Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 479.15 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 479.15 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 479.15 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 479.15

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 479
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 479.15
479.15 Harmony of regulations.
(1) A zoning board or commission or other public officer or agency may not issue a permit to erect a sign that is prohibited under this chapter or the rules of the department, and the department may not issue a permit for a sign that is prohibited by any other public board, officer, or agency in the lawful exercise of its powers.
(2) A municipality, county, local zoning authority, or other local governmental entity may not remove, or cause to be removed, a lawfully erected sign along any portion of the interstate or federal-aid primary highway system without first paying just compensation for such removal. A local governmental entity may not cause in any way the alteration of a lawfully erected sign located along any portion of the interstate or federal-aid primary highway system without payment of just compensation if such alteration constitutes a taking under state law. The municipality, county, local zoning authority, or other local governmental entity that adopts requirements for such alteration shall pay just compensation to the sign owner if such alteration constitutes a taking under state law. This subsection applies only to a lawfully erected sign the subject matter of which relates to premises other than the premises on which it is located or to merchandise, services, activities, or entertainment not sold, produced, manufactured, or furnished on the premises on which the sign is located. This subsection may not be interpreted as explicit or implicit legislative recognition that alterations do or do not constitute a taking under state law.
(3) It is the express intent of the Legislature to limit the state right-of-way acquisition costs on state and federal roads in eminent domain proceedings, ss. 479.07 and 479.155 notwithstanding. Subject to approval by the Federal Highway Administration, if public acquisition of land upon which is situated a lawfully permitted sign occurs as provided in this chapter, the sign may, at the election of its owner and the department, be relocated or reconstructed adjacent to the new right-of-way and in close proximity to the current site if the sign is not relocated in an area inconsistent with s. 479.024. Such relocation is subject to the requirements in the 1972 agreement between the state and the United States Department of Transportation. The sign owner shall pay all costs associated with relocating or reconstructing a sign under this subsection, and the state or any local government may not reimburse the sign owner for such costs, unless part of such relocation costs is required by federal law. If adjacent property is not available for the relocation, the department is responsible for paying the owner of the sign just compensation for its removal.
(4) For a nonconforming sign, the face of the sign may not be increased in size or height or structurally modified at the point of relocation in a manner inconsistent with the current building codes of the jurisdiction in which the sign is located.
(5) If relocation can be accomplished but is inconsistent with the ordinances of the municipality or county within whose jurisdiction the sign is located, the ordinances of the local government shall prevail if the local government assumes the responsibility to provide the owner of the sign just compensation for its removal. Compensation paid by the local government may not be greater than the compensation required under state or federal law. This section does not impair any agreement or future agreements between a municipality or county and the owner of a sign or signs within the jurisdiction of the municipality or county.
(6) Subsections (3), (4), and (5) do not apply within the jurisdiction of a municipality that is engaged in litigation concerning its sign ordinance on April 23, 1999, and the subsections do not apply to a municipality whose boundaries are identical to the county within which the municipality is located.
(7) This section does not cause a neighboring sign that is already permitted and that is within the spacing requirements established in s. 479.07(9)(a) to become nonconforming.
History.s. 13, ch. 20446, 1941; s. 5, ch. 67-461; ss. 23, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 74-273; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 15, 25, 26, ch. 84-227; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 41, ch. 94-237; s. 65, ch. 99-385; s. 5, ch. 2002-13; s. 16, ch. 2014-215; s. 37, ch. 2014-223.

F.S. 479.15 on Google Scholar

F.S. 479.15 on CourtListener

Amendments to 479.15


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 479.15

Total Results: 11

LAMAR-ORLANDO, ETC. v. City of Ormond Beach

415 So. 2d 1312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1982 | Docket: 459241

Cited 13 times | Published

remedy sought by the City had been preempted by section 479.15(3), Florida Statutes (1979).[4] We sustain

Scavella v. Fernandez

371 So. 2d 535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1979 | Docket: 1786895

Cited 11 times | Published

the court pointed out, at 425 F.2d 1150: "Section 479.15, supra, clearly indicates that Chapter 479

Café Erotica v. Florida Dept. of Transp.

830 So. 2d 181, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15490, 2002 WL 31373490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2002 | Docket: 471444

Cited 4 times | Published

historic, cultural, and educational interest. § 479.015, Fla. Stat. (2001). Traffic safety and the appearance

T & L MANAGEMENT v. Dept. of Transp.

497 So. 2d 685, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2279

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1986 | Docket: 1242856

Cited 3 times | Published

is entitled to just compensation pursuant to Section 479.15(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984). We disagree

FLA. DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. ET Legg & Co.

472 So. 2d 1336, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1795, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1985 | Docket: 1793838

Cited 3 times | Published

spacing requirement of the DOT. The court cited section 479.15(1), Florida Statutes (1977), which provided

La Pointe Outdoor Advertising v. Florida Dept. of Transp.

382 So. 2d 1347, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1980 | Docket: 1255603

Cited 3 times | Published

County permit does not change this result. Section 479.15(1), Florida Statutes (1977), provides: "no

McDonald's Corp. v. Dept. of Transp.

535 So. 2d 323, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2663, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5405, 1988 WL 130475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1988 | Docket: 1305865

Cited 2 times | Published

be used in conjunction with that activity. Section 479.015 is a statement of the legislative intent behind

City of Lake Wales v. LAMAR ADVER.

399 So. 2d 981

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1981 | Docket: 1167397

Cited 2 times | Published

contradictory in the sense that they cannot coexist. Section 479.15, supra, clearly indicates that Chapter 479

Flamingo Lake RV Resort, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.

599 So. 2d 732, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6208, 1992 WL 114652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1992 | Docket: 2273278

Cited 1 times | Published

contrary to the legislative intent contained in Section 479.015, Florida Statutes (1989). Moreover, we know

LABORERS'INTERN, L. 478 v. Burroughs

522 So. 2d 852

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 1988 | Docket: 1660861

Cited 1 times | Published

1150, which dealt with billboard regulations: Section 479.15 ... clearly indicates that Chapter 479 was

LAMAR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATES OF EAST FLA., LTD. v. City of Daytona Beach

450 So. 2d 1145, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12767

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 1984 | Docket: 1728996

Published

lawfully in existence on December 8, 1971. Section 479.15(2), Florida Statutes, provides: No municipality