Cases from cite.case.law:

OCEAN HARBOR CASUALTY INSURANCE, v. MSPA CLAIMS,, 261 So. 3d 637 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 411.24(f) is Invalid. . . . . § 411.24(f) in support of its broad preemption argument. 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(f) provides that Medicare . . . More importantly, however, § 411.24(f) was declared invalid in Health Ins. . . . In Shalala, an insurance association claimed § 411.24(f) exceeded the statutory authority delegated to . . . After reviewing the controlling statutes, the court agreed 411.24(f) was void. . . .

A. NETRO, v. GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., 891 F.3d 522 (4th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 411.24(h) (providing that a beneficiary who receives a primary payment "must reimburse Medicare within . . .

MSPA CLAIMS I, LLC, v. TENET FLORIDA, INC., 318 F. Supp. 3d 1349 (S.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 411.24, which is entitled "Recovery of Conditional Payments" and states under Section (c) "Amount . . . Second, Plaintiff claims that 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h) requires that reimbursement be tendered within 60 . . . While it is true that 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h) states that "[i]f the beneficiary or other party receives . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(m). . . . (DE 26 at 4, citing 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g) and 422.108(f) ). Again, they cite to Humana Med. . . .

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GUERRERA,, 300 F. Supp. 3d 367 (D. Conn. 2018)

. . . 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations (" section 411.24(g)"), which states that "CMS has a right of . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24. . . . (citing section 411.24(i) )). . . . (citing section 411.24(i) )). . . . See id. § 411.24(i)(1). . . .

HUMANA MEDICAL PLAN, INC. v. WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 832 F.3d 1229 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 411.24 (describing a Government cause of action against a primary plan or any other person that received . . . and one against any entity (including a beneficiary) that receives a primary payment. 42 C.F.R. §§ 411.24 . . . (e), 411.24(g). . . . reimburse Medicare even though it has already reimbursed the beneficiary or other party*” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . See id. § 411.24(i)(l). . . .

SEXTON, v. MEDICARE,, 194 F. Supp. 3d 209 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . . § 411.24(b). . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g) (“CMS has a right of action to recover its payments from any entity, including . . . . compensation, any liability or no-fault insurance, or an employer group health plan,” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g) (“CMS has a right of action to recover its payments from any entity, including . . .

HUMANA INSURANCE CO. v. PARIS BLANK LLP,, 187 F. Supp. 3d 676 (E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . . § 411.24(g). . . .

UNITED STATES EX REL. Dr. TAKEMOTO, v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., 157 F. Supp. 3d 273 (W.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . . § 411.24(h). . . . reimburse Medicare even though it has already reimbursed the beneficiary or other party.” 42 C.F.R. §§ 411.24 . . .

JOERG, Jr. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., 176 So. 3d 1247 (Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 411.24(g) (2014); U.S. v. Harris, No. 5:08CV102, 2009 WL 891931, at *3, *5 (N.D.W.Va. . . .

HUMANA MEDICAL PLAN, INC. v. WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 94 F. Supp. 3d 1285 (S.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . . § 411.24(h). . . . reimburse Medicare even though it has already reimbursed the beneficiary or other party.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . .

HUMANA INSURANCE COMPANY, v. FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 95 F. Supp. 3d 983 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . . § 411.24(f)(1) ("CMS may recover without regard to any claims filing requirements that the insurance . . . program or plan imposes on the beneficiaiy or other claimant”); 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(c) (providing amount . . .

J. ROOD, v. NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND, 39 F. Supp. 3d 241 (N.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . . § 411.24(e), (g). . . .

HARO G. v. SEBELIUS,, 729 F.3d 993 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 411.24(g) (Medicare “has a right of action to recover its payments from any entity, including a beneficiary . . . represents direct application of the Secretary’s interpretation of her authority under 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . Because 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g) provides that Medicare “has a right of action to recover its payments from . . . And 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h) states that “[i]f the beneficiary or other party receives a primary payment . . . Whether we analyze 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g) individually, or in conjunction with 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h) is . . .

HARO G. v. SEBELIUS,, 747 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 411.24(g) (Medicare “has a right of action to recover its payments from any entity, including a beneficiary . . . represents direct application of the Secretary’s interpretation of her authority under 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . Because 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g) provides that'Medieare “has a right of action to recover its payments from . . . And 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h) states that “[i]f the beneficiary or other party receives a primary payment . . . Whether we analyze 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g) individually, or in conjunction with 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h) is . . .

UNITED STATES, v. STRICKER,, 524 F. App'x 500 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 411.24(g). . . . See also 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(i)(l) (“If Medicare is not reimbursed as required ... the primary payer must . . . In relevant part, 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(e) gives the government “a direct right of action to recover from . . . The import of these regulatory provisions, § 411.22(b) and § 411.24(b) — which have not been challenged . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(i)(2). . . . .

CALDERA, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA,, 716 F.3d 861 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 411.24(¿). . . .

SIPLER v. TRANS AM TRUCKING, INC. C., 881 F. Supp. 2d 635 (D.N.J. 2012)

. . . State agency or private insurer that has received a primary payment” may also be held liable. 42 CFR § 411.24 . . .

HADDEN, v. UNITED STATES, 661 F.3d 298 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 411.24(c), 411.37(c). As observed by the majority, in Zinman v. . . .

WILSON, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 795 F. Supp. 2d 604 (W.D. Ky. 2011)

. . . . § 411.24(h). . . . . § 411.24(i)(l) (stating “If Medicare is not reimbursed ..., the primary payer must reimburse Medicare . . . See 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b)(2) and 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(0(1). . . .

HARO G. a v. SEBELIUS,, 789 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (D. Ariz. 2011)

. . . . § 411.24(h)). . . . reimburse Medicare even though it has already reimbursed the beneficiary or other party.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . defined an entity as “a supplier, beneficiary, attorney, State agency, or private insurer.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . entity” to include: “a supplier, beneficiary, attorney, State agency, or private insurer.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h) and (i)(l). . . .

N. BENSON, v. SEBELIUS,, 771 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . § 411.24. . . . Id. § 411.24(h). . . . . § 411.24(m)(2)(i)-(ii). . . .

BOSS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U. S. A. INC., 333 F. App'x 531 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . components” and “provide[s] the desired shape and structure of the seat,” '317 patent col.2 11.23-25; col.411.24 . . .

PROTOCOLS, LLC, LLC LLC, v. O. LEAVITT, N., 549 F.3d 1294 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 411.24, although CMS may waive its rights in the best interests of Medicare, see 42 U.S.C. § 1395y . . .

B. STALLEY, UNITED STATES v. CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES, a a a a a SPC, a B. v. LLC, a a a a a a, 509 F.3d 517 (8th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 411.24(g) (government has right of action against beneficiary that has received primary payment); . . .

GLOVER, a v. LIGGETT GROUP, INC. USA,, 459 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § ]411.24(i), a ‘third party payer’ may be required to reimburse Medicare if it paid a provider or . . .

GLOVER v. PHILIP MORRIS USA,, 380 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . § 411.24(h) (2004) (“If the beneficiary or other party receives a third party payment, the beneficiary . . .

FRAZER, a v. CNA INSURANCE COMPANY,, 374 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (N.D. Ala. 2005)

. . . For example, 42 C.F.R. 411.24 establishes procedure for recovery of erroneous payments. 42 C.F.R. 411.25 . . . the courts offer a wide variety of options through which Medicare can pursue reimbursement. 42 C.F.R. 411.24 . . .

POLLO OPERATIONS, INC. v. G. TRIPP,, 906 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . . § 411.24(i)(2). . . . . § 411.24(h), then “the third party payer must reimburse Medicare even though it has already reimbursed . . . the beneficiary or other party.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(0(1). . . .

ESTATE OF URSO, v. G. THOMPSON, U. S., 309 F. Supp. 2d 253 (D. Conn. 2004)

. . . . §§ 411.21 (defining “conditional payment”), 411.24 (recovery of conditional payments), 411.52 (conditional . . .

C. FANNING, a v. THE UNITED STATES H. G. R. B. Jr. Dr. H. M. D. M. P. H. J. E. Jr. PNC N. A. G., 346 F.3d 386 (3d Cir. 2003)

. . . Interest will be calculated at the rate of 13.75% per annum in accordance with 42 C.F.R. 411.24(m). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, 345 F.3d 866 (11th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 411.24. . . . Under § 411.24®, a “third party payer” may be required to reimburse Medicare if it paid a provider or . . . The pertinent regulations to which we owe deference are codified at 42 C.F.R. §§ 411.24(c)(1) and (c) . . . The Government cited the regulations in its Complaint, but did not rely on § 411.24(c) in its briefs . . . The agency’s implementing regulation, 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g), lists as examples of entities liable as . . .

In SILICONE GEL BREAST IMPLANTS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL v., 174 F. Supp. 2d 1242 (N.D. Ala. 2001)

. . . . § 411.24(e) & (g). . . . It argues that under § 411.24(i)(l) it may collect a second payment from liability insurance companies . . . In explaining § 411.24(c), HCFA said “any claimant may seek double damages from any entity responsible . . . The entities listed in § 411.24(g) are typical “final recipients” of third party payments. . . . (h), 411.24©. . . .

In ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. C. v. v., 202 F.R.D. 154 (E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . Interest will be calculated at the rate of 13.75% per annum in accordance with 42 C.F.R. 411.24(m). . . .

FILIPPI Co- v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 138 F. Supp. 2d 545 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . . § 411.24(g) Medicare is also entitled to a setoff of third-party payments made to a state Medicaid . . . See id. at § 411.24(j). . . . See id. at § 1395y(b)(2)(B)(i); 42 C.F.R. §§ 411.24, 411.52 (2001). . . .

In DOW CORNING CORPORATION,, 255 B.R. 445 (E.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . . §§ 411.21, 411.24(e), (g). . . .

In DOW CORNING CORPORATION,, 250 B.R. 298 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2000)

. . . . § 411.24(i)(2)). . . . As for the MSPA, the United States cited 42 C.F.R. § 411.24. . . . . § 411.24(i)(l). . . . that payment for such item or service has been or could be made under [paragraph 2(A)].”); 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . party payment, the beneficiary or other party must reimburse Medicare within 60 days.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . .

O. COX, v. E. SHALALA, a, 112 F.3d 151 (4th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 411.24(e). . . .

M. DENEKAS R. D. De Co- D. v. E. SHALALA,, 943 F. Supp. 1073 (S.D. Iowa 1996)

. . . . § 411.24(g); 411.26. . . . Id. at 843; see 42 C.F.R. §§ 411.24(c), .37(c). . . . conditional payments when the beneficiary’s settlement is less than the total damages. 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . .

ZINMAN M. A. G. a v. E. SHALALA,, 67 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 411.24(c). . . .

HEALTH INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. v. E. SHALALA, BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, v. E. SHALALA,, 23 F.3d 412 (D.C. Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 411.24(e). . . . HCFA’s “third party administrator” regulation, 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(e), also effects a substantive change . . . By holding third party administrators liable for repayment of conditional Medicare payments, § 411.24 . . . Consequently, the government could not validly apply 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(e) to claims and payments made . . . As to the court’s holding that HCFA’s “third party administrator” regulation, 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(e), . . . . § 411.24(i)), the mandatory notice regulation (42 C.F.R. § 411.25(a)) and the carve out coverage regulation . . . the claims filing regulation (42 C.F.R. § 411.-24©) and third-party liability regulation (42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . “an employer, an insurance carrier, plan, or program, and a third party administrator.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . The appellants also challenge 42 CFR § 411.24(i), which they have dubbed “the double-payment regulation . . . C. 4.2 CFR § 411.24(f) — override of claims procedures. . . . The final regulation challenged by both appellants is 42 CFR § 411.24(f), which asserts that Medicare . . . Conclusion To sum up, we agree with the appellants that 42 CFR §§ 411.24© and 411.24(e) go beyond the . . . But we reject the appellants’ facial challenges to §§ 411.-32(a)(1), 411.25, and 411.24(i). . . .

ZINMAN, v. SHALALA,, 835 F. Supp. 1163 (N.D. Cal. 1993)

. . . . § 411.24(g) HCFA has a right to seek recovery of third party payments from attorneys. . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. GEIER, M., 816 F. Supp. 1332 (W.D. Wis. 1993)

. . . . § 411.24(g) and § 411.26 clarify the United States’ sub-rogation right and its right to file suit against . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. SOSNOWSKI, D. J., 822 F. Supp. 570 (W.D. Wis. 1993)

. . . . § 411.24, entitled “Recovery of conditional payments,” provides in part: (g) Recovery from parties . . . entity, including a beneficiary or an attorney, which has received a third party payment. 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(h). . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(g). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 815 F. Supp. 521 (D. Conn. 1992)

. . . . § 411.24; 54 Fed.Reg. No. 195 at 41738-40 (Oct. 11, 1989). . . .

BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION, v. W. SULLIVAN, HEALTH INSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. v. W. SULLIVAN,, 794 F. Supp. 1166 (D.D.C. 1992)

. . . . § 411.24(i) is arbitrary and capricious. I. . . . (e) Both plaintiffs challenge 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(e) which states: Recovery from third parties. . . . Under step two, the court cannot find that section 411.24(e) is an unreasonable interpretation of the . . . (f) Plaintiffs also challenge 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(f), which provides: Claims filing requirements. (1) . . . ® Plaintiffs also assert that 42 C.F.R. § 411.24(i) violates the APA. . . .

PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES W. M. D. UNITED STATES v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,, 740 F. Supp. 492 (E.D. Tenn. 1990)

. . . . § 411.24; 54 Fed.Reg. No. 195 at 41738 (Oct. 11, 1989). . . . party payment, the beneficiary or other party must reimburse Medicare within 60 days.” 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . . HCFA has a right of recovery against any entity which has received a third party payment. 42 C.F.R. § 411.24 . . .

B. LOONEY, J. v. UNITED STATES, 569 F. Supp. 1569 (M.D. Ga. 1983)

. . . a result of his death, decedent’s surviving spouse, Reta, was entitled to and received payments of $411.24 . . .

JOHN N. KNAUFF CO. INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 78 Ct. Cl. 423 (Ct. Cl. 1933)

. . . having payments due under the contract withheld, at an additional expense plus a reasonable profit of $411.24 . . .

a v., 94 Fla. 586 (Fla. 1927)

. . . in that it found for the plaintiff in the sum claimed together with interest in the further sum of $411.24 . . .