Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 485.002 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 485.002 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 485.002

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXII
REGULATION OF PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS
Chapter 485
HYPNOSIS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 485.002
485.002 Legislative intent.
(1) It is recognized that hypnosis has attained a significant place as another technique in the treatment of human injury, disease, and illness, both mental and physical; that the utilization of hypnotic techniques for therapeutic purposes should be restricted to certain practitioners of the healing arts who are qualified by professional training to fulfill the necessary criteria required for diagnosis and treatment of human illness, disease, or injury within the scope of their own particular field of competence; or that such hypnotic techniques should be employed by qualified individuals who work under the direction, supervision, or prescription of such practitioners.
(2) It is the intent of the Legislature to provide for certain practitioners of the healing arts, such as a trained and qualified dentist, to use hypnosis for hypnoanesthesia or for the allaying of anxiety in relation to dental work; however, under no circumstances shall it be legal or proper for the dentist or the individual to whom the dentist may refer the patient, to use hypnosis for the treatment of the neurotic difficulties of a patient. The same applies to the optometrist, podiatric physician, chiropractic physician, osteopathic physician, or physician of medicine.
(3) It is, therefore, the intent and purpose of this chapter to regulate the practice of hypnosis for therapeutic purposes by providing that such hypnotic techniques shall be used only by certain practitioners of the healing arts within the limits and framework of their own particular field of competence; or by qualified persons to whom a patient may be referred, in which event the referring practitioner of the healing arts shall be responsible, severally or jointly, for any injury or damages resulting to the patient because of either his or her own incompetence, or the incompetence of the person to whom the patient was referred.
History.s. 1, ch. 61-506; s. 2, ch. 65-170; s. 194, ch. 97-103; s. 48, ch. 97-264; ss. 195, 267, ch. 98-166; s. 201, ch. 2000-160.
Note.Former s. 456.31.

F.S. 485.002 on Google Scholar

F.S. 485.002 on Casetext

Amendments to 485.002


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 485.002
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 485.002.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 485.002

Total Results: 7

ISAAC M. DILVER, JR. v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-11-15T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: an injunction against stalking (section 784.0485) are two distinct types of injunctions arising from

Nickesha Reid v. Tachita Saunders

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-09-25T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: emotional distress in a reasonable person. See §§ 784.0485(2), Fla. Stat. (defining stalking); 784.048(1)(a)

Richards v. Gonzalez

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-10-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 178 So. 3d 451, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15188, 2015 WL 5973843

Snippet: injunction vacated. 1 . Section 784.0485(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), specifically directs

Morris v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1975-10-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 322 So. 2d 489, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18775

Snippet: five years”. Swan v. State, Fla.1975, 322 So.2d 485. The two contentions of error presented and argued by

Tolin v. Pearce-Simpson, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1966-05-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 186 So. 2d 65, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5326

Snippet: plaintiff would lose profits in the amount of $11,485, and (2) that the chancellor erroneously adopted this

Zapetis v. Wills

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-09-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 156 So. 2d 33

Snippet: Zapetis received as the proceeds of a charter, $2,485.02, which he retained (T. 676). However, Wills received

Bartholf v. Baker

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1954-03-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 71 So. 2d 480

Snippet: which he received from Bartholf, was a little over *485 $2,800 per year. His life expectancy was 15.61 years