Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 400.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 400.19 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 400.19

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXIX
PUBLIC HEALTH
Chapter 400
NURSING HOMES AND RELATED HEALTH CARE FACILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 400.19
400.19 Right of entry and inspection.
(1) In accordance with part II of chapter 408, the agency and any of its designated officers or employees or a representative of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program or the local long-term care ombudsman council shall have the right to enter upon and into the premises of any facility licensed pursuant to this part, or any distinct nursing home unit of a hospital licensed under chapter 395 or any freestanding facility licensed under chapter 395 which provides extended care or other long-term care services, at any reasonable time in order to determine the state of compliance with this part, part II of chapter 408, and applicable rules in force pursuant thereto. The agency shall, within 60 days after receipt of a complaint made by a resident or resident’s representative, complete its investigation and provide to the complainant its findings and resolution.
(2) The agency shall coordinate nursing home facility licensing activities and responsibilities of any duly designated officer or employee involved in nursing home facility inspection to assure necessary, equitable, and consistent supervision of inspection personnel without unnecessary duplication of inspections, consultation services, or complaint investigations.
(3) The agency shall conduct periodic, unannounced licensure inspections to determine compliance by the licensee with statutes, and with rules adopted under those statutes, governing minimum standards of construction, quality and adequacy of care, and rights of residents. If the facility has been cited for a class I deficiency or has been cited for two or more class II deficiencies arising from separate surveys or investigations within a 60-day period, or has had three or more substantiated complaints within a 6-month period, each resulting in at least one class I or class II deficiency, the agency shall conduct biannual licensure surveys until the facility has two consecutive licensure surveys without a citation for a Class I or a Class II deficiency. In addition to any other fees or fines in this part, the agency shall assess a fine of $6,000 for the biannual licensure surveys. The agency may adjust such fine by the change in the Consumer Price Index, based on the 12 months immediately preceding the increase, to cover the cost of the additional surveys. The agency shall verify through subsequent inspection that any deficiency identified during inspection is corrected. However, the agency may verify the correction of a class III or class IV deficiency unrelated to resident rights or resident care without reinspecting the facility if adequate written documentation has been received from the facility, which provides assurance that the deficiency has been corrected. The giving or causing to be given of advance notice of such unannounced inspections by an employee of the agency to any unauthorized person shall constitute cause for suspension of not fewer than 5 working days according to chapter 110.
(4) The agency shall conduct unannounced onsite facility reviews following written verification of licensee noncompliance in instances in which a representative of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program or long-term care ombudsman council, pursuant to ss. 400.0071 and 400.0075, has received a complaint and has documented deficiencies in resident care or in the physical plant of the facility that threaten the health, safety, or security of residents, or when the agency documents through inspection that conditions in a facility present a direct or indirect threat to the health, safety, or security of residents. However, the agency shall conduct unannounced onsite reviews every 3 months of each facility while the facility has a conditional license. Deficiencies related to physical plant do not require followup reviews after the agency has determined that correction of the deficiency has been accomplished and that the correction is of the nature that continued compliance can be reasonably expected.
History.s. 18, ch. 69-309; ss. 19, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 17, ch. 70-361; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 5, ch. 76-201; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 35, 36, ch. 79-190; ss. 13, 18, ch. 80-186; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 12, 19, ch. 82-148; ss. 26, 79, 83, ch. 83-181; ss. 21, 30, ch. 93-177; ss. 25, 49, ch. 93-217; s. 14, ch. 99-394; s. 139, ch. 2000-349; s. 59, ch. 2000-367; s. 27, ch. 2001-45; s. 70, ch. 2007-230; s. 24, ch. 2015-31; s. 8, ch. 2020-156.

F.S. 400.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 400.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 400.19


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 400.19
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 400.19.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 400.19

Total Results: 4

Lowe's of Tallahassee v. Giaimo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-11-15

Citation: 552 So. 2d 304, 1989 WL 139126

Snippet: Dr. Sacks' duty to report was imposed by section 400.19(3), Florida Statutes which requires the Department

Desmond v. Medic Ayers Nursing Home

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-07-23

Citation: 492 So. 2d 427, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1612

Snippet: Sacks's duty to report was imposed by Section 400.19(3), Florida Statutes,[3] which requires the Department

Heinlein v. Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-10-19

Citation: 254 So. 2d 50, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5685

Snippet: Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 400; 19 Fla.Jur. Judgments and Decrees § 120 (1958). Affirmed

Super Service Products Corp. v. North Store Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-10-08

Citation: 214 So. 2d 664, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5029

Snippet: Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 400; 19 Fla.Jur., Judgments and Decrees, § 120.