Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 466.018 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 466.018 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 466.018

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 466
DENTISTRY, DENTAL HYGIENE, AND DENTAL LABORATORIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 466.018
466.018 Dentist of record; patient records.
(1) Each patient shall have a dentist of record. The dentist of record shall remain primarily responsible for all dental treatment on such patient regardless of whether the treatment is rendered by the dentist or by another dentist, dental hygienist, or dental assistant rendering such treatment in conjunction with, at the direction or request of, or under the supervision of such dentist of record. The dentist of record shall be identified in the record of the patient. If treatment is rendered by a dentist other than the dentist of record or by a dental hygienist or assistant, the name or initials of such person shall be placed in the record of the patient. In any disciplinary proceeding brought pursuant to this chapter or chapter 456, it shall be presumed as a matter of law that treatment was rendered by the dentist of record unless otherwise noted on the patient record pursuant to this section. The dentist of record and any other treating dentist are subject to discipline pursuant to this chapter or chapter 456 for treatment rendered the patient and performed in violation of such chapter. One of the purposes of this section is to ensure that the responsibility for each patient is assigned to one dentist in a multidentist practice of any nature and to assign primary responsibility to the dentist for treatment rendered by a dental hygienist or assistant under her or his supervision. This section shall not be construed to assign any responsibility to a dentist of record for treatment rendered pursuant to a proper referral to another dentist not in practice with the dentist of record or to prohibit a patient from voluntarily selecting a new dentist without permission of the dentist of record.
(2) If the dentist of record is not identified in the patient record as required by subsection (1), it shall be presumed as a matter of law that the dentist of record is the owner of the dental practice in which the patient was treated. Further, the dentist of record in a multidentist practice shall not change unless the subsequent treating dentist acknowledges in writing in the record that she or he is now the dentist of record for the patient. It shall be presumed as a matter of law that a new dentist of record has taken or reviewed the patient’s medical history and dental records, that she or he has examined the patient, and that she or he has either developed a new treatment plan or has agreed to continue the preexisting treatment plan. However, the dentist of record shall be changed when the dentist of record leaves the practice where the treatment was being rendered and the patient elects to continue treatment in the office where treatment began.
(3) Every dentist shall maintain written dental records and medical history records which justify the course of treatment of the patient. The records shall include, but not be limited to, patient history, examination results, test results, and, if taken, X rays.
(4) In a multidentist practice of any nature, the owner dentist shall maintain either the original or a duplicate of all patient records, including dental charts, patient histories, examination and test results, study models, and X rays, of any patient treated by a dentist at the owner dentist’s practice facility. The purpose of this requirement is to impose a duty upon the owner of a multidentist practice to maintain patient records for all patients treated at the owner’s practice facility whether or not the owner was involved in the patient’s treatment. This subsection does not relieve the dentist of record in a multidentist practice of the responsibility to maintain patient records. An owner dentist of a multidentist practice may be relieved of the responsibility to maintain the original or duplicate patient records for patients treated at the owner dentist’s practice facility if, upon request of the patient or the patient’s legal representative, she or he transfers custody of the records to another dentist, the patient, or the patient’s legal representative and retains, in lieu of the records, a written statement, signed by the owner dentist, the person who received the records, and two witnesses, that lists the date, the records that were transferred, and the persons to whom the records were transferred. Further, the dentist of record may be relieved of the responsibility to maintain the original or duplicate patient records if she or he leaves the practice where the treatment was rendered, transfers custody of the records to the owner of the practice, and retains, in lieu of the records, a written statement, signed by the dentist of record, the owner of the practice, and two witnesses, that lists the date and the records that were transferred. The owner dentist shall provide reasonable access to duplicate records at cost.
(5) All patient records kept in accordance with this section shall be maintained for a period of 4 years from the date of the patient’s last appointment.
History.ss. 1, 3, ch. 79-330; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 3, 41, ch. 82-179; ss. 11, 23, 24, ch. 86-291; s. 60, ch. 91-137; s. 7, ch. 91-156; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 257, ch. 97-103; s. 71, ch. 98-166; s. 130, ch. 2000-160.

F.S. 466.018 on Google Scholar

F.S. 466.018 on Casetext

Amendments to 466.018


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 466.018
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 466.018.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 466.018

Total Results: 8

McDonald v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-13

Citation: 582 So. 2d 660, 1991 WL 103477

Snippet: 462.14(1)(k), 462.14(1)(q), 465.016(1)(i), 466.018(1), 466.018(2), 466.028(1)(q), 468.217(1)(k), 468.365(1)(r)

Consumers Water Co. v. City of South Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-04-11

Citation: 151 So. 2d 845, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3578, 1963 WL 110887

Snippet: decision in the case of Smyth v. Ames, 169 U.S. 466, 18 S.Ct. 418, 42 L.Ed. 819, dealing with the right

Jacksonville Gas Corp. v. Florida RR & Pub. U. Com'n

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1951-01-05

Citation: 50 So. 2d 887

Snippet: States in the case of Smyth v. Ames, 169 U.S. 466 [18 S.Ct. 418], 42 L.Ed. 819, wherein the court came

State ex rel. Triay v. Burr

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1920-03-19

Citation: 79 Fla. 290, 84 So. 61

Snippet: 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 400; Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 418; Home Telephone & Telegraph Co

State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1915-04-20

Citation: 69 Fla. 473

Snippet: decided March 8th, 1915; Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 418. While the road of the carrier

State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Seaboard Air Line Railway

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1904-06-15

Citation: 48 Fla. 129

Snippet: of domestic rates. See Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 418; Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co

Lane v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1902-01-15

Citation: 44 Fla. 105

Snippet: Mass. 155; Wallace v. United States, 162 U. S. 466, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 859; Duncan v. State, 84 Ind. 204;

State ex rel. Lamar v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1899-06-15

Citation: 41 Fla. 377

Snippet: C. 40 L. R. A. 389; Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 418; Lake Shore & Michigan Southern