479.111
Specified signs allowed within controlled portions of the interstate and federal-aid primary highway system.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
479.111 Specified signs allowed within controlled portions of the interstate and federal-aid primary highway system.—Only the following signs shall be allowed within controlled portions of the interstate highway system and the federal-aid primary highway system as set forth in s. 479.11(1) and (2):
(2) Signs in commercial-zoned and industrial-zoned areas or commercial-unzoned and industrial-unzoned areas and within 660 feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way, subject to the requirements set forth in the 1972 agreement between the state and the United States Department of Transportation.
(3) Signs for which permits are not required under s. 479.16.
History.—s. 6, ch. 71-971; s. 3, ch. 75-202; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; s. 3, ch. 78-8; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 13, 25, 26, ch. 84-227; s. 75, ch. 85-81; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 15, ch. 2014-215; s. 36, ch. 2014-223.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1982–2001 · leading case: T & L MANAGEMENT v. Dept. of Transp.
T & L MANAGEMENT v. Dept. of Transp. (1986)
“Specifically, Section 479.111, Florida Statutes, prohibits outdoor advertising adjacent to interstate highways within 660 feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way, except within zoned or unzoned commercial areas.”
Chancellor Media Whiteco Outdoor Corporation v. Dot (2001)
“[3] The recommended order concluded that the signs were nonconforming both because they were not on property zoned or otherwise designated for commercial or industrial use, see § 479.111(2), Fla. Stat. (1997), and because they did not meet statutory spacing requirements.”
Atlantic Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation (1987)
“Appellant contends that because its sign was located in an area zoned as commercial intensive, section 479.111(2), an exception to 479.11(1), should apply.”
Tri-State Systems, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp. (1986)
“[2] Section 479.111, Florida Statutes (1983), provides in part: Only the following signs shall be allowed within controlled portions of the interstate highway system.”
BILL SALTER OUTDOOR v. Department of Transp. (1986)
“" Outdoor advertising signs are allowed in such a location pursuant to section 479.111(2), Florida Statutes, and DOT approved appellant's applications and granted the requested permits.”
Wainwright v. State Dept. of Transp. (1986)
“Section 479.111(2). Rule 14-10.09(I)(1)(B), F.”
Best Western Tivoli Inn v. Department of Transportation (1984)
“05(6) was intended to mean that zoning created primarily to permit outdoor advertising would not qualify as an exception pursuant to section 479.111, Florida Statutes, even if it was validly adopted as a part of comprehensive zoning.”
Nelson Richard Advertising v. DOT (1987)
“11(1), Florida Statutes (1983), prohibits outdoor advertising "[w]ithin 660 feet of the nearest edge of the right-of-way of all portions of the interstate system or the federal-aid primary system except as provided in s.”
Tri-State Systems v. Dept. of Transp. (1986)
“Section 479.111, Florida Statutes (1981), provides in part: Only the following signs shall be permitted .”
National Advertising Co. v. Florida Department of Transportation (1982)
“11(1), Florida Statutes (1981), but also that the advertising structures did not fall within the exception provided in Section 479.111(2), Florida Statutes (1981), and that *1143 since the support poles for the signs were set in concrete prior to 8 December 1971, the signs were…”
BEST WEST. TIVOLI INN v. Dept. of Transp. (1983)
“" Section 479.111(2) authorizes signs "in commercial and industrial zoned areas.”
Fuqua & Davis, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation (1986)
“Section 479.111, Florida Statutes provides that: Only the following signs shall be allowed within controlled portions of the interstate highway system and the federal-aid primary highway system .”
— 479.111(2) — 7 cases
Chancellor Media Whiteco Outdoor Corporation v. Dot (2001)
“[3] The recommended order concluded that the signs were nonconforming both because they were not on property zoned or otherwise designated for commercial or industrial use, see § 479.111(2), Fla. Stat. (1997), and because they did not meet statutory spacing requirements.”
Atlantic Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation (1987)
“Appellant contends that because its sign was located in an area zoned as commercial intensive, section 479.111(2), an exception to 479.11(1), should apply.”
BILL SALTER OUTDOOR v. Department of Transp. (1986)
“" Outdoor advertising signs are allowed in such a location pursuant to section 479.111(2), Florida Statutes, and DOT approved appellant's applications and granted the requested permits.”
Wainwright v. State Dept. of Transp. (1986)
“Section 479.111(2). Rule 14-10.09(I)(1)(B), F.”
National Advertising Co. v. Florida Department of Transportation (1982)
“11(1), Florida Statutes (1981), but also that the advertising structures did not fall within the exception provided in Section 479.111(2), Florida Statutes (1981), and that *1143 since the support poles for the signs were set in concrete prior to 8 December 1971, the signs were…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.