1085, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16087

Snippet: appellant’s complaint with prejudice. Florida Statute 362.01 is controlling. It does not, in my view, prohibit

McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. v. Gill

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-07-31

Citation: 281 So. 2d 384, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7664

Snippet: 1972); and 1661 Corporation v. Snyder, 267 So.2d 362 (1 Fla.App. 1972). RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and CARROLL

George W. Davis & Sons, Inc. v. Raffield

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-11-14

Citation: 269 So. 2d 383, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5879

Snippet: JOHNSON, J., concur. . Hutson v. Knabb, 212 So.2d 362 (1 Fla.App.1968). . Under the circumstances in this

Pinellas County v. General Telephone Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-12-03

Citation: 229 So. 2d 9, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6456

Snippet: relating to the applicability of F.S. §§ 338.17-21 and 362.01, F.S.A. It affirmatively alleged that it maintained

Twin Cities Cable Co. v. Southeastern Telephone Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-06-22

Citation: 200 So. 2d 857, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4564

Snippet: JOHNSON, Judge. The above two cases have been consolidated for purpose of appeal and argument. Identical issues were raised and identical pleadings, except as to names of the parties plaintiff and locations, filed. Identical orders of dismissal and final judgments entered. It is from these final judgments, this appeal is taken. The appellants, who were plaintiffs below, brought their respective complaints against the appellee as defendant below, alleging in substance that the defendant is a public

General Telephone Co. of Florida v. City of Bradenton

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-12-07

Citation: 192 So. 2d 534, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4664

Snippet: public right-of-way. We agree with appellant that § 362.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides this right subject

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State Ex Rel. Ervin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-11-19

Citation: 75 So. 2d 796

Snippet: roads or highways" within the purview of Section 362.01, F.S. 1951, F.S.A., hereafter more particularly

Ex parte Biggers

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1923-03-15

Citation: 85 Fla. 322, 95 So. 763, 1923 Fla. LEXIS 580

Snippet: 159; In re Hayes, 72 Fla. 558, 73 South. Rep. 362. 1 The statements with reference to- the Judge found

Linton v. Walker

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1858-07-01

Citation: 8 Fla. 144

Snippet: ” This was the case of an uncle. — 5 B. Monroe, 362; 1 AS., 183. “ The allowance to guardians, and those