The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 1125(a) Count II: Florida Trademark Infringement under Florida Statute § 495.131 Count III: Common . . .
. . . . § 495.131; (5) Florida common law trademark infringement and unfair competition; and (6) cancellation . . .
. . . . § 495.131 and a common law claim for infringement and unfair competition [D.E: 1 ¶¶ 53-65]. . . .
. . . . § 495.131 et seq.; (4) violating the Florida Trademarlc Dilution Act, Fla. . . .
. . . intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, trademark infringement under Florida Statutes § 495.131 . . .
. . . . § 495.131); (4) Florida state trademark dilution (Fla.Stat. § 495.151); (5) Unfair Competition under . . .
. . . . § 495.131 and Florida common law; and Common Law Unfair Competition. (Dkts.l, 80). . . .
. . . There was no allegation of infringement pursuant to section 495.131, Florida Statutes (2001). . . . .
. . . . § 495.131, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . .
. . . . § 495.131 (West 1988) and pursue remedies under FLA.STAT.ANN. § 495.141 (West 1988). . . . alleges service mark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq., and FLA.STAT.ANN. § 495.131 . . .
. . . judge correctly states that the gist of an infringement claim, under both the common law and section 495.131 . . . Section 495.131 provides in relevant part: Subject to the provisions of s. 495.161 [recognizing common . . . the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1114(1), is very similar to that found in the Florida statute, section 495.131 . . . Only a handful of Florida cases have had opportunity to address Florida’s infringement statute, § 495.131 . . . 493 So.2d 37; American Bank, 455 So.2d 443, and these cases provide limited insight in construing § 495.131 . . .
. . . Trust, 455 So.2d 443, 445-47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 461 So.2d 114 (Fla.1985); § 495.131 . . .
. . . Section 1338, and under Sections 495.131 and 495.161, Florida Statutes 1983. 28. . . .
. . . contend the use of the word Leathergram in the column constituted infringement pursuant to section 495.131 . . . Section 495.131(1) infringement requires that thq use of the service mark be “likely to cause confusion . . . Section 495.131(2) infringement requires application of the service mark to “labels, signs, prints, packages . . .
. . . mark or symbol), (2) for statutory damages for infringement of a registered service mark under section 495.131 . . . defendant’s knowledge that its mark is intended to be used to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive (§ 495.131 . . .
. . . . §§ 495.131, 495.141 (West 1972), disgorgement of profits earned is not the remedy for breach of contract . . .
. . . . § 1125(a); Count III alleges infringement and dilution of a trademark under sections 495.131 and 495 . . .
. . . .-151, unlike other Florida trademark statutes, see §§ 495.131 & 495.141, however, do not limit the protection . . .
. . . Sec. 495.131 (i). . . .
. . . Section 495.131, F.S.A., which provides infringement of a registered mark shall subject the infringer . . .
. . . . § 495.131(1), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides that this right to injunctive relief accrues to the owner . . .