Florida Statute 381.82 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH

Chapter 381
PUBLIC HEALTH: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 381.82

381.82 Ed and Ethel Moore Alzheimer’s Disease Research Program.—

(1) The Ed and Ethel Moore Alzheimer’s Disease Research Program is created within the Department of Health. The purpose of the program is to fund research leading to prevention of or a cure for Alzheimer’s disease. The long-term goals of the program are to:

(a) Improve the health of Floridians by researching better prevention and diagnoses of and treatments and cures for Alzheimer’s disease.

(b) Expand the foundation of knowledge relating to the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and cure of Alzheimer’s disease.

(2)(a) Funds appropriated for the Ed and Ethel Moore Alzheimer’s Disease Research Program shall be used exclusively for the award of grants and fellowships through a competitive process for research relating to the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and cure of Alzheimer’s disease and for expenses incurred in the administration of this section. Priority shall be granted to research designed to prevent or cure Alzheimer’s disease.

(b) Applications for Alzheimer’s disease research funding under the program may be submitted from any university or established research institute in the state. All qualified investigators in the state, regardless of institution affiliation, shall have equal access and opportunity to compete for research funding. The following types of applications may be considered for funding:

1. Investigator-initiated research grants.

2. Institutional research grants.

3. Predoctoral and postdoctoral research fellowships.

4. Collaborative research grants, including those that advance the finding of cures through basic or applied research.

(3) There is created within the Department of Health the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Grant Advisory Board.

(a) The board shall consist of 11 members appointed by the State Surgeon General. The board shall be composed of two gerontologists, two geriatric psychiatrists, two geriatricians, two neuroscientists, and three neurologists. Initial appointments to the board shall be made by October 1, 2014. The board members shall serve 4-year terms, except that, to provide for staggered terms, five of the initial appointees shall serve 2-year terms and six shall serve 4-year terms. All subsequent appointments shall be for 4-year terms. The chair of the board shall be elected from the membership of the board and shall serve as chair for 2 years. An appointed member may not serve more than two consecutive terms. Appointed members must have experience in Alzheimer’s disease or related biomedical research. The board shall adopt internal organizational procedures as necessary for its efficient organization. The board shall establish and follow rigorous guidelines for ethical conduct and adhere to a strict policy with regard to conflicts of interest. A member of the board may not participate in any discussion or decision of the board or a panel with respect to a research proposal by any firm, entity, or agency with which the member is associated as a member of the governing body or as an employee or with which the member has entered into a contractual arrangement.

(b) The department shall provide such staff, information, and other assistance as is reasonably necessary to assist the board in carrying out its responsibilities. Members of the board shall serve without compensation and may not receive reimbursement for per diem or travel expenses.

(c) The board shall advise the State Surgeon General as to the scope of the research program and shall submit its recommendations for proposals to be funded to the State Surgeon General by December 15 of each year. Grants and fellowships shall be awarded by the State Surgeon General, after consultation with the board, on the basis of scientific merit. Other responsibilities of the board may include, but are not limited to, providing advice on program priorities and emphases; assisting in the development of appropriate linkages to nonacademic entities, such as voluntary organizations, health care delivery institutions, industry, government agencies, and public officials; and developing and providing oversight regarding mechanisms for the dissemination of research results.

(d)1. Applications provided to the board for Alzheimer’s disease research grants under this section, and any records generated by the board relating to review of such applications, except final recommendations, are confidential and exempt from s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution.

2. Those portions of a meeting of the board during which applications for Alzheimer’s disease research grants under this section are discussed are exempt from s. 286.011 and s. 24(b), Art. I of the State Constitution. The closed portion of a meeting must be recorded. The recording shall be maintained by the board and shall be subject to disclosure in accordance with subparagraph 3.

3. Information that is held confidential and exempt under this paragraph may be disclosed with the express written consent of the individual to whom the information pertains or the individual’s legally authorized representative, or by court order upon a showing of good cause.

(4) The board shall submit a fiscal-year progress report on the programs under its purview annually to the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the State Surgeon General by February 15. The report must include:

(a) For each research project supported by grants or fellowships awarded under the program:

1. A summary of the research project and results or expected results of the research.

2. The status of the research project, including whether it has concluded or the estimated date of completion.

3. The amount of the grant or fellowship awarded and the estimated or actual cost of the research project.

4. A list of principal investigators under the research project.

5. The title, citation, and summary of findings of a publication in a peer-reviewed journal resulting from the research.

6. The source and amount of any federal, state, or local government grants or donations or private grants or donations generated as a result of the research project.

7. The status of a patent, if any, generated from the research project and an economic analysis of the impact of the resulting patent.

8. A list of postsecondary educational institutions involved in the research project, a description of each postsecondary educational institution’s involvement in the research project, and the number of students receiving training or performing research under the research project.

(b) The state ranking and total amount of Alzheimer’s disease research funding currently flowing into the state from the National Institutes of Health.

(c) Progress toward programmatic goals, particularly in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and cure of Alzheimer’s disease.

(d) Recommendations to further the mission of the program.

(5) The activities of the board provided in subsection (3) are exempt from chapter 120.

(6) The department may adopt rules as necessary to implement the provisions of this section.

(7) Implementation of the Ed and Ethel Moore Alzheimer’s Disease Research Program is subject to legislative appropriation.

(8) Notwithstanding s. 216.301 and pursuant to s. 216.351, the balance of any appropriation from the General Revenue Fund for the Ed and Ethel Moore Alzheimer’s Disease Research Program which is not disbursed but which is obligated pursuant to contract or committed to be expended by June 30 of the fiscal year in which the funds are appropriated may be carried forward for up to 5 years after the effective date of the original appropriation.

History.—s. 3, ch. 2014-163; s. 1, ch. 2014-164; s. 1, ch. 2016-25; s. 5, ch. 2016-230; s. 1, ch. 2019-27.

F.S. 381.82 on Google Scholar

F.S. 381.82 on Casetext

Amendments to 381.82

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 381.82

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 381.82.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 381.82

Total Results: 20

Pinellas County, Florida v. Gary Joiner, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-27

Snippet: Cauley v. City of Jacksonville, 403 So. 2d 379, 381-82 (Fla. 1981) (noting English precedent supporting

MARK WALLACE v. YANELIN TORRES-RODRIGUEZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-05-11

Snippet: enrichment, Saporta v. Saporta, 766 So.2d 379, 381-82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), and clear and convincing evidence

BRIAN GILLER v. ANITA GROSSMAN, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-09-01

Snippet: 3d DCA 2020); Brigham v. Brigham, 11 So. 3d 374, 381-82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (reviewing de novo interpretation

ANNA HOLLIS v. DAVID HOLLIS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-06-19

Snippet: Id. (comparing Gaber v. Gaber, 536 So. 2d 381, 381-82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), where the court held there

Joshua Brandyn Gaskey v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-21

Citation: 270 So. 3d 1276

Snippet: 2013) (citing Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370, 381-82 (2010)). III.

STUART N. BORNSTEIN and GRANADA, LLC v. IRA A. MARCUS and IRA MARCUS, P.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-08

Citation: 275 So. 3d 636

Snippet: agreement.” St. Joe Corp. v. McIver, 875 So. 2d 375, 381–82 (Fla. 2004). This includes contracts for attorney’s

A. D. v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-26

Citation: 269 So. 3d 642

Snippet: Dep't of Children & Families, 95 So. 3d 378, 381-82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); B.H., Sr. v. Dep't of

State v. Phillips

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-22

Citation: 266 So. 3d 873

Snippet: reasonableness.' " Riley v. California , 573 U.S. 373, 381-82, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014) (quoting

State v. Phillips

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-22

Citation: 266 So. 3d 873

Snippet: reasonableness.' " Riley v. California , 573 U.S. 373, 381-82, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014) (quoting

Arko Plumbing Corp. v. Rudd

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-18

Citation: 230 So. 3d 520

Snippet: not safely able to work on Exxon property. Id. at 381-82. Exxon, when sued (as Arko did) for tortious interference

Maqueira v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-04

Citation: 229 So. 3d 418

Snippet: of discretion); Spencer v. State, 645 So.2d 377, 381-82 (Fla. 1994) (crimes separated by a substantial

Dale Glenn Middleton v. State of Florida – Revised Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-06-01

Snippet: first-degree murder.” Deparvine v. State, 995 So. 2d 351, 381-82 (Fla. 2008) (quoting Foster v. State, 778 So.

Kenneth R. Jackson v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-23

Citation: 213 So. 3d 754, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 361, 2017 WL 1090546, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 648

Snippet: aggravating circumstance. See, e.g., Perez, 919 So. 2d at 381-82 (citing Morton v. State, 789 So. 2d 324, 331 (Fla

Tavares J. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-16

Citation: 213 So. 3d 881, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 343, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 586

Snippet: Sireci, 825 So.2d at 887; Deparvine, 995 So.2d at 381-82. In addition, the previously undiscovered evidence

Dale Glenn Middleton v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-09

Citation: 220 So. 3d 1152, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 624, 2017 WL 930925, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1210

Snippet: first-degree murder.” Deparvine v. State, 995 So.2d 351, 381-82 (Fla. 2008) (quoting Foster v. State, 778 So.2d

Holland v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-02-03

Citation: 210 So. 3d 238, 2017 WL 486955, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1438

Snippet: contain. See generally Brown v. State, 206 So.2d 377, 381-82 (Fla. 1968) (explaining that necessarily-included

Zachary Taylor Wood v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-31

Citation: 209 So. 3d 1217, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 108, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 232

Snippet: required to prove first-degree murder.” Id. at 381-82 (quoting Foster v. State, 778 So.2d 906, 921 (Fla

Tavares J. Wright v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-23

Snippet: Sireci, 825 So. 2d at 887; Deparvine, 995 So. 2d at 381-82. In addition, the previously undiscovered evidence

Ter Keurst v. Ter Keurst

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-14

Citation: 202 So. 3d 123, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15237

Snippet: borrowings and other expenses, the sale netted $131,381.82. The trial court granted each party a $10,000 draw

Peterson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-06-10

Citation: 193 So. 3d 1034, 2016 WL 3199418, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8912

Snippet: judicial review. Barnes v. State, 175 So.3d 380, 381-82 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). The Second District has recently