Florida Statute 465.002 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Chapter 465
PHARMACY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 465.002

465.002 Legislative findings; intent.—The Legislature finds that the practice of pharmacy is a learned profession. The sole legislative purpose for enacting this chapter is to ensure that every pharmacist practicing in this state and every pharmacy meet minimum requirements for safe practice. It is the legislative intent that pharmacists who fall below minimum competency or who otherwise present a danger to the public shall be prohibited from practicing in this state.

History.—ss. 1, 7, ch. 79-226; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 1, 26, 27, ch. 86-256; s. 59, ch. 91-137; s. 6, ch. 91-156; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 465.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 465.002 on CourtListener

Amendments to 465.002

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 465.002

Total Results: 10

State v. Canova

94 So. 2d 181

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1957 | Docket: 1412327

Cited 18 times | Published

such. Ch. 10201, Acts of Florida 1925, F.S.A. § 465.02, dealt with examination by the Board of Pharmacy

State Ex Rel. Florida Industrial Comm. v. Willis

124 So. 2d 48

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1960 | Docket: 1416101

Cited 16 times | Published

relator was granted a license to practice under Section 465.02, Florida Statutes 1949, F.S.A., then in force

City of St. Petersburg v. Austrino

898 So. 2d 955, 2005 WL 291948

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 306762

Cited 13 times | Published

practice of pharmacy is "a learned profession." § 465.002, Fla. Stat. (1997). Pharmacists are licensed and

Schiffman v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION

581 So. 2d 1375, 1991 WL 103462

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1683795

Cited 3 times | Published

legislative intent in the Florida Pharmacy Act, Section 465.002, Florida Statutes (1989).[3] Based upon these

Young v. Commissioner

926 F.2d 1083

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 19, 1991 | Docket: 66260926

Cited 1 times | Published

meaning of the Internal *1086Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 465.2 In each case, the tax court determined that the

Levine v. Hamilton

66 So. 2d 266, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1407

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 1953 | Docket: 64484506

Cited 1 times | Published

provisions of section 465.02(1) F.S.,F.S.A. It was the contention of the applicant that section 465.02(1) F.S

Attwood v. Gelbond

40 So. 2d 458, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1381

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1949 | Docket: 3259093

Cited 1 times | Published

Reargued: May 13, 1949

contends that it has the optional authority under Section 465.02, F.S.A., to withhold from the appellee such

Sorenson v. Professional Compounding Pharmacists of Western Pennsylvania, Inc.

191 So. 3d 929, 2016 WL 2726274, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7136

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2016 | Docket: 3063086

Published

be prohibited from practicing in this state.” § 465:002.' “In general, a statute , that does not purport

Block v. State

437 So. 2d 792, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 21688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1983 | Docket: 64599504

Published

the statement of legislative intent found in section 465.002, Florida Statutes (1981): 465.002 Legislative

State ex rel. Coleman v. Simmons

92 So. 2d 257

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1957 | Docket: 64488716

Published

Chapter 25238, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1949, Section 465.02, Fla. Stat.1949, F.S.A., required the Board