Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 479.11 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 479.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 479.11 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 479.11

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 479
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 479.11
479.11 Specified signs prohibited.No sign shall be erected, used, operated, or maintained:
(1) Within 660 feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of any portion of the interstate highway system or the federal-aid primary highway system, except as provided in ss. 479.111 and 479.16.
(2) Beyond 660 feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of any portion of the interstate highway system or the federal-aid primary highway system outside an urban area, which sign is erected for the purpose of its message being read from the main-traveled way of such system, except as provided in ss. 479.111(1) and 479.16.
(3) Within 15 feet of the outside boundary of the right-of-way of any highway on the State Highway System outside of an incorporated area or on the interstate or federal-aid primary highway system outside an incorporated area.
(4) Within 100 feet of any church, school, cemetery, public park, public reservation, public playground, or state or national forest, when such facility is located outside of an incorporated area, except as provided in s. 479.16.
(5)(a) Which displays intermittent lights not embodied in the sign, or any rotating or flashing light within 100 feet of the outside boundary of the right-of-way of any highway on the State Highway System, interstate highway system, or federal-aid primary highway system or which is illuminated in such a manner so as to cause glare or to impair the vision of motorists or otherwise distract motorists so as to interfere with the motorists’ ability to safely operate their vehicles.
(b) If the sign is on the premises of an establishment as provided in s. 479.16(1), the local government authority with jurisdiction over the location of the sign shall enforce the provisions of this section as provided in chapter 162 and this section.
(6) Which uses the word “stop” or “danger,” or presents or implies the need or requirement of stopping or the existence of danger, or which is a copy or imitation of official signs, and which is adjacent to the right-of-way of any highway on the State Highway System, interstate highway system, or federal-aid primary highway system.
(7) Which is placed on the inside of a curve or in any manner that may prevent persons using the highway from obtaining an unobstructed view of approaching vehicles and which is adjacent to the right-of-way of any highway on the State Highway System, interstate highway system, or federal-aid primary highway system.
(8) Which is located upon the right-of-way of any highway on the State Highway System, interstate highway system, or federal-aid primary highway system.
(9) Which is nailed, fastened, or affixed to any tree or is erected or maintained in an unsafe, insecure, or unsightly condition and which is adjacent to the right-of-way of any highway on the State Highway System outside of an incorporated area or on any portion of the interstate highway system or the federal-aid primary highway system.
(10) Which is on a new highway outside an urban area and otherwise would have been subject to the permit requirements of this chapter.
History.s. 9, ch. 20446, 1941; s. 3, ch. 26959, 1951; s. 1, ch. 31413, 1956; s. 1, ch. 57-282; s. 2, ch. 61-151; s. 5, ch. 71-971; s. 2, ch. 75-202; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 12, 25, 26, ch. 84-227; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 44, ch. 94-237; s. 32, ch. 95-257; s. 4, ch. 2012-83.

F.S. 479.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 479.11 on CourtListener

Amendments to 479.11


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 479.11

Total Results: 23

Walker v. State, Dept. of Transp.

366 So. 2d 96, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14026

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1979 | Docket: 1655442

Cited 12 times | Published

of compensation, for its nonconformance to Section 479.11, implementing the Highway Beautification Act

Hancock Advertising v. Dept. of Transp.

549 So. 2d 1086, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2285, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5309, 1989 WL 110924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1989 | Docket: 1719626

Cited 7 times | Published

interstate highway system, as set forth in section 479.11(1).[3]See Atlantic Outdoor Advertising v. Department

Henderson Signs v. Fla. Dept. of Transp.

397 So. 2d 769, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19667

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 1981 | Docket: 1357103

Cited 7 times | Published

"highway" appears both in Section 479.07 and in Section 479.11.[1] The term highway is defined in Section

Wainwright v. State Dept. of Transp.

488 So. 2d 563, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 938, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7378

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1986 | Docket: 1685424

Cited 6 times | Published

from the main travelled way." To that end, Section 479.11(1), Florida Statutes, provides that "no sign

Tri-State System v. Deppartment of Transportation

491 So. 2d 1192, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1548

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1986 | Docket: 1721936

Cited 5 times | Published

visible from the maintraveled way. To that end, Section 479.11(1) provides that no sign shall be erected in

Café Erotica v. Florida Dept. of Transp.

830 So. 2d 181, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15490, 2002 WL 31373490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2002 | Docket: 471444

Cited 4 times | Published

intentionally distract or confuse travelers. See, e.g., § 479.11(5), Fla. Stat. (2001) (prohibiting signs displaying

Nelson Richard Advertising v. DOT

513 So. 2d 181, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1987 | Docket: 1295227

Cited 4 times | Published

the circumstances of this case. We disagree. Section 479.11(1), Florida Statutes (1983), prohibits outdoor

Hammond v. Department of Transp.

493 So. 2d 33, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1748, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9300

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1986 | Docket: 1671704

Cited 3 times | Published

above exception to the prohibition contained in Section 479.11(1), Florida Statutes, and thus is legally in

Tri-State Systems v. Dept. of Transp.

492 So. 2d 1164, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1757, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1986 | Docket: 478279

Cited 2 times | Published

WILLIS, Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] Section 479.11, Florida Statutes (1981), provides in part:

City of Lake Wales v. LAMAR ADVER.

399 So. 2d 981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1981 | Docket: 1167397

Cited 2 times | Published

"conflict" in § 11(5). And it cannot be said that § 479.11(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and Dade County

Henderson Sign Service v. Dept. of Transp.

390 So. 2d 159

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1980 | Docket: 1750252

Cited 2 times | Published

prohibited by the 600-foot setback provisions of Section 479.11, Florida Statutes (1977), and none displayed

White Adver. International v. Fla. Dept. of Transp.

364 So. 2d 104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1978 | Docket: 461969

Cited 2 times | Published

on December 8, 1971, even though violative of § 479.11(2), because located within 660 feet of a portion

Department of Transportation v. Durden

471 So. 2d 1271, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 317, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3485

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1985 | Docket: 64612852

Cited 1 times | Published

were in an unpermitted zone, in violation of section 479.11(1), Florida Statutes (1983), and were constructed

Lamar Advertising Co. v. Department of Transportation

559 So. 2d 240, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1576, 1990 WL 25960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1990 | Docket: 64649479

Published

292 in Escam-bia County was in violation of section 479.-11(4), Florida Statutes, which prohibits placement

Atlantic Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation

518 So. 2d 384, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 100, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11848, 1987 WL 31971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1987 | Docket: 64631984

Published

sign; 4) whether appellant’s sign violates section 479.11(1); and 5) whether appellant’s sign violates

Chipley Motel v. Department of Transportation

498 So. 2d 1357, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 70, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11036

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1986 | Docket: 64623752

Published

77 in Washington County, was in violation of section 479.11, Florida Statutes (1983), and rule 14-10.05(1)

Best Western Tivoli Inn v. Department of Transportation

448 So. 2d 1052, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1984 | Docket: 64604291

Published

Interstate 10 and State Road 79 in Holmes County. Section 479.11, Florida Statutes (1981), generally prohibits

National Advertising Co. v. Florida Department of Transportation

418 So. 2d 1142, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20978

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 1982 | Docket: 64591925

Published

proving not only that there was a violation of Section 479.11(1), Florida Statutes (1981), but also that

Reddock v. Department of Transportation

390 So. 2d 818, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 1980 | Docket: 64579027

Published

Interstate Highway 10 in Jackson County is AFFIRMED. Section 479.11, Florida Statutes (1979); Henderson Sign Service

Johnson & Johnson, Inc. v. Florida Department of Transportation

371 So. 2d 494, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1979 | Docket: 64570394

Published

statutory provision regulating lighting is Section 479.11, which prohibits erection of any sign which

Lee v. Florida Department of Transportation

366 So. 2d 116, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 13947

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1979 | Docket: 64567945

Published

Department of Transportation.” . Fla.Stat. § 479.11(1): “No advertisement, advertising sign or advertising

Walker v. State, Department of Transportation

352 So. 2d 126, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 1977 | Docket: 64561409

Published

to an interstate highway are in violation of Section 479.11(1) and (2), Florida Statutes (1975). The signs

Harrison v. State, Department of Transportation

349 So. 2d 720, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1977 | Docket: 64560047

Published

right-of-way of Interstate 10, in violation of Section 479.11, Florida Statutes (1975). Petitioner relies