Cases from cite.case.law:

FLORIDA INTEREXCHANGE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION, v. M. BEARD,, 624 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 1993)

. . . FIXCA urges that under the plain meaning of section 364.335 the Commission had no authority to divest . . . See § 364.335(3), Fla.Stat.(Supp.1990). We agree. . . . Thus, GTEFL’s application does not fall under the “new certificate” scope of section 364.335. . . . Therefore, we hold that the Commission erred in using section 364.335 to restrict competition over the . . . Section 364.335(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), provides in pertinent part: The commission may not . . .

INTERNATIONAL TELECHARGE, INC. v. McK. WILSON,, 573 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1991)

. . . . § 364.335(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . Id. § 364.335(5). The PSC certified ITI and its proposed tariff in September 1987. . . . No. 101-435, 104 Stat. 986 (1990). .Section 364.335(5), Florida Statutes (1989), provides: Revocation . . .

AT T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTHERN STATES, INC. v. R. MARKS,, 515 So. 2d 741 (Fla. 1987)

. . . For the issues in dispute here, the PSC’s licensing power arises chiefly from section 364.335(4), Florida . . . See § 364.335(4). . . . . § 364.335(4). See US. Sprint Communications Co. v. . . . See § 364.335, Fla. Stat. (1985). , Order No. 12765, Fla. Public Service Commission (Dec. 9, 1983). . . . issue of whether local access lines constitute local exchange service within the meaning of section 364.335 . . . monopolistic local exchange service, as PSC maintains, this bypass provision would be contrary to section 364.335 . . .

CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC. v. CITY GAS COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., 665 F. Supp. 1493 (S.D. Fla. 1987)

. . . . § 364.335-.337), and water and sewer utilities (Fla.Stat. § 367.041-.055),2 3****** and to resolve . . . The relevant portion of Fla.Stat. § 364.335 (1985) provides as follows: Application for certificate. . . .

U. S. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, v. R. MARKS, MICROTEL, INC. v. R. MARKS,, 509 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1987)

. . . Service Commission, 483 So.2d 415 (Fla.1986) (Mi-crotel II), we further explained that when section 364.335 . . . Third, while we found that section 364.335(4) provided that PSC may grant a certificate for providing . . . We also rejected the appellants’ claim that section 364.335(4) contained no guidelines or standards to . . . claim that the PSC had represented to this Court in Microtel I that it had no authority under section 364.335 . . . In Microtel I, 464 So.2d at 1191, we held that the first step in the certification process, section 364.335 . . .

MICROTEL, INC. v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, GTE SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,, 483 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 1986)

. . . In Florida the authority for monopoly telephone service was section 364.335(4), Florida Statutes (1981 . . . the legislature, in March 1982, enacted chapter 82-51, section 3, Laws of Florida, amending section 364.335 . . . They contend that PSC has no authority under section 364.335(4) to grant toll monopolies on long distance . . . Third, section 364.335(4), as amended, provides that PSC may grant a certificate in the public interest . . . Appellants next contend that section 364.335(4), assuming that it permits monopolies in long distance . . .

MICROTEL, INC. v. FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION,, 464 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 1985)

. . . As the Commission urges, we find that sections 364.335 and 364.337, taken together, provide for a two-step . . . The first step, governed by section 364.335, requires the Commission to make an initial decision whether . . . In the instant situation, the legislature has provided standards and guidelines in section 364.335(1) . . . BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur. . 364.335 Application for . . .