Cases from cite.case.law:

SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS HOSPICE, INC. v. BURWELL,, 815 F.3d 448 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . terminally ill, or becomes so disruptive as to interfere with SEARK’s ability to provide care. 42 C.F.R § 418.26 . . .

SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS HOSPICE, INC. v. SEBELIUS,, 1 F. Supp. 3d 915 (E.D. Ark. 2014)

. . . The PRRB concluded that it lacks jurisdiction over the challenge to the validity of 42 C.F.R. § 418.26 . . . SEARK has clarified that it also seeks to enjoin application of 42 C.F.R. § 418.26, which it believes . . . Flowers explained he interprets 42 C.F.R. § 418.26 to forbid discharging a patient simply because the . . . Flowers attributes several financial troubles to SEARK’s compliance with § 418.26 and the hospice cap . . . Flowers acknowledged that 42 C.F.R. § 418.26 permits a hospice to discharge a patient whose physical . . .

In AGENT ORANGE PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. F. RYAN, v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, J. SCHLEGEL, v. J. DEAN,, 611 F. Supp. 1452 (E.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . AGREEMENT GAIN OR LOSS COURT AWARDED RATE NET HOURLY RATE BROWN 296.493.75 551.157.19 + 254,663.44 225.00 418.26 . . .