Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 456.056 - Full Text and Legal Analysis Florida Statute 456.056 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Fla. Stat. § 456.056 (2026) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Amendments
456.056 Treatment of Medicare beneficiaries; refusal, emergencies, consulting physicians.
(1) Effective as of January 1, 1993, as used in this section, the term:
(a) “Physician” means a physician licensed under chapter 458, an osteopathic physician licensed under chapter 459, a chiropractic physician licensed under chapter 460, a podiatric physician licensed under chapter 461, or an optometrist licensed under chapter 463.
(b) “Beneficiary” means a beneficiary of health insurance under Title XVIII of the federal Social Security Act.
(c) “Consulting physician” means any physician to whom a primary physician refers a Medicare beneficiary for treatment.
(2) A physician may refuse to treat a beneficiary. However, nothing contained in this section shall be construed to limit a physician’s obligation under state or federal law to treat a patient for an emergency medical condition, regardless of the patient’s ability to pay.
(3) If treatment is provided to a beneficiary for an emergency medical condition as defined in s. 395.002(8)(a), the physician must accept Medicare assignment provided that the requirement to accept Medicare assignment for an emergency medical condition shall not apply to treatment rendered after the patient is stabilized, or the treatment is unrelated to the original emergency medical condition. For the purpose of this subsection “stabilized” is defined to mean with respect to an emergency medical condition, that no material deterioration of the condition is likely within reasonable medical probability.
(4) If treatment provided to a beneficiary is not for such emergency medical condition, and the primary physician accepts assignment, all consulting physicians must accept assignment unless the patient agrees in writing, before receiving the treatment, that the physician need not accept assignment.
(5) Any attempt by a primary physician or a consulting physician to collect from a Medicare beneficiary any amount of charges for medical services in excess of those authorized under this section, other than the unmet deductible and the 20 percent of charges that Medicare does not pay, shall be deemed null, void, and of no merit.
History.s. 1, ch. 92-118; s. 160, ch. 92-149; s. 89, ch. 97-261; ss. 192, 265, ch. 98-166; s. 78, ch. 2000-160; s. 117, ch. 2014-17.
Note.Former s. 455.2455; s. 455.691.

Cases Citing F.S. 456.056

Copy

·State v. Crumbley, 143 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11386, 2014 WL 3673872

...The officer's contact pressured the staff at the 5We emphasize that we express no opinion on the legal or factual merit of such a theory. - 12 - doctors' offices, perhaps unintentionally, to violate their nondisclosure requirements under section 456.056(7), which provides in pertinent part: (6) Any health care practitioner licensed by the department or a board within the department who makes a physical or mental examination of, or administer...
...In any civil or criminal action, unless otherwise prohibited by law, upon the issuance of a subpoena from a court of competent jurisdiction and proper notice to the patient or the patient's legal representative by the party seeking such records. Section 456.056(7) does not prevent an ordinary citizen from exercising his or her First Amendment right to call a doctor's office seeking information about a patient....
...Whether the violation would actually lead to suppression of admissible evidence at a trial is still an open question in - 13 - this district. The Fourth District has suppressed physical evidence obtained in violation of section 456.056(7) in a doctor shopping case....
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityStahl (2016)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Cited as authorityStrickling (2015)
phrase: "rule_authority"
Copy

State of Florida v. Strickling, 164 So. 3d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 7030, 2015 WL 2219245

...ublic from seeking medical information about patients, that section does bar healthcare providers from providing such information, and law enforcement officers are precluded from pressuring healthcare providers into violating the statute: Section 456.056(7) does not prevent an ordinary citizen form exercising his or her First amendment right to call a doctor’s office seeking information about a patient....

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.