Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 501.207 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 501.207 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 501.207 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 501.207

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 501
CONSUMER PROTECTION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 501.207
501.207 Remedies of enforcing authority.
(1) The enforcing authority may bring:
(a) An action to obtain a declaratory judgment that an act or practice violates this part.
(b) An action to enjoin any person who has violated, is violating, or is otherwise likely to violate, this part.
(c) An action on behalf of one or more consumers or governmental entities for the actual damages caused by an act or practice in violation of this part. However, damages are not recoverable under this section against a retailer who has in good faith engaged in the dissemination of claims of a manufacturer or wholesaler without actual knowledge that it violated this part.
(2) Before bringing an action under paragraph (1)(a) or paragraph (1)(c), the head of the enforcing authority shall review the matter and determine if an enforcement action serves the public interest. This determination shall be made in writing, but shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter 120.
(3) Upon motion of the enforcing authority or any interested party in any action brought under subsection (1), the court may make appropriate orders, including, but not limited to, appointment of a general or special magistrate or receiver or sequestration or freezing of assets, to reimburse consumers or governmental entities found to have been damaged; to carry out a transaction in accordance with the reasonable expectations of consumers or governmental entities; to strike or limit the application of clauses of contracts to avoid an unconscionable result; to bring actions in the name of and on behalf of the defendant enterprise, without regard to any wrongful acts that were committed by the enterprise; to order any defendant to divest herself or himself of any interest in any enterprise, including real estate; to impose reasonable restrictions upon the future activities of any defendant to impede her or him from engaging in or establishing the same type of endeavor; to order the dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise; or to grant legal, equitable, or other appropriate relief. The court may assess the expenses of a general or special magistrate or receiver against a person who has violated, is violating, or is otherwise likely to violate this part. Any injunctive order, whether temporary or permanent, issued by the court shall be effective throughout the state unless otherwise provided in the order.
(4) If a violator shows that a violation of this part resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid the error, recovery under this section is limited to the amount, if any, by which the violator was unjustly enriched by the violation.
(5) No action may be brought by the enforcing authority under this section more than 4 years after the occurrence of a violation of this part or more than 2 years after the last payment in a transaction involved in a violation of this part, whichever is later.
(6) The enforcing authority may terminate an investigation or an action upon acceptance of a person’s written assurance of voluntary compliance with this part. Acceptance of an assurance may be conditioned on a commitment to reimburse consumers or governmental entities, make contributions, pay civil penalties, pay attorney’s fees and costs, or take other appropriate corrective action. An assurance is not evidence of a prior violation of this part. However, unless an assurance has been rescinded by agreement of the parties or voided by a court for good cause, subsequent failure to comply with the terms of an assurance is prima facie evidence of a violation of this part. Such assurance is not a limitation upon any action or remedy available to a person aggrieved by a violation of this part.
(7) In any trial or other proceeding brought by the enforcing authority pursuant to this part, statements having circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness may be used to supplement and explain other evidence and shall not be excluded as hearsay evidence, even though the declarant is available as a witness, if the trier of fact determines that:
(a) The statement is offered as evidence of a material fact;
(b) The statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and
(c) The general purpose of the Florida Rules of Evidence and the interests of justice will be best served by the admission of such statement into evidence.

However, a statement may not be admitted hereunder unless the proponent of it makes known to the adverse party, sufficiently in advance of the trial or proceeding to provide the adverse party with a fair opportunity to prepare to meet it, the proponent’s intention to offer the statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant.

History.s. 1, ch. 73-124; s. 3, ch. 79-386; s. 2, ch. 85-3; s. 4, ch. 90-190; s. 4, ch. 92-133; s. 8, ch. 93-38; s. 629, ch. 97-103; s. 3, ch. 2001-39; s. 24, ch. 2001-214; s. 89, ch. 2004-11; s. 3, ch. 2006-196.

F.S. 501.207 on Google Scholar

F.S. 501.207 on CourtListener

Amendments to 501.207


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 501.207

Total Results: 26

Millennium Communications & Fulfillment, Inc. v. Office of Atty. Gen.

761 So. 2d 1256, 2000 WL 986399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 19, 2000 | Docket: 1300298

Cited 76 times | Published

and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA"), section 501.207(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1997).[1] For the

State v. De Anza Corp.

416 So. 2d 1173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1982 | Docket: 1224362

Cited 14 times | Published

of Counts I through IV, but not of Count V. Section 501.207(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), the authority

Chicken Unlimited, Inc. v. Bockover

374 So. 2d 96

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1979 | Docket: 430697

Cited 11 times | Published

action brought by an enforcing authority under Section 501.207(1)(a) or (b), this statute makes it clear that

Chicken Unlimited, Inc. v. Bockover

374 So. 2d 96

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 1979 | Docket: 430697

Cited 11 times | Published

action brought by an enforcing authority under Section 501.207(1)(a) or (b), this statute makes it clear that

Warren Tech. v. Hines Interests Ltd.

733 So. 2d 1146, 1999 WL 391858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1999 | Docket: 1659896

Cited 10 times | Published

those who engage in unfair trade practices. See § 501.207, Fla. Stat. (1991). The Act also permits private

State Ex Rel. Herring v. Murdock

345 So. 2d 759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1977 | Docket: 1477754

Cited 7 times | Published

specifically relied on the authority granted in Section 501.207(1)(b) "to enjoin a supplier who ... is violating

Black v. Department of Legal Affairs

353 So. 2d 655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 28, 1977 | Docket: 1521895

Cited 6 times | Published

been previously engaged." Subsection (3) of Section 501.207 of the act provides that in any action brought

State v. Beach Blvd Automotive, Inc.

139 So. 3d 380, 2014 WL 2040853, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2014 | Docket: 60241087

Cited 5 times | Published

by an act or practice in violation of the law. § 501.207(1)(a)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2011). A FDUTPA action

McKenzie v. Betts

55 So. 3d 615, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1044, 2011 WL 309318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2011 | Docket: 179748

Cited 5 times | Published

for the benefit of consumers. Under FDUTPA, section 501.207(1)(c) permits the enforcing authority to bring

Office of Atty. Gen. v. Millennium Comm. & Fulfillment, Inc.

800 So. 2d 255, 2001 WL 1190971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2001 | Docket: 2553450

Cited 5 times | Published

and Unfair Trade Practices Act ("FDUTPA"), section 501.207(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), seeking an

Storer Communications, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Legal Affairs

591 So. 2d 238, 1991 WL 138900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 1991 | Docket: 432842

Cited 5 times | Published

and d) public interest *240 However, because section 501.207(1)(b) authorizes the Department to seek injunctive

E-Racer Tech, LLC v. Office of the Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs

198 So. 3d 1107, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12821, 2016 WL 4445942

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2016 | Docket: 60256401

Cited 2 times | Published

required for a temporary injunction, since Section 501.207 authorizes the enforcing authority to seek

Bruno v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC (In re Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC)

472 B.R. 582

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 16, 2012 | Docket: 65783932

Cited 2 times | Published

550 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir.2008)). . Fla. Stats. § 501.207; § 501.211(2) & § 501.2105. . There can be no

Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Life Mgmt. Servs. of Orange Cnty., LLC

350 F. Supp. 3d 1246

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2018 | Docket: 64321920

Cited 1 times | Published

circumstances. 15 U.S.C. § 53(b) ; Fla. Stat. § 501.207(1)(b). To determine whether a permanent injunction

Taubert v. State, Office of the Attorney General

79 So. 3d 77, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20856, 2011 WL 6847811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2011 | Docket: 60305379

Cited 1 times | Published

whose behalf it is litigating a FDUTPA action. Section 501.207(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2006), authorizes

Law Office of David J. Stern, P.A. v. State

83 So. 3d 847, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19932, 2011 WL 6183590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2011 | Docket: 60306508

Cited 1 times | Published

an action for damages on behalf of consumers. § 501.207(1). The subpoena at issue in Shapiro & Fishman

George Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 2023 | Docket: 66655403

Published

Argued: Dec 16, 2022

by” a violating act or prac- tice. Id. § 501.207. Until this last remedy, the FDUTPA follows the

Jonathan E. Perlman v. PNC Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 27, 2022 | Docket: 63551200

Published

standing because he was appointed pursuant to Section 501.207(3) of the Florida Decep- tive and Unfair Trade

Office of Attorney General v. Bilotti

267 So. 3d 1

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2019 | Docket: 64708626

Published

"actual damages" to get injunctive relief under section 501.207(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2018). Background

Office of Attorney General v. Bilotti

267 So. 3d 1

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2019 | Docket: 64708625

Published

"actual damages" to get injunctive relief under section 501.207(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2018). Background

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPT. OF LEGAL AFFAIRS v. JOSEPH JAMES BILOTTI, JR.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2019 | Docket: 14560232

Published

“actual damages” to get injunctive relief under section 501.207(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2018).

Outreach Housing, LLC v. Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs

221 So. 3d 691, 2017 WL 2983990, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2017 | Docket: 6088821

Published

which were admitted into evidence pursuant to section 501.207(7), Florida Statutes (2008). Nevertheless,

Kasha v. Department of Legal Affairs

375 So. 2d 43, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15810

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1979 | Docket: 64571976

Published

finding by a hearing examiner. As required by Section 501.207, Florida Statutes (1977), the Agency conducted

State ex rel. Reno v. Barquet

358 So. 2d 230, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1978 | Docket: 64564270

Published

Affairs v. Rogers, 329 So.2d 257 (Fla.1976). “6. Section 501.207 Florida Statutes of the Act provides all remedies

Shevin v. Thuotte

339 So. 2d 253, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15662

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1976 | Docket: 64555861

Published

responsible for enforcing the little FTC act. Section 501.207, Florida Statutes (1975) authorizes him to

Lavers v. State, Department of Legal Affairs

326 So. 2d 80, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14263

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1976 | Docket: 64552209

Published

for their actual damages, as contemplated by § 501.207, F.S.1973. Before a hearing was had on the Department’s