Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 509.111 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 509.111 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 509.111 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 509.111

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 509
LODGING AND FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS; MEMBERSHIP CAMPGROUNDS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 509.111
509.111 Liability for property of guests.
(1) The operator of a public lodging establishment is not under any obligation to accept for safekeeping any moneys, securities, jewelry, or precious stones of any kind belonging to any guest, and, if such are accepted for safekeeping, the operator is not liable for the loss thereof unless such loss was the proximate result of fault or negligence of the operator. However, the liability of the operator shall be limited to $1,000 for such loss, if the public lodging establishment gave a receipt for the property (stating the value) on a form which stated, in type large enough to be clearly noticeable, that the public lodging establishment was not liable for any loss exceeding $1,000 and was only liable for that amount if the loss was the proximate result of fault or negligence of the operator.
(2) The operator of a public lodging establishment is not liable or responsible to any guest for the loss of wearing apparel, goods, or other property, except as provided in subsection (1), unless such loss occurred as the proximate result of fault or negligence of such operator, and, in case of fault or negligence, the operator is not liable for a greater sum than $500, unless the guest, prior to the loss or damage, files with the operator an inventory of the guest’s effects and the value thereof and the operator is given the opportunity to inspect such effects and check them against such inventory. The operator of a public lodging establishment is not liable or responsible to any guest for the loss of effects listed in such inventory in a total amount exceeding $1,000.
History.s. 4, ch. 1999, 1874; RS 873; GS 1231; RGS 2355; s. 11, ch. 9264, 1923; s. 1, ch. 12052, 1927; CGL 3759; s. 40, ch. 16042, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 3759; s. 1, ch. 23931, 1947; s. 2, ch. 28129, 1953; s. 6, ch. 73-325; s. 1, ch. 73-364; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 8, 39, 42, ch. 79-240; ss. 3, 4, ch. 81-161; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 11, 51, 52, ch. 90-339; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 671, ch. 97-103.
Note.Former s. 510.04.

F.S. 509.111 on Google Scholar

F.S. 509.111 on CourtListener

Amendments to 509.111


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 509.111

Total Results: 12

Elson v. State

337 So. 2d 959

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1976 | Docket: 2533778

Cited 9 times | Published

innkeeper for loss of guests' property. Fla. Stat. § 509.111, F.S.A. It is only natural that the circumstances

Garner v. Margery Lane, Inc.

242 So. 2d 776

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1970 | Docket: 1336772

Cited 7 times | Published

judgment *777 limiting defendant's liability under F.S. 509.111(1)[1], F.S.A. (popularly known as the "Innkeper's

Great American Ins. Co. v. Coppedge

405 So. 2d 732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1981 | Docket: 320780

Cited 4 times | Published

applicability of the Florida Innkeeper's Statute, Section 509.111, Florida Statutes (1979), is called into question

Fennema v. Howard Johnson Co.

559 So. 2d 1231, 1990 WL 37430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1990 | Docket: 1833201

Cited 2 times | Published

review is whether an innkeeper may rely on Section 509.111, Florida Statutes (1985), which limits an innkeeper's

Florida Sonesta Corp. v. Aniballi

463 So. 2d 1203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 1985 | Docket: 31197

Cited 2 times | Published

limitation of liability established under section 509.111, Florida Statutes (1979). Both compensatory

Safety Harbor Spa, Inc. v. High

137 So. 2d 248

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 1962 | Docket: 60200988

Cited 2 times | Published

The appellant argues that Florida Statutes, § 509.111, F.S.A., which deals with the liability of innkeepers

David v. Prime Hospitality Corp.

676 So. 2d 1049, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7072, 1996 WL 382231

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1996 | Docket: 1317914

Published

limiting respondent's liability in accord with section 509.111, Florida Statutes *1050 (1993).[1] That order

Southernmost Affiliates v. Alonzo

654 So. 2d 1066, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5625, 1995 WL 316555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1995 | Docket: 64756215

Published

because the hotel’s liability was limited under Section 509.111(2), Florida Statutes (1993), to a maximum of

Howard Johnson Co. v. Fair

575 So. 2d 723, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1600, 1991 WL 27169

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1991 | Docket: 64656857

Published

to address Howard Johnson’s contention that section 509.111(2), Florida Statutes (1985),1 limited its liability

Millman v. Howard Johnson's Co.

533 So. 2d 901, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2510, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4957, 1988 WL 120889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1988 | Docket: 64638559

Published

the verdict and judgment to $500 pursuant to section 509.111(1), Florida Statutes (1983),2 on the ground

Cole v. Carmell

112 So. 2d 278, 1959 Fla. App. LEXIS 2924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1959 | Docket: 60192543

Published

found, should be limited to $100, pursuant to § 509.111(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.1 Subsequently, the jury

Lazare Kaplan & Sons, Inc. v. Pensacola Hotel Co.

153 F. Supp. 31, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3202

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1957 | Docket: 66007414

Published

protection provided it by the Florida Statute (F.S.A. § 509.111) and thus rendering itself liable under the common-law