The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . requiring EDS to engage in an administrative procedure to resolve its complaint, or whether Section 402.34 . . . EDS cites a number of cases holding either that statutes similar to section 402.34 provide a remedy in . . . Moreover, section 402.34 expressly gives HRS the power to contract, which obviously includes the power . . . was approved only because the court considered the arbitration code and the predecessor to section 402.34 . . . Section 402.34 provides, in pertinent part, "The department.... shall have the power to contract and . . .
. . . appellant suggests we do, imply from legislation authorizing HRS to be sued in actions ex contrac-tu, see § 402.34 . . .
. . . trial court erred, first, in finding that HRS enjoys complete tort immunity by operation of Section 402.34 . . . Appellants first contend that HRS does not enjoy complete tort immunity under Section 402.34, Florida . . . They further contend that the court’s construction of section 402.34 as authorizing HRS to be barred . . . Our interpretation of section 402.34 is consistent with our recent recognition that section 402.34 does . . . We are urged by appellants to find section 402.34 unconstitutional on the grounds of equal protection . . .
. . . Section 402.34, Florida Stat., which establishes H.R.S. as a corporate body, gives H.R.S. the power to . . . Ostroff s action were in some sense construed as a contract dispute, the Supreme Court has held that § 402.34 . . .
. . . statutorily possessed of the power “to sue and be sued in actions ex contractu but not in torts .. . . ” § 402.34 . . . possessed of subject matter jurisdiction in tort actions, and, contrary to appellants’ contention, § 402.34 . . .
. . . . § 402.34 (1979). 616 F. 2d, at 1363. . . .
. . . . § 402.34 (West Supp.1979). . . . Pursuant to its corporate powers as outlined in section 402.34, Florida DHRS drafted and executed a contract . . .
. . . . § 402.34 (1979). . . .
. . . This represented the proceeds of the exercise of the “put” of $1,153,839.84 (including $2,-402.34 interest . . .
. . . The survey for the map, plaintiff’s Exhibit 1, makes the length of this line 402.34 feet, and the surface . . .