Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 413.40 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 413.40 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 413.40

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXX
SOCIAL WELFARE
Chapter 413
EMPLOYMENT AND RELATED SERVICES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 413.40
413.40 Powers of division; independent living program.The division, in administering a program to provide independent living services to persons who have significant disabilities, shall be authorized, contingent upon available funding, to:
(1) Employ necessary personnel and consultants.
(2) Contract with any public or private entity, including centers for independent living, to provide independent living services in accordance with the state plan for independent living.
History.s. 4, ch. 59-385; s. 13, ch. 65-239; s. 318, ch. 77-147; s. 14, ch. 87-227; s. 6, ch. 88-214; s. 24, ch. 94-324; s. 6, ch. 2010-70.
Note.Former ss. 229.44, 229.0124.

F.S. 413.40 on Google Scholar

F.S. 413.40 on Casetext

Amendments to 413.40


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 413.40
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 413.40.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

S. ROGERS, v. KEFFER, INC. d b a d b a LLC, LLC,, 243 F. Supp. 3d 650 (E.D.N.C. 2017)

. . . By letter dated January 28, 2016, and mailed to Rogers, Chase demanded that Rogers pay $413.40. . . .

SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, v. E. PRICE, U. S., 239 F. Supp. 3d 237 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . . § 413.40. . . .

WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICORP, v. BURWELL, U. S., 813 F.3d 357 (D.C. Cir. 2015)

. . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4)®-(ii) (2003). . . . Id. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii). . . . Id. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(A)(I). . . . Id. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(B). . . . Nothing in § 413.40 compels this Court to adopt Fayetteville’s reading. . . .

WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICORP, v. BURWELL, U. S., 421 U.S. App. D.C. 177 (D.C. Cir. 2015)

. . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4)(i)-(ii) (2003). . . . Id. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii). . . . Id. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(A)(I). . . . Nothing in § 413.40 compels this Court to adopt Fayetteville’s reading. . . . Reg. 49,982, 50,103-04 (Aug. 1, 2002) (“In accordance with existing §§ 413.40(c)(4)(h) ... . . .

WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICORP v. BURWELL, U. S., 72 F. Supp. 3d 159 (D.D.C. 2014)

. . . . § 413.40(c)(4). So far, so good. . . . Id. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(A). . . . Id. § 413.40(e)(4)(iii)(B). . . . Id. § 413.40(e)(4)(iii). . . . See id. at 16; 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii). . . .

SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, v. PRESS GANEY ASSOCIATES, INC., 923 F. Supp. 2d 897 (S.D. Miss. 2013)

. . . . § 413.40(a)(3). . . . .

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 496 F. App'x 526 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 413.40. . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4)(i)-(ii). . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii). . . . . § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(A). . . . . § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(B). . . .

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, v. SEBELIUS,, 650 F.3d 685 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . . § 413.40(g)(1)(H). B The University of Texas operates a cancer hospital, the M.D. . . .

ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL v. SECRETARY OF UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 417 F. App'x 171 (3d Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 413.40(c)(4)(iii). . . . interplay between subsections (b)(3)(A) & (b)(3)(H) of 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww, CMS’s regulations at 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . reasonable to explicitly incorporate the BBA cap into the meaning of “target amount” through 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . .

BEACON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. DBA v. LEAVITT,, 629 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 413.40(g)(l)(iii), the PRRB concluded that the Secretary was prohibited from making the adjustment . . . rate-of-increase ceiling” before the Secretary will make a § 1395ww(b)(4)(A) adjustment. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . operating costs beyond the TEFRA ceiling” and not an “increase in potential operating costs.” 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . correctly determined that Beacon was not eligible for a TEFRA target cost adjustment under 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . on the merits, holding Beacon was not entitled to a TEFRA target cost adjustment under 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . .

HARDY WILSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. SEBELIUS, In In, 616 F.3d 449 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 413.40(a)(3). Reimbursements could not exceed the ceiling. . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4)(i)-(ii). . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4)(iii). . . . . § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(A). . . . . § 413.40(c)(4)(iii)(B). . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 92 Fed. Cl. 798 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . Put another way, without actuarial gains and losses that were being amortized in accordance with CAS 413.40 . . .

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, v. SEBELIUS,, 706 F. Supp. 2d 97 (D.D.C. 2010)

. . . . § 413.40. . . . See generally 42 C.F.R. § 413.40. . . . hospital services, that would result in a “significant distortion in the operating costs.” 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . be granted for certain factors, including “a change in the inpatient hospital services.” 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . The Clerk of Court CLOSE this case. . 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g)(3) provides, in relevant part: (i) Adjustment . . .

ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, v. SEBELIUS,, 660 F. Supp. 2d 73 (D.D.C. 2009)

. . . . § 413.40(b)(l)(i) (hereafter “subsection (i)”), states that once a TEFRA target amount is established . . . The second provision, 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(b)(1)(h) (hereafter “subsection (ii)”), states that the base . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(f). . . . Section 413.40(f) defines a "new hospital” as "a provider of hospital inpatient services that (A) [h] . . . Id. § 413.40(f)(l)(ii). . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 84 Fed. Cl. 129 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . those transferred as part of a segment closing transaction, in computing pension costs pursuant to CAS 413.40 . . .

SAINT MARYS HOSPITAL OF ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA, v. O. LEAVITT,, 535 F.3d 802 (8th Cir. 2008)

. . . . § 413.40. . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e)(1). . . . Pri- or to October 1, 1995, and thus during Saint Marys’s 1994 cost reporting period, § 413.40(e)(1) . . . To “clarify” the ambiguity, CMS proposed an amendment to § 413.40(e)(1) in June 1995. See 60 Fed. . . . In sum, regardless of the 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e)(1) version applied, Saint Mar-ys’s appeal fails. . . .

CENTRAL MAINE MEDICAL CENTER, v. O. LEAVITT,, 552 F. Supp. 2d 50 (D. Me. 2008)

. . . . §'413.40(b)(1) & (c)(3). . . . (F) The manipulation of discharges to increase reimbursement. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g). 6.In addition, CMS . . . See, e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo; 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e)(4). . . . A section of the relevant regulation, 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g)(3), specifically mentioned FICA taxes as . . . the “significant distortion” nor “extraordinary circumstances” adjustments outlined in 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . .

AT T CORP. v. UNITED STATES,, 76 Fed. Cl. 297 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . . § 413.40(a); pension costs must be allocated to segments of an organization, see § 413.40(c); actuarial . . .

In E. KRAUSE, S. v., 349 B.R. 272 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2006)

. . . 185-15399-14117 3,963.66 FGC: Vanguard 0050/09877867914 14,073.62 FGC: Terra Nova Trading 32012928 413.40 . . .

MERCY CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER, v. G. THOMPSON,, 380 F.3d 142 (3d Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 413.40(c) (2002). . . .

VENCOR, INC. d b a d b a d b a v. STANDARD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,, 317 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 413.40(a)(3)(D). Medicare, however, does not cover the full per diem rate. . . .

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, v. H. RUMSFELD,, 317 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

. . . Because CAS 413.40(a) requires a contractor to make an actuarial valuation annually, the amortization . . . Id. § 413.40(a). . . .

HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL, St. s f k a f k a v. THOMPSON,, 319 F.3d 74 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 413.40(b)(1) (1993); Tucson Medical Center [v. . . . the base year by a legislatively determined percentage. 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(b)(3) (1988); 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . half the difference between its costs and the ceiling. 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(b)(l)(A) (1988); 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . regulation defining the TEFRA base year, 42 C.F.R. § 405.463(b)(1) (1982) ( renumbered as 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . first period of at least 12 months subsequent to that short period is the base period. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . .

HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL, St. s f k a f k a v. THOMPSON,, 306 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 413.40(b)(1) (1993); Tucson Medical Center [v. . . . the base year by a legislatively determined percentage. 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(b)(3) (1988); 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . half the difference between its costs and the ceiling. 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(b)(l)(A) (1988); 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . regulation defining the TEFRA base year, 42 C.F.R. § 405.463(b)(1) (1982) (renumbered as 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . first period of at least 12 months subsequent to that short period is the base period. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . .

P. I. A. MICHIGAN CITY INCORPORATED, d b a v. G. THOMPSON,, 292 F.3d 820 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 413.40 in 1982 and subsequently amended relevant portions of those regulations. . . . HCFA granted it approval to participate in the Medicare program, for less than 2 years. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 (2001). B. Factual Background Plaintiff P.I.A. . . . , or at least a change in its TEFRA limit base year from 1984 to 1989-90 under § 413.40(b). . . . (h)(1989) (codified as revised at 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g)(2001)), provided a mechanism for adjustment to . . .

NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES UNION, DISTRICT SEIU AFL- CIO, v. G. ROWLAND,, 204 F. Supp. 2d 336 (D. Conn. 2002)

. . . . § 413.40(g). . . .

TELEDYNE, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 50 Fed. Cl. 155 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

. . . actuarial gains and losses shall be calculated annually and assigned to specific cost accounting periods, § 413.40 . . . (a), and that pension costs shall be allocated to segments of an organization, § 413.40(e). . . . Id. § 413.40. . . .

CHW WEST BAY, v. G. THOMPSON,, 246 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 413.40(e). . . . . § 413.40(e)(2), (3). . . .

HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL, St. s v. E. SHALALA, St. s v. E., 130 F. Supp. 2d 376 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . . § 413.40, which they contend interprets subsection (b)(3)(A) in a manner contrary to 42 C.F.R. § 412.71 . . . In particular, they argue that 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 interprets the language, “the first such reporting . . . (b)(3)(A) should not be accorded deference because 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(b) and two comments made by the . . . Assuming that 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(b) and the Secretary’s 1986 comments evidence an interpretation of ( . . .

P. I. A. SARASOTA PALMS, INC. a d b a v. E. SHALALA,, 125 F. Supp. 2d 1085 (M.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . . § 413.40 Under TEFRA, a target amount is set for each provider based on its allowable inpatient costs . . . for a base-period. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4). . . . by applying a rate-of-increase or update factor to the target amount of the base period. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . if the operating costs are less than the target amount, the provider receives a bonus. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . See 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(c)(4). . . .

TENET HEALTHSYSTEMS HOSPITALS, INC. NME d b a v. E. SHALALA,, 43 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . . § 413.40. (Dkt. 1, Paragraph 12). 8. . . . . § 413.40(b)(1). Using these costs, the Secretary computes a “target amount” for each hospital. . . . See generally 42 C.F.R. § 413.40. (Dkt. 1, Paragraph 14). 11. . . . Second, HCFA relied on 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g)(1), which provides that a TEFRA adjustment may only be granted . . . the base period against which such increase is measured).” 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(b)(4)(A); 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . .

In L. MELTON, A. v. L., 238 B.R. 686 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1999)

. . . Loan $ 583.94 $ 246.30 Net $1,265.20 $1,069.25 Monthly equivalent Other Income: 200.00 Tax Refund _ 413.40 . . . child support should be increased from the current figure of Four Hundred Thirteen and 40/100 Dollars ($413.40 . . .

FOOTHILL PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, v. E. SHALALA,, 152 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 413.40(e) was untimely. . . . Discussion The Hospital argues that the plain language of 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e), as it existed at the . . . The Secretary’s interpretation is not inconsistent with the language of 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e). . . . Rather, exception requests to TEFRA target rate limits are governed by 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e). . . . However, these regulations provide guidance for interpreting § 413.40(e). . . .

In L. MELTON, A. v. L., 228 B.R. 641 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1998)

. . . Income— John Melton Debra Melton (bi-weekly) (weekly) $1,430.71 $365.38 Gross 85.72 433.37 413.40 Less . . . 246.75 Net Monthly equivalent 1.265.20 1,069.25 Other income: Tax refund 200.00 Child support/alimony 413.40 . . .

SAINT VINCENT HEALTH CENTER, v. E. SHALALA, C., 937 F. Supp. 496 (W.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . . § 413.40(b)(1), (c)(2). . . . cost fall below the target amount, the provider receives some portion of this difference. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . Id. at § 1395ww(b)(4); 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e). . . . . § 413.40(e)(1). . . . Id. at § 413.40(e)(2)-(5). . . .

SSM REHABILITATION INSTITUTE, v. E. SHALALA,, 68 F.3d 266 (8th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 413.40(f)(1) (1986), formerly 42 C.F.R. § 405.463(f)(1) (1984). . . . The PRRB majority reasoned that the plain language of 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(f)(1) focused solely on the . . . Emphasizing the purpose of the new hospital exemption, and the term “has operated” in § 413.40(f)(1), . . . The Secretary’s interpretation of 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(f)(1) is both linguistically possible and consistent . . . In these circumstances, we must defer to the Secretary’s interpretation of 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(f)(1). . . .

MEMORIAL REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF SANTA BARBARA, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 65 F.3d 134 (9th Cir. 1995)

. . . Section 405.463 was subsequently renumbered and now appears without substantive change as section 413.40 . . .

RYE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL CENTER, INC. v. E. SHALALA,, 52 F.3d 1163 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 413.40(b)(1) (1993); Tucson Medical Center, 947 F.2d at 975. . . . For example, under 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g)(3)(ii)(D) (1993), an “[i]ncrease[ ] in service intensity or . . . Section 413.40(i) of the regulation, which applies to years beginning after 1990, permits the Secretary . . . It instead must send the request to HCFA for review. 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(e) (1993). . . . It may apply for an adjustment under Section 1395ww(b)(4)(A) and 42 C.F.R. §§ 413.40(g), 413.40(i) (1993 . . .

CONNECTICUT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, W. St. s St. s St. St. s II v. P. WEICKER, Jr., 46 F.3d 211 (2d Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 413.40(f)-(g). . . .

ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER, v. E. SHALALA, C., 32 F.3d 805 (3d Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 413.40(g)(2) (1990)) or if the hospital had experienced a change in its “case mix” (42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . . In addition, 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(h), which bore the heading “Adjustments,” provided in pertinent part: . . . In 1991, these provisions were combined to form what is now 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g) (1993). . . . See 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395ww(b)(4)(A)-(B) (Supp.1993); 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(i). . . . . § 413.40(g). . . .

RYE PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL CENTER, INC. v. E. SHALALA,, 846 F. Supp. 1170 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . . § 413.40(b)(1) (emphasis added). . . . This preceding 12-month period is called in the regulation the “base year;” id. at § 413.40(b)(1), despite . . . (g)(1), as well as guidelines for seeking assignment of a new base period, id. at § 413.40(h)(4)(i). . . . While the regulation states at 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(g)(1), “[the Health Care Finance Administration] may . . . Sullivan, 947 F.2d 971, 974 (D.C.Cir.1991). . 42 C.F.R. § 413.40. . . . .

EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL, v. E. SHALALA,, 994 F.2d 879 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

. . . . § 413.40 (1992). TEFRA also set out specific exceptions and adjustments to the new limits. . . . Id.; see also 42' C.F.R. § 413.40(f)-(g) (exemptions and adjustments). . . .

MERCY HOSPITAL, v. E. SHALALA,, 823 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993)

. . . . § 405.463 (redesignated as § 413.40). . . . § 413.130 [formerly § 405.-414], return on equity capital as described in § 413.157.... 42 C.F.R, § 413.40 . . .

ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D. B. D. No. W. M. D. B. D. No., 962 F.2d 1110 (3d Cir. 1992)

. . . . § 413.40(e) (emphasis added). . . . . § 413.40(h)(l)(i) (emphasis added). . . . . § 413.40(h), an adjustment to the base year costs that establish its cost per case and TEFRA increase . . . . § 413.40(h) (1988). . . . The Medical Center then filed a request for a base year adjustment, pursuant to 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(h) . . . exception” to its 1986 TEFRA target amount, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1395ww(b)(4)(A) and 42 C.F.R. § 413.40 . . .

SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER v. W. SULLIVAN, M. D. W. M. D., 958 F.2d 537 (3d Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 413.40(g)(2) and (h). . . .

In BICOASTAL CORPORATION, d b a f k a, 124 B.R. 593 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1991)

. . . Section 413.40 of CAS provides that a contractor is required to calculate actual gains and losses on . . .

Co. v., 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 198 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . See, e.g., Headnotes to items 412.76 through 413.40, TSUS ("Aromatic or odoriferous compounds * * *”) . . .

STANDARD CHLORINE CHEMICAL CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 725 F. Supp. 539 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . See, e.g., Headnotes to items 412.76 through 413.40, TSUS (“Aromatic or odoriferous compounds ... ”). . . .

MT. DIABLO HOSPITAL DISTRICT, v. R. BOWEN, ST. JOHN S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER, v. R. BOWEN,, 860 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1988)

. . . . § 413.40(a)(1) (implementing regulations). . . . . § 413.40(d). The incentive payments are known as “TEFRA bonuses.” . . . The TEFRA regulations, 42 C.F.R. § 413.40, state that TEFRA bonuses and penalties should be “determined . . . They refer to both TEFRA bonuses and TEFRA penalties as “reimbursement.” 42 C.F.R. § 413.40(d)(1), (iii . . . Id. § 413.40(d)(l)(i), (iii), (iv). . . .

In MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF IOWA COUNTY, INC., 82 B.R. 478 (W.D. Wis. 1988)

. . . allowable in-patient operating costs incurred in the year immediately preceding the payment. 42 C.R.F. 413.40 . . .

NEW YORK PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, INC. v. LIMCO MANUFACTURING CORPORATION,, 697 F. Supp. 608 (E.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . .-01(a) and 413.40 (1986). (Complaint at ¶ 16). . . .

In MOLAI SHIPPING CORPORATION, M V GEORGIOS G, CAPPELLINI, M. v. BRADFORD SHIPPING CORP. Co., 569 F. Supp. 523 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . For the period from July 1 to August 5, 1980, he earned gross wages of $413.40. . . .

HAROLD H. GEARINGER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROYAL BARRY SHAW v. THE UNITED STATES, 188 Ct. Cl. 512 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . month- $9,333.41 5-1-52 through 3-31-55 at $363.10 per month- 12, 708.50 4r-l-55 through 5-31-58 at $413.40 . . .