Florida Statute 499.61 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 499
FLORIDA DRUG AND COSMETIC ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 499.61

499.61 Definitions.—As used in this part:

(1) “Dealer” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity selling, brokering, or transferring ether to anyone other than a licensed ether manufacturer, distributor, or dealer.

(2) “Department” means the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

(3) “Distributor” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity distributing, selling, marketing, transferring, or otherwise supplying ether to retailers, dealers, or any other entity in the primary channel of trade, but does not include retailers.

(4) “Ether” means diethyl ether in any form.

(5) “Manufacturer” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity preparing, deriving, producing, synthesizing, or otherwise making ether in any form or repacking, relabeling, or manipulating ether.

(6) “Purchaser” means any person, firm, corporation, or other entity who purchases ether in quantities of 2.5 gallons, or equivalent by weight, or more for any purpose whatsoever, but does not include a dealer, distributor, or manufacturer.

History.—ss. 10, 11, ch. 86-133; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 242, ch. 99-8; s. 8, ch. 2012-143; s. 124, ch. 2012-184.

F.S. 499.61 on Google Scholar

F.S. 499.61 on Casetext

Amendments to 499.61

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 499.61

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 499.61.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 499.61

Total Results: 7

Hassenteufel v. Howard Johnson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1951-05-18

Citation: 52 So. 2d 810, 1951 Fla. LEXIS 1372

Snippet: Gilbert v. American Surety Co., 7 Cir., 121 F. 499, 61 L.R.A. 253." See Case v. Smith, 146 Fla. 340, 200

Jones v. the City of Arcadia

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-06-27

Citation: 3 So. 2d 338, 147 Fla. 571, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1325

Snippet: officials. Greene v. Louisville I. R. Co.,244 U.S. 499, 61 Law. Ed. 1280." See City of West Palm Beach v.

The Arundel Corp. v. Sproul

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1939-01-24

Citation: 186 So. 679, 136 Fla. 167, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1533

Snippet: officials. Greene v. Louisville I.R. Co., 244 U.S. 499,61 L. Ed. 1280." See City of Bradeston v. Seaboard

Commercial Credit Corp. v. Boswell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1933-02-03

Citation: 146 So. 199, 108 Fla. 213

Snippet: 809; Gilbert v. American Surety Co., 121 Fed. 499, 61 L.R.A. 253. The ruling on the demurrers being erroneous

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Amos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-08-01

Citation: 98 Fla. 350

Snippet: officials. Greene v. Louisville & I. R. Co., 244 U. S. 499, 61 Law Ed. 1280. But it is contended here that because

L. N. R. R. Co. v. Amos

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1929-08-01

Citation: 123 So. 745, 98 Fla. 350

Snippet: officials. Greene v. Louisville I. R. Co.,244 U.S. 499, 61 Law Ed. 1280. But it is contended here that because

Camp Phosphate Co. v. Allen

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1919-04-02

Citation: 77 Fla. 341, 81 So. 503

Snippet: Green v. Louisville & Interurban R. Co., 244 U. S. 499, 61 L. Ed. 1280, —Sup. Ct. Rep. —, when the court said: