Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 366.031 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 366.031 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 366.031

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXVII
RAILROADS AND OTHER REGULATED UTILITIES
Chapter 366
PUBLIC UTILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 366.031
366.031 Definitions; preference relating to cable television prohibited; penalties.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Affiliate,” when used in relation to any person, means another person who owns or controls, is owned or controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with, such person.
(b) “Cable service” means:
1. The one-way transmission to subscribers of video programming or any other programming service; and
2. Subscriber interaction, if any, which is required for the selection of such video programming or other programming service.
(c) “Cable system” means a facility, consisting of a set of closed transmission paths and associated signal generation, reception, and control equipment that is designed to provide cable service which includes video programming and which is provided to multiple subscribers within a community, but such term does not include:
1. A facility that serves only to retransmit the television signals of one or more television broadcast stations;
2. A facility that serves only subscribers in one or more multiple-unit dwellings under common ownership, control, or management, unless such facility or facilities uses any public right-of-way;
3. A facility of a common carrier, except that such facility shall be considered a cable system to the extent such facility is used in the transmission of video programming directly to subscribers; or
4. Any facilities of any electric utility used solely for operating its electric utility systems.
(d) “Video programming” means programming provided by or generally considered comparable to programming provided by a television broadcast station or cable system.
(2) No electric utility shall make or give any preference or advantage to any person as an accommodation or inducement to that person to contract with or take the services of any entity which is an affiliate of such electric utility and which entity provides video programming to persons within all or any part of the service area of such electric utility.
(3) No electric utility shall make or give any preference or advantage over any entity which is not an affiliate of such electric utility, and which entity provides video programming to persons within all or any part of the service area of such electric utility, to any entity which is an affiliate of such electric utility and which entity provides video programming to persons within all or any part of the service area of such electric utility.
(4) Upon a finding by a court of competent jurisdiction that either any electric utility or its affiliate providing video programming services within all or any part of the service area of the electric utility has violated the provisions of this section, the court:
(a) May award actual damages to any other entity not an affiliate of the electric utility providing video programming services to persons within all or any part of the service area of the electric utility, and may grant injunctive relief.
(b) Shall award costs of any action, together with reasonable attorney’s fees, to the prevailing party.
History.s. 4, ch. 87-266; s. 22, ch. 89-292; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 366.031 on Google Scholar

F.S. 366.031 on Casetext

Amendments to 366.031


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 366.031
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 366.031.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 366.031

Total Results: 4

Uffner Textile Corp. v. Eastern Computers, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-05

Citation: 462 So. 2d 1204, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12250

Snippet: Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 366, 31 So.2d 409, 410 (1947); Driscoll v. Morris, 114

Singleton v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-02-04

Citation: 183 So. 2d 245

Snippet: Top Cab & Baggage Co., etc. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 366, 31 So.2d 409; Mitchell v. Mason, 79 Fla. 140, 83 So

Stephens v. Futch

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-03-24

Citation: 73 Fla. 708, 74 So. 805

Snippet: Russell v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., 36 Minn. 366, 31 N. W. Rep. 692; Brown v. Corbin, 40 Minn. 508,

McNish v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1904-01-15

Citation: 47 Fla. 69

Snippet: support this contention. See State v. Gorham, 67 Vt. 366, 31 Atl. Rep. 845; Franklin v. State, 28 Ala. 9; State