CopyPublished | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
...On appeal, Hernandez argues the trial court erred in denying his motion for
acquittal because the State failed to present sufficient evidence to establish
his guilt.
During trial, the court excluded photographs of the snapper at issue
because they did not comply with section 379.3381, Florida Statutes (2021),
which permits the State to admit into evidence photographs of illegally taken
fish and wildlife. 1 After the State’s case-in-chief, Hernandez moved for
1
Section 379.3381 provides that:
In any prosecution for a violation of this chapter, any
other chapter, or rules of the commission, a
photograph of illegally taken wildlife, freshwater fish,
or salt...
...available, must be introduced into evidence. . . .” Id. However, G.E.G. “has
not been extended beyond controlled substances” to other forms of physical
evidence, Ehrhardt, supra, § 952.1, and we decline to do so here.
Hernandez also relies on § 379.3381, which permits photographic
evidence to be used as competent evidence in prosecutions under Florida’s
Fish and Wildlife Statute, provided the photographs are properly
authenticated....