Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 451.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 451.02 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 451.02

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXI
LABOR
Chapter 451
MARKETPLACE CONTRACTORS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 451.02
451.02 Marketplace contractors.
(1) A marketplace contractor must be treated as an independent contractor, and not as an employee, of the marketplace platform for all purposes under state and local laws, regulations, and ordinances, including, but not limited to, chapters 440 and 443, if all of the following conditions are met:
(a) The marketplace platform does not unilaterally prescribe specific hours during which the marketplace contractor must be available to accept service requests submitted through the platform from third-party individuals or entities.
(b) The marketplace platform does not prohibit the marketplace contractor from using the technology application offered by other marketplace platforms.
(c) The marketplace platform does not restrict the contractor from engaging in any other occupation or business.
(d) The marketplace platform and marketplace contractor agree in writing that the marketplace contractor is an independent contractor with respect to the marketplace platform.
(e) The marketplace contractor bears all or substantially all of the marketplace contractor’s expenses incurred by the marketplace contractor in performing the services.
(f) The marketplace contractor is responsible for paying taxes on the marketplace contractor’s income.
(2) Subsection (1) applies to services performed by a marketplace contractor before July 1, 2018, if the conditions set forth in subsection (1) were satisfied when the services were performed.
(3) Compliance with subsection (1) is not mandatory to establish the existence of an independent contractor relationship. The exclusion of any person or service from this section does not create any presumption and is not admissible to deny the existence of an independent contractor relationship.
(4) Third-party individuals or entities seeking services through the marketplace platform and marketplace contractors must comply with chapter 440 in the same manner as if they had not connected through the marketplace platform.
(5) This section does not apply to:
(a) Services performed in the employ of the state, a political subdivision of the state, an Indian tribe, an instrumentality of a state, or any political subdivision of a state or an Indian tribe which is wholly owned by one or more states, political subdivisions, or Indian tribes, respectively, provided that such service is excluded from employment as defined in s. 3306 of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
(b) Services performed in the employ of a religious, charitable, educational, or other organization which is excluded from employment as defined in ss. 3301-3311 of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, solely by reason of s. 3306(c)(8) of the act.
History.s. 50, ch. 2018-118.

F.S. 451.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 451.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 451.02


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 451.02
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 451.02.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 451.02

Total Results: 19

In RE: STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES and Standard Jury Instructions in Contract and Business Cases-Joint Report No. 18-01.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 260 So. 3d 965

Snippet: contract and business cases: 451.1 (Introduction); 451.2 (Summary of Claims or Contentions); 451.3 (Greater…FIDUCIARY DUTY 451.1 Introduction 451.2 Summary of Claims or Contentions 451.3 … the instructions aloud. *969 451.2 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS OR CONTENTIONS The

In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF the SUPREME COURT RELATING TO ADMISSIONS TO the BAR

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-05-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 191 So. 3d 885

Snippet: or Use of Unauthorized Materials or Equipment); 451.2 (Receipt of Unauthorized Aid); 4-51.3 (Observance

State v. Moreno-Gonzalez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-09-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 18 So. 3d 1180, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14603, 2009 WL 3100937

Snippet: L.Ed. 580 (1927); Ex parte Burford, 7 U.S. 448, 451, 2 L.Ed. 495 (1806); see also Christofferson v. Washington

Moore v. Smith-Snagg

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-08-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 793 So. 2d 1000

Snippet: deed.'" Id. at 91 (quoting 16 Am Jur. 451-2). This court summarily affirmed the 1999 summary

Zurstrassen v. Stonier

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-05-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 786 So. 2d 65

Snippet: deed.'" Id. at 91 (quoting 16 Am Jur. 451-2). Appellees rely on Sunrise Savings and Loan Ass

Mylock v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-01-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 750 So. 2d 144

Snippet: L.Ed. 580 (1927); Ex parte Burford, 7 U.S. 448, 451, 2 L.Ed. 495 (Dist.Col.1806); see also Christofferson

University of Florida v. Bowens

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-07-25T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 677 So. 2d 942

Snippet: intention to withdraw had been given." Sec. 1.451-2(a), Income Tax Regs. Just as the Acquisto court

Smith v. Willis

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-06-18T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 415 So. 2d 1331

Snippet: States, 355 U.S. 534, 539-40, 78 S.Ct. 446, 450-451, 2 L.Ed.2d 470 (1958): If * * * an administrative

In Re Fla. Rules of Judicial Administration

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1979-06-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 372 So. 2d 449

Snippet: .......... 451 2.020 Definitions .................................................. 451 2.030 The Supreme…Court ............................................ 451 2.040 District Courts of Appeal .................

City of Miami Beach v. State ex rel. Gerstein

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-12-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 242 So. 2d 170, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5334

Snippet: See generally 2 Anderson, Declaratory Judgments § 451 (2 ed. 1951). We find no error in that part of the

State v. Cauley

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-08-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 213 So. 2d 521

Snippet: under F.S.A. Section 562.451(2), F.S.A.1967. We reverse. Section 562.451(2) provides: “(2) Any person…sufficient to charge the crime defined in Section 562.451(2). See Major v. State, Fla.1965, 180 So.2d 335. The…elements of the activity proscribed by Section 562.451(2) are plain: (1) Ownership, possession or control

State v. Altman

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1958-10-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 106 So. 2d 401

Snippet: . 853, 13 So.2d 458, 461. [10] Sub-section 562.451(2), supra. [11] See paragraphs 6 to 8 of opinion

Miller v. Greene

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1958-07-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 104 So. 2d 457

Snippet: 633. 37 C.J.S. Fraud §§ 4, 5; 25 R.C.L. § 25, p. 451; 2 Williston on Contracts (Rev. ed.) §§ 485, 533;

State v. Florida State Imp. Commission

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-03-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 71 So. 2d 146

Snippet: State Improvement Commission, supra, 34 So.2d 443, 451-2. The proposed arrangements have been entered by

Marvin v. Housing Authority of Jacksonville

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1938-07-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 183 So. 145, 133 Fla. 590, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1019

Snippet: Spafford v. Brevard County, 92 Fla. 617, 118 So. 451. 2. The second question for consideration is: Are

City of Daytona Beach v. King

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1938-03-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 181 So. 1, 132 Fla. 273, 116 A.L.R. 880, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1745

Snippet: v. Central Fla. Lbr. Co., 104 Fla. 446, text p. 451-2, 140 So.2d 320, 141 So.2d 604, this Court adopted

Blount v. Bost

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1929-04-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 121 So. 472, 97 Fla. 449

Snippet: been partially erected by W. L. Bost) *Page 451 for $2,000.00; that Blount actually paid to Bost $500.00

Pensacola Electric Co. v. Soderlind

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1910-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 60 Fla. 164

Snippet: South. Rep. 755, S. C. 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 451. These two sections were incorporated into the General

Simmons v. Hanne

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1906-06-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 52 Fla. 450

Snippet: ; Dunaway v. Ferst, 51 Fla. 180, 41 South. Rep. 451; 2 Cyc. 1093. No error appearing in the record the