Cases from cite.case.law:

ARTHUR, v. C. MILSTEIN, Ad K., 949 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . In finding that both were legally authorized, Florida Statute section 406.50(4) directs that priority . . . legally authorized person claims a body in the custody of the medical examiner for interment, section 406.50 . . . The trial court relied upon section 406.50(4) to determine that Dannielynn had priority over Arthur. . . . Arthur’s position is that dependence on section 406.50(4) was error in this case as she is the sole “ . . . We find that neither section 497.005(37), nor section 406.50, control the outcome of this case, which . . .

In R. CALIRI, v. R., 335 B.R. 2 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2005)

. . . Based upon his testimony, his total loss of product was $406.50 and his total loss of cash was $68. . . . Hancock established that the value of the products in the machines at Gateway totaled $406.50 and that . . .

In A. THOMPSON, HUGGINS, v. A. THOMPSON,, 166 B.R. 849 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1994)

. . . Plan $2,476.00 Fidelity Freedom Retirement Growth Keogh $1,146.00 12 shares Reebok, International $406.50 . . . , either used the money personally or placed the funds in his IRA: 12 shares Reebok, International $406.50 . . .

BASF WYANDOTTE CORP. v. THE UNITED STATES,, 855 F.2d 852 (Fed. Cir. 1988)

. . . The provision covering dyes was initially found at item 406.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United . . . Item 406.50, TSUS (1980) reads: Colors, dyes and stains (except toner), whether soluble or not in water . . . The trial court found that Bafixans are not dyes and may not be classified under either item 406.50 or . . . of certain Bafixans in the Appendix was based on their previous classification by Customs under item 406.50 . . . Bafixans were found to be inks, not dyes, by the trial court, they were improperly classified under items 406.50 . . .

USA, v., 12 Ct. Int'l Trade 112 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . manufactured in whole or in part from any product provided for in subpart A or B of this part: # % % ‡ H: 406.50 . . . the toner and developer are alternatively classifiable as colors, dyes and stains, under TSUS item 406.50 . . .

TOMOEGAWA USA, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 681 F. Supp. 867 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1988)

. . . derived or manufactured in whole or in part from any product provided for in subpart A or B of this part: 406.50 . . . the toner and developer are alternatively classifiable as colors, dyes and stains, under TSUS item 406.50 . . .

BASF v., 11 Ct. Int'l Trade 652 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1987)

. . . Item 406.50, TSUS (1980) reads as follows: Color, dyes and stains (except toner), whether soluable or . . . After July 1, 1980, item 406.50 was eliminated from the TSUS, and Bafixans were classified under items . . . 409.90-92, TSUS which added to the above quoted language of item 406.50, the additional words: Other . . . Plaintiff argues that Bafixans are not dyes and may not be classified under either item 406.50 or items . . . As of July 1, 1980, American Selling Price (ASP) valuation of products classified under item 406.50 was . . .

BASF WYANDOTTE CORP. v. UNITED STATES,, 674 F. Supp. 1477 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1987)

. . . Item 406.50, TSUS (1980) reads as follows: Color, dyes and stains (except toner), whether soluable or . . . After July 1,1980, item 406.50 was eliminated from the TSUS, and Bafixans were classified under items . . . 409.90-92, TSUS which added to the above quoted language of item 406.50, the additional words: Other . . . Plaintiff argues that Bafixans are not dyes and may not be classified under either item 406.50 or items . . . As of July 1,1980, American Selling Price (ASP) valuation of products classified under item 406.50 was . . .

CORPORACION SUBLISTATICA, S. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 511 F. Supp. 805 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)

. . . Upon liquidation the merchandise was classified under item 406.50, TSUS, providing: SCHEDULE 4. - CHEMICALS . . . AND RELATED PRODUCTS Part 1. - Benzenoid Chemicals and Products 406.50 Colors, dyes, and stains (except . . .

S. A. v., 1 Ct. Int'l Trade 120 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1981)

. . . Upon liquidation the merchandise was classified under item 406.50, TSUS, providing: Schedule 4 — Chemicals . . . and Related Products PART 1-BENZENOID CHEMICALS AND PRODUCTS 406.50 Colors, dyes, and stains (except . . . In support of the classification of the imported powders as a dye under item 406.50, TSITS, the defendant . . .

UNITED STATES, v. MORAY CHEMICAL CORPORATION,, 576 F.2d 368 (C.C.P.A. 1978)

. . . manufactured in whole or in part from any product provided for in sub-part A or B of this part........ 406.50 . . . Mobay further argues that the pastes cannot be classified within items 406.50 or 406.70 because the pastes . . . The pastes, however, also fall within the description of “Colors, dyes, and stains,” item 406.50, and . . . the pastes are used only as coloring agents, the proper classification should be under either item 406.50 . . . On this appeal, the competing provisions are 406.50 and 406.70 on the one side and 405.25 on the other . . .

v., 65 C.C.P.A. 53 (C.C.P.A. 1978)

. . . * * * * * * * 405. 25 Plastics materials_ Colors, dyes, stains, and related products: * * * * * * * 406.50 . . . Mobay further argues that the pastes cannot be classified within items 406.50 or 406.70 because the pastes . . . The pastes, however, also fall within the description of “Colors, dyes, and stains,” item 406.50, and . . . ) and pesticides (item 405.15), we rest our decision, in the present case on consideration of items 406.50 . . . On this appeal, the competing provisions are 406.50 and 406.70 on the one side and 405.25 on the other . . .

GEIGY CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 358 F. Supp. 1275 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . T.D. 54521). d) was advisorily classified by the Appraiser at the rate of 40% ad valorem, under Item 406.50 . . .

Co. v., 70 Cust. Ct. 259 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . T.D. 54521). d) was advisorily classified by the Appraiser at the rate of 40% ad valorem, under Item 406.50 . . .

v., 69 Cust. Ct. 26 (Cust. Ct. 1972)

. . . An original claim in the protests for classification pursuant to item 406.50 as “colors, dyes, and stains . . .

v., 61 Cust. Ct. 409 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . In liquidation, duty was assessed on the appraised value of the dyes at 40% ad valorem under item 406.50 . . .

WEBER v. KAVANAGH,, 52 F. Supp. 619 (E.D. Mich. 1943)

. . . receipt of interest on bank balances and taxes refunded of $699.07, rents collected $400, and profit of $406.50 . . .

In CASAUDOUMECQ, 46 F. Supp. 718 (S.D. Cal. 1942)

. . . Other witnesses fixed the value at $8,500, $11,-406.50, $11,024, and $10,604, respectively. . . .