Cases from cite.case.law:

KEARNS, v. FARMER ACQUISITION COMPANY d b a, 157 So. 3d 458 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . /b/a Charlotte Honda (Charlotte Honda or the Employer), asserting a claim under sections 448.101 to 448.105 . . .

ODUM, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY,, 405 F. App'x 396 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . §§ 448.101-448.105. . . .

ESCALA v. VICTORIA S SECRET STORES, LLC,, 727 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . §§ 448.101-448.105. (D.E. 1 Exh. A). . . .

DIAZ, v. KAPLAN UNIVERSITY a k a a k a Co., 567 F. Supp. 2d 1394 (S.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . . §§ 448.101-448.105; and (9) Independent Tort of Conspiracy. . . . .

HOSPICECARE OF SOUTHEAST FLORIDA, INC. v. MAJOR, M. D., 968 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Pursuant to section 448.105, Existing Rights, the Act states: This act does not diminish the rights, . . .

BOGACKI, v. BUCCANEERS LTD. PARTNERSHIP,, 370 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . §§ 448.01-448.105. . . .

P. ROLAND, v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY, LLC f k a a, 873 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 448.101-448.105, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

F. BRANCHE, v. AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC., 314 F. Supp. 2d 1194 (M.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . Finally, Plaintiffs cite to the savings clause contained in Florida Statutes Section 448.105 of the FWA . . . This Court rejects Plaintiffs argument that the savings clause in Florida Statutes Section 448.105 in . . . Second, this Court does not read the savings clause in Florida Statutes Section 448.105 to allow for . . . Section. 448.105 states that "[t]his act does not diminish the rights, privileges, or remedies of an . . . Stat. § 448.105. . . . .

DAHL, v. ECKERD FAMILY YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. a d b a, 843 So. 2d 956 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . .” §§ 112.3187(11); 448.105. Of some interest is a case from the Third District, Hutchison v. . . . also suffice to state a good cause of action under the private sector whistle-blower’s act, §§ 448.101-448.105 . . .

PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. v. KATZ,, 807 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Thereafter, Katz sought statutory relief under the Florida Whistle Blower Act, sections 448.101 through 448.105 . . .

TAYLOR, v. MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., 770 So. 2d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 448.105(1) (1995). . . .

GILLYARD, v. DELTA HEALTH GROUP, INC. d b a, 757 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Sections 448.101-448.105, F.S. is the Florida private sector Whistleblower’s Act. . . .

D. GRAY, v. WEBCO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, a, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 1999)

. . . Plaintiff may not pursue a cause of action in Count III under Florida’s Whistleblower Act, sections 448.101-448.105 . . . Section 448.105 conveys the legislature’s intention not to diminish the rights, privileges, or remedies . . .

GOLDEN, v. DODGE- MARKHAM CO. INC., 1 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (M.D. Fla. 1998)

. . . . §§ 448.101-448.105. (Docket No. 2, ¶ 1.) . . .

REHMAN, v. ECC INTERNATIONAL CORP., 698 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . were awarded to ECC as the “prevailing party” under Florida’s Whistle-blower’s Act, sections 448.101-448.105 . . .

G. HUTCHISON, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., 645 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . also suffice to state a good cause of action under the private sector whistle-blower’s act, §§ 448.101-448.105 . . . remand plaintiff be given an opportunity to amend to plead an alternative claim under sections 448.101-448.105 . . .

CAMMERMEYER, v. ASPIN,, 850 F. Supp. 910 (W.D. Wash. 1994)

. . . custody of her child based on social disapproval of her interracial marriage); Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 448.105 . . .

SCHROEDER, v. CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION,, 825 F. Supp. 1007 (S.D. Fla. 1993)

. . . . § 448.105 provides: This act does not diminish the rights, privileges, or remedies of an employee or . . . Section 448.105 of the Florida Statute does provide that the statute does not diminish the rights of . . .