Cases from cite.case.law:

ROIG, v. MOSQUERA, D. M. D., 138 So. 3d 568 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (2008), provides: In case of default by the employer or carrier in . . .

STAHL, v. HIALEAH HOSPITAL CMS,, 100 So. 3d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . petitions due to Claimant’s failure to comply with the June 22, 2011, order, citing as authority section 440.24 . . . outstanding costs order, and dismissed the pending petitions, without prejudice, pursuant to section 440.24 . . . ANALYSIS Section 440.24(4) provides in relevant part: “In any case wherein the employee fails to comply . . . 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (reversing dismissal without prejudice, holding “a JCC who implements section 440.24 . . . finding, the JCC abused his discretion in dismissing Claimant’s petitions on the authority of section 440.24 . . .

JONES, v. ROYALTY FOODS, INC., 82 So. 3d 1162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . was not “willfully” refusing to comply with the order, the JCC exercised his discretion under section 440.24 . . . Analysis Section 440.24(4) provides in relevant part: “In any case wherein the employee fails to comply . . . We find no reason not to apply the same rule to dismissals pursuant to section 440.24(4). . . . Accordingly, we hold that a JCC who implements section 440.24(4), must specifically find that the offending . . . Claimant and amici curiae also argue that, to the extent section 440.24(4), Florida Statutes (2007), . . .

HERNANDEZ, v. PALMETTO GENERAL HOSPITAL,, 60 So. 3d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . After the mandate issued, the E/C moved to dismiss the new PFBs pursuant to section 440.24(4) because . . . The dismissal order was also based on section 440.24(4) and Claimant’s failure to pay the cost order. . . . it is necessary to consider whether the JCC properly dismissed the PFBs with prejudice under section 440.24 . . . Assuming (without deciding) that section 440.24(4) authorizes the dismissal of a subsequent proceeding . . . By its terms, section 440.24(4) only authorizes claims to be dismissed “until the employee complies with . . .

PUNSKY, v. CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 60 So. 3d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Claimant also argues that section 440.24(4) supports his assertion that costs may not be awarded against . . . Section 440.24(4), which bears the title “Enforcement of Compensation Orders; Penalties,” states .that . . . In contrast, section 440.24(4) addresses enforcement and sanctions, and, contrary to claimant’s argument . . . Section 440.24(4) simply has no bearing on this case. C. . . . Based on the foregoing, we reject claimant’s first point on appeal, that sections 440.19(6) and 440.24 . . .

LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. M. WEECH,, 54 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . to an E/C in addressing whether an E/C had a right to file a rule nisi petition, pursuant to section 440.24 . . .

DEESE, v. CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 43 So. 3d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . sought to enforce the order by filing a petition for rule nisi in the circuit court pursuant to section 440.24 . . .

G. BROWN, v. CLAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 43 So. 3d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . review of the trial court’s order granting Appellees’ rule nisi petition filed pursuant to section 440.24 . . . The E/C in New argued that, although section 440.24(1) specifically provides that an employee may seek . . . The E/C in New further argued that the section 440.24(1) is unconstitutional as applied because it does . . . The court rejected this argument, explaining that section 440.24(1) does not purport to establish the . . . Appellees did not make this constitutional argument in this case, but they did argue that section 440.24 . . .

ORANGE COUNTY AND ALTERNATIVE SERVICE, v. NEW,, 39 So. 3d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Appellee challenged the trial court’s jurisdiction to issue a rule nisi against him under section 440.24 . . . Section 440.24(1) establishes an expedited procedure to enforce a compensation award. . . . They explain that, when section 440.24(1) was first enacted, only employees could recover costs, so it . . . Specifically, they urge that we should infer a reciprocal remedy by reading section 440.24(1) in pari . . . Section 440.24(1) establishes an expedited enforcement remedy in the circuit court. . . .

A. SMITH, v. AMS STAFF LEASING, 29 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Smith subsequently filed a petition for rule nisi in the circuit court pursuant to section 440.24, Florida . . . Section 440.24(1) states: In case of default by the employer or carrier in the payment of compensation . . . taxed and awarded to the claimant if he “successfully prevails in proceedings filed under [section] 440.24 . . .

M. KING, v. PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION, 17 So. 3d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The court determined that it did not have jurisdiction under section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (2007 . . . Section 440.24(1) provides that a circuit court has jurisdiction to issue a rule nisi directing the employer . . . Instead, section 440.24(1) gives the circuit court the authority to issue a rule nisi to enforce such . . . order at issue was nonfinal and the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to enforce it under section 440.24 . . . attorney's fees “[i]n cases where the claimant successfully prevails in proceedings filed under s. 440.24 . . .

CHANDLER, v. CENTEX ROONEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 15 So. 3d 837 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . the e/c denies that a compensable accident occurred, or prevails in proceedings filed under sections 440.24 . . .

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD v. BENOIT, BENOIT,, 1 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (2007), provides the circuit court with jurisdiction to issue a writ . . . See §§ 440.24, 440.28, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (2007) specifically provides: In case of default by the employer . . .

MURRAY, v. MARINER HEALTH ACE USA,, 994 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 2008)

. . . compensability; or (d) In cases where the claimant successfully prevails in proceedings filed under s. 440.24 . . .

In YATKO A. v., 416 B.R. 193 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2008)

. . . (l-440.12), (b) a summons (1-440.23), and (c) a notice of levy (1-440.24). N.C. Gen.Stat. 1-440.25. . . . Gen.Stat. 1-440.24. . . .

U. S. FOUNDRY MANUFACTURING, INC. a k a U. S. v. CARNER,, 959 So. 2d 378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 440.24(1), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

W. MABIRE, v. ST. PAUL GUARDIAN INSURANCE CO. a k a St. f k a USF G,, 946 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . brings this appeal from the circuit court’s dismissal of his petition for rule nisi, pursuant to section 440.24 . . . the Worker’s Compensation Law which governs enforcement of a JCC’s-final compensation order, section 440.24 . . . directing such employer or carrier to show cause why a writ of execution ... shall not be issued. § 440.24 . . . compensation order since the sole remedy for enforcement is by the procedure outlined in subsection 440.24 . . .

BOWE, v. MCDONALD S, 933 So. 2d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Abbreviated final orders under section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes, shall be enforceable under section 440.24 . . .

TRANSPORTATION CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. J. FELDMAN, 927 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . However, when section 440.34(1) is read in connection with section 440.24(1), it allows circuit court . . .

MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, v. FONKEN,, 886 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 440.24(1), Fla. Stat. (1998); North Shore Med. Ctr. v. . . .

DE LA PENA, v. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY, 870 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . . § 440.24(1), Fla. Stat. (1998); North Shore Med. Ctr. v. . . .

BUSSEY, v. WAL- MART STORE, 867 So. 2d 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . dispute in this case centers around whether the 120-day ‘pay-and-investigate’ rule as set forth in § 440.24 . . .

GRUBER, v. CAREMARK, INC., 853 So. 2d 540 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . unpaid, Gruber filed a rule nisi petition against Caremark in the circuit court pursuant to section 440.24 . . .

LEVINE, BUSCH, SCHNEPPER STEIN, P. A. v. POOL PILING ENTERPRISES,, 847 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . remand, the judge of compensation claims may be able to induce satisfaction of the lien under section 440.24 . . . the employee’s] claim [on the merits] until the employee complies with [the attorney’s fee] order.” § 440.24 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 829 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Abbreviated final orders under section 440.25(4)(d), Florida Statutes, shall be enforceable under séction 440.24 . . . failure to perform under a mediation agreement, enforcement shall proceed in accordance with section 440.24 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 795 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 2000)

. . . failure to perform under a mediation agreement, enforcement shall proceed in accordance with section 440.24 . . .

TUCKER, v. JOHN GALT INSURANCE AGENCY CORPORATION, f k a, 743 So. 2d 108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section, 440.24, Florida Statutes (1997), provides the circuit court with jurisdiction to enforce orders . . .

SARAKOFF, v. BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, 736 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 440.24, Florida Statutes, provides for the enforcement of compensation orders. . . . . § 440.24, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . . of the set-off, the claimant filed a petition for rule nisi in the circuit court pursuant to section 440.24 . . .

TORRES, v. ADAMS d b a, 710 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . We reverse and remand for further proceedings pursuant to section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (1995). . . . Torres appealed the trial court’s dismissal, pursuant to section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes. . . . contends that the circuit court had jurisdiction to hear his petition for rule nisi pursuant to section 440.24 . . . order as may be necessary to enforce the terms of such order of the judge of compensation claims. § 440.24 . . . we reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings pursuant to Betancourt and section 440.24 . . .

STAFFING CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PAUL,, 704 So. 2d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Paul or provide continuing medical care, Paul filed her petition for rule nisi pursuant to section 440.24 . . . See § 440.24(1), Fla. . . .

MERRITT, v. PROMO GRAPHICS, INC., 691 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Merritt filed a petition for Rule nisi pursuant to section 440.24, Florida Statutes (1995), claiming . . . Section 440.24 provides, in part, that: In ease of default by the employer or carrier in the payment . . . Merritt filed a petition for rule nisi in the circuit court pursuant to section 440.24, Florida Statutes . . . Section 440.24 provides, in part: In case of default by the employer or carrier in the payment of compensation . . .

SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE, INC. a k a v. CORDELL,, 693 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . On February 7, 1996, Claimant applied for the issuance of a Rule Nisi pursuant to § 440.24 for enforcement . . .

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY v. ROLLE,, 680 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Self-Insured Fund appeal a final order granting claimant/appel-lee’s rule nisi petition under subsection 440.24 . . . The claimant filed an application in circuit court for issuance of a rule nisi under subsection 440.24 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 674 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1996)

. . . consist of, or include, directives of a nonmone-tary nature, or a penalty pursuant to section 440.20 or 440.24 . . . failure to perform under a mediation agreement, enforcement shall proceed in accordance with section 440.24 . . .

FRANK, v. CRAWFORD COMPANY,, 670 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (1993), provides that the circuit courts shah have jurisdiction to . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 664 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1995)

. . . As in all other cases, enforcement in ease of default is governed by section 440.24, Florida Statutes . . .

NAVARRO, v. SUGARCANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL ADMINISTRATORS, INC., 661 So. 2d 946 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . . § 440.24(1), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY v. ROLLE,, 661 So. 2d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . sought enforcement of the order in a rule nisi proceeding in the circuit court pursuant to subsection 440.24 . . . The circuit court has no jurisdiction in a rule nisi proceeding under subsection 440.24(1) to modify . . . by the Industrial Relations Judge, the Order is required to be enforced by the Circuit Judge under 440.24 . . . compensation order since the sole remedy for enforcement is by the procedure outlined in subsection 440.24 . . . Once jurisdiction is properly invoked in the circuit court, nothing in the clear terms of subsection 440.24 . . .

BUENA VISTA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. CAPPS,, 656 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . prior compensation order, since the sole remedy for enforcement is by the procedure outlined in section 440.24 . . .

HUMANA OF FLORIDA. INC. d b a s L. M. D. L. M. D. P. A. v. McKAUGHAN McKAUGHAN, a FLORIDA BIRTH- RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, v. McKAUGHAN McKAUGHAN, a SOLOMON, M. D. M. D. P. A. v. McKAUGHAN McKAUGHAN, a, 652 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Compare § 766.312 with §§ 440.24(1); 440.33(2), Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER v. S. CAPUA,, 634 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . It is therefore clear that the circuit court had no jurisdiction under Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes . . .

BROOKS, v. MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, 634 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . In October 1990, claimant filed a petition for a rule nisi in circuit court, pursuant to section 440.24 . . .

THOMPSON, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 618 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . with DHRS that an award of interest is not recoverable in a rule nisi proceeding pursuant to section 440.24 . . . COBB and HARRIS, JJ., concur. . § 440.24, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . .

BENEDICT, f k a v. EXECUTIVE RISK CONSULTANTS, INC. a k a E. R. C. a, 616 So. 2d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . role of the circuit court, when considering a petition for issuance of a rule nisi pursuant to section 440.24 . . .

ALPHA RESINS CORP. Co. v. TOWNSEND,, 606 So. 2d 506 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . On March 7, 1991, claimant filed a Petition for Rule Nisi with the circuit court pursuant to Section 440.24 . . .

MARANJE, v. BRINKS OF FLORIDA, INC., 610 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The authority of a circuit court judge in a Rule Nisi proceeding under section 440.24(1) is limited to . . . writ of execution or such other process or final order as may be necessary to enforce” the order. § 440.24 . . . As authority for its argument, employer/carrier cites to section 440.24(1) and Workers’ Compensation . . . workers’ compensation orders, a claimant must resort to the enforcement provisions contained in section 440.24 . . . Section 440.24(1) provides: In case of default by the employer or carrier in the payment of compensation . . .

MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, v. MILHOLIN,, 608 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 440.24(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Grant-Sholk Constr. Co., Inc. v. . . .

AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEDURE, 603 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 1992)

. . . shall constitute a waiver by the parties of the requirements of Ssection 440.2d(3)(a), and Section 440.24 . . . As in all other cases, enforcement in case of default is governed by section 440.24, Florida Statutes . . . failure to perform under a mediation agreement, enforcement shall proceed in accordance with section 440.24 . . .

J. A. B. ENTERPRISES v. L. GIBBONS, Sr., 596 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . On June 7, 1990, Gibbons, pursuant to section 440.24(1) of the Florida Statutes (1989), filed an amended . . .

ALVAREZ, v. KENDALL ASSOCIATES, 590 So. 2d 518 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . The enforcement provisions governing workers compensation orders are contained in Section 440.24, Florida . . . Section 440.24 provides that the circuit courts have the power to enforce the compensation orders of . . . the deputy commissioners and states specifically: 440.24 Enforcement of compensation orders; penalties . . .

LIDHOLM, v. AETNA LIFE CASUALTY, a, 569 So. 2d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that in case of the failure of a carrier to comply . . . The claimant in this case filed a petition under section 440.24(1) for the issuance of a rule nisi, alleging . . . Under section 440.24(1) the only issue to be determined by a circuit court upon application for rule . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR. In Re WORKERS COMPENSATION RULES OF PROCEDURE, 535 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1988)

. . . .-24(3)(a), and Section 440.24(3)(b), Florida Statutes, as to the timeliness of hearings and the entry . . .

T. CONNOLLY V. v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY,, 849 F.2d 525 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 440.13, 440.20, 440.24 (1969) (other provisions providing for penalties under 1969 Act). . . .

N. PIERCE, v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, a, 519 So. 2d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Thereupon, appellant unsuccessfully sought a rule nisi in the circuit court pursuant to section 440.24 . . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes, provides: (1) In case of default by the employer or carrier in the . . . Commission, the order remains in full force and effect and can be enforced by a chancellor pursuant to § 440.24 . . .

MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. KRIEGEL,, 522 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Pursuant to Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes, Kriegel then filed a petition for rule nisi to enforce . . . the claimant that generally a circuit court has no authority in a rule nisi proceeding under section 440.24 . . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes, provides: In the case of default by the employer or carrier in the . . .

CITY OF MIAMI, v. KNIGHT,, 510 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Sometime in early 1986, Knight sought a rule nisi from the circuit court pursuant to Section 440.24(1 . . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (1985) provides that In case of default by the employer or carrier . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, v. WILCOX,, 504 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . Troy, 448 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); § 440.24, Fla.Stat. (1985). Contra Colonel’s Table v. . . .

TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO. v. SITKO, 496 So. 2d 920 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Thus it is expressly governed by section 440.24. . . .

FRED TEITELBAUM CONSTRUCTION, INC. U. S. v. MORRIS,, 489 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes. . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, v. WILCOX,, 478 So. 2d 850 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . In a “rule nisi” proceeding under section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (1983), the court below enforced . . . consider that the entire order, specifically including the fee portion, is not yet “final” under section 440.24 . . . the orders under review are reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the section 440.24 . . . the amenability of a state agency like the appellant to the remedy of execution provided by a section 440.24 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE WORKERS COMPENSATION RULES OF PROCEDURE, 460 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1984)

. . . As in all other cases, enforcement in case of default is governed by section 440.24, Florida Statutes . . .

TROY DESK MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. TROY,, 448 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . We affirm the order granting the claimant-appellee’s rule nisi application under Section 440.24(1), Florida . . .

VENNE, v. KLEUVER, 435 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . The trial judge denied the claimant-appellant’s rule nisi application under Section 440.24(1), Fla.Stat . . .

FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, v. GUSTINGER, Jr., 390 So. 2d 420 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . The rule nisi action authorized by Section 440.24(1), Florida Statutes (1977) was specifically designed . . .

J. BOOTH, v. BASIC ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION CO., 369 So. 2d 356 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . by the Industrial Relations Judge, the Order is required to be enforced by the Circuit Judge under § 440.24 . . .

ART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. JACKSON,, 362 So. 2d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . compensation insurer appeal the allowance of an attorney’s fee upon employee’s petition pursuant to Section 440.24 . . .

BELFORD TRUCKING COMPANY, v. PINSON,, 360 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . on appeal from the order of the Circuit Court, Marion County, entered pursuant to Florida Statute § 440.24 . . .

STEED, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,, 355 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . of the trial judge dismissing with prejudice appellant’s petition for rule nisi pursuant to Section 440.24 . . . Section 440.24(1) provides that, in case of default by an employer or carrier in the payment of compensation . . .

POTTER, v. HOWARD HALL COMPANY, INC., 355 So. 2d 491 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . Merritt, 160 So.2d 552 (Fla.2d DCA 1964), and Section 440.24, Florida Statutes (1975), the trial court . . .

GRANT- SHOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. MOORE,, 282 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 1973)

. . . . § 440.24(1), F.S.A., which provides, in pertinent part: “In case of default by the employer or carrier . . . For the purposes of Fla.Stat. § 440.24(1), F.S.A., an order of the Judge of Industrial Claims or of the . . .

FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, a f u b o v. YELL FOR PENNELL, INC., 253 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . , the plaintiff sought to collect through the issuance by the circuit court of a rule nisi (under § 440.24 . . . court of appeal held (1) that the provision for enforcement of a Commission order by rule nisi under § 440.24 . . . amounted to a rejection of plaintiff’s effort to enforce the Commission order , by rule nisi under § 440.24 . . .

COLONIAL RESTAURANT CORPORATION, v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, a, 248 So. 2d 494 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . The complaint seeking the issuance of a rule nisi was filed pursuant to the provisions of Section 440.24 . . . 24, 1970, finding that the court had jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter “under Section 440.24 . . . As to the first point, a review of Sections 440.24(1) and 440.34(1) reflects that the provisions thereof . . . The introductory language to Section 440.24(1) provides that “in case of default by the employer or carrier . . . is not the type and character of an order capable of being enforced under the provisions of Section 440.24 . . .

LILLARD, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a, 220 So. 2d 413 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1969)

. . . . § 440.24(1), F.S.A., in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida. . . .

C. STONE, v. L. JEFFRES, Sr., 208 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 1968)

. . . . §§ 440.20(6), 440.24 and 440.34, F.S.A.) are legislative alternatives to allowance of interest on attorneys . . .

W. McCORMICK d b a s v. MESSINK,, 208 So. 2d 113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . This final judgment came about as a result of appellee filing a petition pursuant to § 440.24(1), Fla.Stats . . . This cause was brought under § 440.24, Fla.Stats., F.S.A., which states: “(1) In case of default by the . . . Commission, the order remains in full force and effect and can be enforced by a chancellor pursuant to § 440.24 . . . In his opinion, Justice Ervin stated: “Section 440.34(1) should be read in connection with Section 440.24 . . . Thus Section 440.34(1) in its broad terms read in connection with Section 440.24(1) authorizes a circuit . . .

J. MANDER, v. CONCREFORM COMPANY,, 206 So. 2d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

. . . Sec. 440.24, F.S.A., a part of the workmen’s compensation act, which gives the Circuit Court jurisdiction . . . that the attorneys would come under the clause “any beneficiary under such order”, as used in Section 440.24 . . . the Circuit Court for enforcement of any compensation order was first permitted by amendment of Sec. 440.24 . . .

STATE, CARTER v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION,, 28 Fla. Supp. 143 (Leon Cty. Cir. Ct. 1967)

. . . (Section 440.24, Florida Statutes) Also, it cannot punish for a contempt committed before it but may . . .

STEELE, v. A. D. H. BUILDING CONTRACTORS, INC. F., 196 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1967)

. . . Sec. 440.24(1) F.S.A., sought a rule nisi in the Circuit Court to enforce an order of the Florida Industrial . . . Section 440.34(1) should be read in connection with Section 440.24(1), which latter section authorizes . . . Thus Section 440.34(1) in its broad terms read in connection with Section 440.24(1) authorizes a circuit . . .

A. D. H. BUILDING CONTRACTORS, F. v. STEELE,, 171 So. 2d 184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . The ap-pellee then, pursuant to § 440.24, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., applied to the circuit court for a rule . . . Secondly, there was no authority in the circuit court under § 440.24(1) to award attorney’s fees in a . . . Section 440.27(1), Fla.Stat, F.S.A., provides that orders of the full commission entered pursuant to § 440.24 . . . for the award of attorney’s fees, attorney’s fees would not be permissible in a proceeding under § 440.24 . . . Section 440.24(1). . . .

PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, v. MERRITT,, 160 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . carrier seeks review of an order entered by a chancellor, pursuant to proceedings instituted under § 440.24 . . . Thereafter, the appellee filed a petition pursuant to the provisions of § 440.24, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., . . . , it is necessary that we determine the authority vested in the chancellor under the provision of § 440.24 . . . chancellor, pursuant to the jurisdiction and authority vested in him [pursuant to the provisions of § 440.24 . . .

MINOR, v. HEIMBACH,, 157 So. 2d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . This action was commenced by appellee-plaintiff pursuant to § 440.24, F.S.A., to enforce payment of compensation . . .

MARTINIQUE HOTEL, INC. v. KASNER,, 153 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . the respondent in a proceeding instituted by the appellee as petitioner, under the provisions of § 440.24 . . . As to the second, once again the Statute [§ 440.24(1)] itself makes it clear that there is no obligation . . . The claimant having clearly abid-ed by the terms of § 440.24(1), supra, and no error having been made . . .

STATE HARTFORD ACCIDENT INDEMNITY COMPANY, v. L. JOHNSON, W., 118 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1960)

. . . Subsequently Johnson proceeded in the Circuit Court under Section 440.24, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., to . . . issuance of such a writ to prohibit the Circuit Judge and other respondents from proceeding under Section 440.24 . . .

DAOUD v. MATZ, 73 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1954)

. . . . § 440.24, a motion which averred that the award of the deputy commissioner had become final on September . . .

WILSON v. McCOY MFG. CO., 69 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1954)

. . . Ample proof of this- quality may be found in paragraph (3) of Sec. 440.24, as it appears in Sec. 7 of . . .

ARKANSAS POWER LIGHT CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, 156 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1946)

. . . submit plans for the disposition of the remainder of $14,-207.681.43 in Account 107 of the $1,108,-440.24 . . .

In AVORN DRESS CO., 78 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1935)

. . . Sheinman credit for the $1,950 paid to the debtor in possession and required him to turn over only $440.24 . . .