Florida Statute 507.2 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 507
HOUSEHOLD MOVING SERVICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 507.02

507.02 Construction; intent; application.—

(1) This chapter shall be construed liberally to:

(a) Establish the law of this state governing the loading, transportation or shipment, unloading, and affiliated storage of household goods as part of household moves.

(b) Establish the law of this state governing the brokering of moves of household goods by moving brokers.

(c) Address household moving practices in this state in a manner that is not inconsistent with federal law governing consumer protection.

(2) This chapter applies to the operations of any mover or moving broker engaged in the intrastate transportation or shipment of household goods originating in this state and terminating in this state. This chapter does not apply to shipments contracted by the United States, the state, or any local government or political subdivision of the state.

(3) This chapter is intended to secure the satisfaction and confidence of shippers and members of the public when using a mover.

(4) This chapter does not supersede the authority or jurisdiction of any federal agency for goods or services regulated or controlled under other provisions of law.

History.—s. 2, ch. 2002-53; s. 4, ch. 2006-4; s. 2, ch. 2024-47.

F.S. 507.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 507.02 on CourtListener

Amendments to 507.02

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 507.02

Total Results: 6

Taylor v. State

855 So. 2d 1, 2003 WL 21283161

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2003 | Docket: 1752466

Cited 66 times | Published

see also Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 507.2 (2001 ed.). In the instant case, however, there

In The Matter Of Saybrook Manufacturing Co., Inc.

963 F.2d 1490, 27 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 277, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14489, 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 355

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 1992 | Docket: 652971

Cited 38 times | Published

within a single class. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.02 (15th ed. 1992). Cross-collateralization, however

Krispy Kreme Doughnut Company v. Cornett

312 So. 2d 771, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1975 | Docket: 1412178

Cited 16 times | Published

was allowed on the question of whether or not § 507.2 entitled "Public Parking Decks" was applicable

Boyd v. State

17 So. 3d 812, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11583, 2009 WL 2517059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2009 | Docket: 1644903

Cited 6 times | Published

see also Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 507.2 (2001 ed.). In the instant case, however, there

Shapiro v. Saybrook Manufacturing Co.

963 F.2d 1490

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 1992 | Docket: 66274303

Cited 1 times | Published

within a single class. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.02[2] (15th ed. 1992). Cross-collateralization, however

Shapiro v. Saybrook Manufacturing Co. (In re Saybrook Manufacturing Co.)

140 F.2d 1490

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 25, 1992 | Docket: 63978079

Published

within a single class. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 507.02[2] (15th ed. 1992). Cross-collateralization, however