Florida Statute 440.01 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR

Chapter 440
WORKERS' COMPENSATION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 440.01

440.01 Short title.—This chapter may be cited as the “Workers’ Compensation Law.”

History.—s. 1, ch. 17481, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 5966(1); s. 23, ch. 78-300; ss. 1, 124, ch. 79-40; s. 21, ch. 79-312; s. 43, ch. 89-289; s. 56, ch. 90-201; s. 52, ch. 91-1.

F.S. 440.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 440.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 440.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 440.01

Total Results: 86

Jones v. Florida Power Corp.

72 So. 2d 285, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1403

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 1954 | Docket: 456566

Cited 59 times | Published

Compensation Act of the State of Florida, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., "since none of the defendants are (sic)

Arkin Construction Company v. Simpkins

99 So. 2d 557

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1957 | Docket: 1568288

Cited 51 times | Published

failure. The Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., does not make industry the insurer of

Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal Farms

74 So. 2d 282, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1116

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1954 | Docket: 1689948

Cited 32 times | Published

benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., against the Naranja Rock Company, herein

City of Boca Raton v. Mattef

91 So. 2d 644

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1956 | Docket: 1332070

Cited 28 times | Published

applicability of our Workmen's Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., therefore, we offer no comment on it

N. & L. Auto Parts Company v. Doman

111 So. 2d 270

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1959 | Docket: 1428196

Cited 27 times | Published

injury would be compensable under the Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. This assumes, of course, that claimant

Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. Bedingfield

60 So. 2d 489, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1394

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1952 | Docket: 1507100

Cited 25 times | Published

the time the employee sustains an injury. See Section 440.01, et seq., F.S.A.; Chamberlain v. Florida Power

Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. Bedingfield

60 So. 2d 489, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1394

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1952 | Docket: 1507100

Cited 25 times | Published

the time the employee sustains an injury. See Section 440.01, et seq., F.S.A.; Chamberlain v. Florida Power

Superior Mill Work v. Gabel

89 So. 2d 794

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 1956 | Docket: 1257271

Cited 22 times | Published

to our Workmen's Compensation *796 Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. and, in doubtful cases, resolved such

Stuyvesant Corp. v. Waterhouse

74 So. 2d 554, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1133

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1954 | Docket: 1689949

Cited 22 times | Published

under the Workmen's Compensation Laws, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The claimant, Fred Waterhouse, was employed

Crawford v. Benrus Market

40 So. 2d 889, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1430

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 20, 1949 | Docket: 3261090

Cited 17 times | Published

compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The usual hearing was conducted and on

Andrews v. CBS DIVISION, ETC.

118 So. 2d 206

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1960 | Docket: 1515434

Cited 16 times | Published

appealed to the workmen's compensation act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. for relief on account of the injury had

Sanford v. AP Clark Motors

45 So. 2d 185, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 1338

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1950 | Docket: 1282820

Cited 16 times | Published

Compensation and other benefits as provided under Section 440.01 et seq., F.S.A. Appellees resist her claim

Winn-Lovett Tampa v. Murphree

73 So. 2d 287, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1527

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1954 | Docket: 322271

Cited 15 times | Published

or not the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., provides the exclusive remedy for the

Clark v. Choctawhatchee Electric Co-Operative

107 So. 2d 609

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1958 | Docket: 1335978

Cited 14 times | Published

claimants under the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., the language of the court on the subject

Leon County School Bd. v. Grimes

548 So. 2d 205, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 366, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 722, 1989 WL 83145

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1989 | Docket: 1333292

Cited 13 times | Published

meet the statutory definition of injury in section 440.01(14) requiring it to be caused `by accident

Davidow v. Seyfarth

58 So. 2d 865, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1214

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1952 | Docket: 1453938

Cited 13 times | Published

the Florida Workman's Compensation Law [F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq.] * * *"; so the gross negligence feature

Gray v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co.

64 So. 2d 650

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1953 | Docket: 1457825

Cited 12 times | Published

interpret the Workmen's Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., as requiring that an injury "by accident"

EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. v. Owens

78 So. 2d 104

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1955 | Docket: 1734683

Cited 11 times | Published

the Florida Workmen's Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., with the exceptions of domestics as noted

Moorer v. Putnam Lumber Co.

12 So. 2d 370, 152 Fla. 520, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 959

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1943 | Docket: 3269164

Cited 11 times | Published

controversy. Florida's Workmen's Compensation Act (Section 440.01-440.57, *Page 526 Fla. Stats. 1941) fails

Yovan v. Burdine's

81 So. 2d 555

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1955 | Docket: 1683933

Cited 10 times | Published

Workmen's Compensation Law of Florida, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. On consideration said motion for summary

Brantley v. ADH Building Contractors, Inc.

215 So. 2d 297

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1968 | Docket: 1312413

Cited 9 times | Published

money allowance payable to an employee. Fla. Stat. § 440.01(11) (1965), F.S.A. Provision for medical services

Dennis v. Brown

93 So. 2d 584

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1957 | Docket: 1752171

Cited 9 times | Published

recoverable under the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. Medical treatment was continued to be

School Bd. of Broward County v. Victorin

767 So. 2d 551, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10734, 2000 WL 1188352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2000 | Docket: 2548016

Cited 8 times | Published

arising out of and in the course of employment. § 440.01 et seq., Fla. Stat. Section 440.11(1) provides

Chesser v. General Dredging Co.

150 F. Supp. 592, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3749

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1957 | Docket: 1032360

Cited 8 times | Published

Compensation Law of the State of Florida, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. *595 The total amount of such compensation

Blount v. State Road Dept.

87 So. 2d 507

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1956 | Docket: 1761474

Cited 8 times | Published

provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. This is commonly referred to in the books

Faulk v. Parrish

58 So. 2d 523, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1174

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1952 | Docket: 1733399

Cited 8 times | Published

authorized by the Workmen's Compensation Act. F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. It is the result of a most unfortunate

Hillsboro Plantation v. Plunkett

55 So. 2d 534, 1951 Fla. LEXIS 930

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1951 | Docket: 419091

Cited 8 times | Published

*535 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. Trial was had before a jury, and a verdict

Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company

138 So. 2d 308

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1962 | Docket: 1404086

Cited 7 times | Published

Workmen's Compensation Act. Florida Statutes, Section 440.01 et seq., F.S.A. At the time of the alleged

Daoud v. Matz

73 So. 2d 51, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1493

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 1954 | Docket: 1796172

Cited 7 times | Published

under the Workmen's Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., regarding the extent to which payments

Feraci v. Grundy Marine Construction Co.

315 F. Supp. 2d 1197, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5681, 2004 WL 895889

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 2004 | Docket: 2249253

Cited 6 times | Published

So.2d 686, 687 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2003); Fla. Stat. § 440.1(1)(b)). In the case at hand, Grundy was the general

Keys Engineering Co. v. Boston Insurance Co.

192 F. Supp. 574, 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3127

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1961 | Docket: 1595084

Cited 6 times | Published

the Florida Workmen's Compensation Act. F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. 16. On November 8, 1955, a letter [American

Standard Oil Company v. Gay

118 So. 2d 212

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1960 | Docket: 467645

Cited 5 times | Published

appealed to the Workmen's Compensation Act (F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq.) for relief had there been no disease

Boden v. City of Hialeah

132 So. 2d 160

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 1961 | Docket: 1382142

Cited 4 times | Published

arise under the Workmen's Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. from a single accident for which compensation

Perkins v. Richards Constructors, Inc.

111 So. 2d 494

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1959 | Docket: 1427884

Cited 4 times | Published

benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. It appears from the record that on August

McNeill v. Thompson

53 So. 2d 868, 1951 Fla. LEXIS 1621

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1951 | Docket: 1753223

Cited 4 times | Published

within the meaning of the Compensation Act. F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. By agreement, the case was tried upon

City of Plantation v. Roberts

342 So. 2d 69

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1976 | Docket: 421532

Cited 3 times | Published

afforded by the Workmen's Compensation Law. Section 440.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (1975). The holding

Ortkiese v. Clarson & Ewell Engineering

126 So. 2d 556

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1961 | Docket: 1314698

Cited 3 times | Published

accords the workmen's compensation act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., the beneficent purpose the legislature

Jacksonville Coach Company v. Love

101 So. 2d 361

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1957 | Docket: 1326977

Cited 3 times | Published

protected by the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. Povia Bros. Farms v. Velez, Fla. 1954

Griffin, Inc. v. Loomis, Fargo & Co.

979 So. 2d 416, 2008 WL 1808496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2008 | Docket: 1714231

Cited 2 times | Published

under Florida's Workers' Compensation Law. See § 440.01. Griffin views Wells Fargowhich, through merger

Keith v. News & Sun Sentinel

631 So. 2d 333, 1994 WL 24099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1994 | Docket: 1748517

Cited 2 times | Published

purposes of the Workers' Compensation Law, Section 440.01 et seq., Florida Statutes (1993). In keeping

Paul Spellman, Inc. v. Spellman

103 So. 2d 661, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1958 | Docket: 60190315

Cited 2 times | Published

the Florida Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. On February 27, 1957, Donald S. Spell-man

Moses v. RH Wright & Son, Inc.

90 So. 2d 330

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1956 | Docket: 1230933

Cited 2 times | Published

contained in our Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. We emphasize that there is no justification

Watson v. City of New Smyrna Beach

85 So. 2d 548

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1956 | Docket: 78182

Cited 2 times | Published

employees under the Workmen's Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., and owned jointly their tools and equipment

Crum Services v. Lopez

975 So. 2d 1184, 2008 WL 595921

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2008 | Docket: 1726923

Cited 1 times | Published

the contractor in this relationship. Because section 440(1)(b) requires a contractor-subcontractor relationship

Perez v. La Dove, Inc.

964 So. 2d 777, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14247, 2007 WL 2609381

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2007 | Docket: 450983

Cited 1 times | Published

required compensation for his employees. However, section 440.01 also contains several well understood, express

Grimes v. Leon County School Bd.

518 So. 2d 327, 1987 WL 2665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1987 | Docket: 1777745

Cited 1 times | Published

meet the statutory definition of injury in section 440.01(14) requiring it to be caused "by accident

State v. Mobley

133 So. 2d 334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1961 | Docket: 60198490

Cited 1 times | Published

implemented the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S. A. § 440.01 et seq. The Supreme Court of the United States

Adams v. Florida Industrial Commission

110 So. 2d 455, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 3167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1959 | Docket: 60192129

Cited 1 times | Published

petitioner-claimant under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. for an injury she received in the course

Jacksonville Journal Co. v. Gilreath ex rel. Nalle

104 So. 2d 865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1958 | Docket: 60190734

Cited 1 times | Published

applicability of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. to the situation here presented has been

Sun Insurance Co. v. Boyd

101 So. 2d 419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1958 | Docket: 60189640

Cited 1 times | Published

claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. is based on this injury. The insurance

Ouzts v. A. P. Ward & Son, Inc.

146 F. Supp. 733, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2498

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1956 | Docket: 66006381

Cited 1 times | Published

the Florida Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The evidence touching the question of

Patton Seafood Co. v. Glisson

38 So. 2d 839, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1260

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1949 | Docket: 3259671

Cited 1 times | Published

compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law. F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The primary test of the relationship of

Patton Seafood Co. v. Glisson

38 So. 2d 839, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1260

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1949 | Docket: 3259671

Cited 1 times | Published

compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law. F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The primary test of the relationship of

Maxum Indem. Co. v. 3rd Generation Plumbing, Inc.

342 F. Supp. 3d 1292

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2018 | Docket: 64321322

Published

wrongful death case exists purely due to operation of § 440(1)(b)(2) of the Florida Workers Compensation Law

R.L. Haines Construction, LLC v. Santamaria

161 So. 3d 528, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14605, 2014 WL 4648522

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 19, 2014 | Docket: 60247194

Published

was "virtually certain” within the meaning of section 440.1 l(l)(b)2., we do not discuss R.L. Haines's contentions

Lovering v. Nickerson

72 So. 3d 780, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13419, 2011 WL 3754660

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2011 | Docket: 60303304

Published

was a statutory employee “as defined in Florida Statute 440.01(15)(e)” at the time of his injury and,

Rush v. BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

773 F. Supp. 2d 1261, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15831, 2011 WL 691617

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2011 | Docket: 2341294

Published

2004). Florida's Workers' Compensation Law, Fla. Stat. 440.01, et seq., "`protects workers and compensates

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 3256265

Published

Charlie Crist Attorney General CC/tjw 1 See Section 440.01, Fla. Stat., providing the short title for

Haynes v. World Color Press

794 So. 2d 674, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399, 2001 WL 910101

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2001 | Docket: 64808445

Published

meet the statutory definition of injury in section 440.01(14) [renumbered section 440.02(17), Florida

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

795 So. 2d 863, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 866, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2275, 2000 WL 1508551

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2000 | Docket: 64808988

Published

as presented-to-the — E AO-created — under section--440:1-9-1--Florida — Statutesr-in—a for Assistance

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 8, 1992 | Docket: 3257734

Published

officer or one which is done deliberately.11 1 Section 440.01, F.S. 2 Section 440.091, F.S., provides that

Dobbins v. Weber

585 So. 2d 1143, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9150, 1991 WL 181515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1991 | Docket: 64661605

Published

believe, however,' that the plain language of section 440.01 [sic] and *1145440.11(1) precludes any further

State v. Vogel

415 So. 2d 821, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1982 | Docket: 64590706

Published

rules. See generally 3 Fla.Jur.2d Appellate Review § 440.1 It is absolutely essential to the speedy and proper

Stevens v. International Builders of Florida, Inc.

207 So. 2d 287, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5896

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1968 | Docket: 64504101

Published

under the Florida Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 440.01 et seq., Fla.Stat., F.S.A., to carry workmen’s

Thomas v. Carter Fruit & Produce Co.

137 So. 2d 573

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1962 | Docket: 60201204

Published

used in our Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. In the instant case the deputy found,

Slack v. Acousti Engineering Co. of Florida

122 So. 2d 574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1960 | Docket: 60195467

Published

the Florida Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. *575The defendant filed a motion for summary

Leeds v. City of Miami

122 So. 2d 474, 1960 Fla. LEXIS 2282

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1960 | Docket: 60195454

Published

*475Workmen’s Compensation Act of Florida [F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq.], alleging essentially that he received

Gray v. Hull

114 So. 2d 176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1959 | Docket: 60193125

Published

benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The facts are identical and the petitions

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hudson

112 So. 2d 29, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1959 | Docket: 60192545

Published

used in our Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. In the instant case the *32deputy found

Hodges v. State Road Department

112 So. 2d 593, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2953

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1959 | Docket: 60192615

Published

administering the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. Specifically : (1)It ignores the fact

Rainsford v. McArthur Dairies

108 So. 2d 914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1959 | Docket: 60191766

Published

provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The deputy commissioner found that the

Tucker Taxi, Inc. v. Schofield

107 So. 2d 188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1958 | Docket: 60191339

Published

carrier under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., the petitioners, bring this proceeding

Blackman & Huckaby Enterprises v. Jones

104 So. 2d 667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1958 | Docket: 60190666

Published

compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The first order in question reversed an

Anderson v. City of Miami

101 So. 2d 612, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2725

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1958 | Docket: 60189696

Published

made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law [F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq.]” (emphasis supplied). Upon this discrepancy

Caranci v. Miami Glass & Engineering Co.

99 So. 2d 252

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1957 | Docket: 64489903

Published

benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The carrier paid the claimant compensation

University of Miami, Inc. v. Matthews

97 So. 2d 111

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1957 | Docket: 64489451

Published

under the Workmen’s Compensation. Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The Deputy Commissioner found for the

Paul Smith Construction Co. v. Florida Industrial Commission

93 So. 2d 735, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3363

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1957 | Docket: 64488901

Published

provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S. A. § 440.01 et seq. With an admirable degree of frankness

Fischer v. John W. Thomson & Son, Inc.

92 So. 2d 526

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 6, 1957 | Docket: 64488760

Published

requirements of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The full Commission affirmed the order

Lyng v. Rao

87 So. 2d 108, 1956 Fla. LEXIS 3716

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1956 | Docket: 64488006

Published

benefits of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. (See Lyng v. Rao, Fla., 72 So.2d 53.)

Zeller v. Industrial Research, Inc.

77 So. 2d 616

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1955 | Docket: 64486308

Published

under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F. S.A. § 440.01 et seq. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the

Holmes v. Carroll

75 So. 2d 203, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1784

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1954 | Docket: 64486003

Published

recovery by the Workmen’s Compensation Law, -F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq.; that they, having received money from

Amsler v. Sox Meat Packers, Inc.

75 So. 2d 207, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1786

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 1954 | Docket: 64486005

Published

definition of our Workmen’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. His father was appointed administrator

Continental Cas. Co. v. Buchan

72 So. 2d 269, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1395

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1954 | Docket: 64485481

Published

arises under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq. The employee in the course of his employment

Superior Home Builders v. Moss

70 So. 2d 570, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1284

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1954 | Docket: 64485126

Published

the Work-' *571men’s Compensation Act, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., and the employer and .the compensation

Smith v. Packer Displays, Inc.

67 So. 2d 323, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1651

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1953 | Docket: 64484749

Published

covered by the Workmen’s Compensation Law [F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq.], as an injury ‘by accident,’ and a literal

Glass v. G. A. Miller Co.

65 So. 2d 749, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1333

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1953 | Docket: 64484440

Published

meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, F.S.A. § 440.01 et seq., as construed by the cases of LeViness