Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-18T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 145 So. 3d 133, 2014 WL 2755838, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9214
Snippet: .07 during this period and submitted at least 3,517.51 hours for security services never performed. The
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-05-16T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 93 So. 3d 1051, 2012 WL 1698130, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7846
Snippet: this state unless the security is exempt under s. 517.051, is sold in a transaction exempt under s. 517.061
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-03-12T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 845 So. 2d 904
Snippet: this state unless the security is exempt under s. 517.051, is sold in a transaction exempt under s. 517.061
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-06-13T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 822 So. 2d 1252
Snippet: they were exempt from registration under section 517.051(8) or section 517.061(11)(a), Florida Statutes
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-02-18T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 710 So. 2d 984, 1998 WL 63547
Snippet: Hodges, O'Hara & Russell Co., 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550, 554 (1910), the supreme court cited the
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1996-07-03T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 678 So. 2d 834
Snippet: #39;Hara & Russell Co., supra [59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550]; Citizens' State Bank v. Jones [100
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-05-31T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 655 So. 2d 221, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5777, 1995 WL 323061
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s. 517.051 and including any security sold in a transaction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-01-18T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 630 So. 2d 1199
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s. 517.051 and including any security sold in a transaction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-05-02T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 570 So. 2d 1315, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3002, 1990 WL 57434
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s. 517.051 and including any security sold in a transaction
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1989-01-04T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 537 So. 2d 978
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s. 517.051 and including any security sold in any transaction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-01-20T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 500 So. 2d 1374, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 289, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6346
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s.517.051 and including any security sold in any transaction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-04-15T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 488 So. 2d 843
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s. 517.051 and including any security sold in any transaction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-08-29T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 456 So. 2d 1197
Snippet: v. Hodges, O'Hara and Russell Co., 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550 (1910) and Potakar v. Hurtak, 82 So.2d
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-05-25T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 452 So. 2d 88, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13372
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s. 517.051 and including any security sold in any transaction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-01-24T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 426 So. 2d 1055
Snippet: any security exempted under the provisions of s. 517.051 and including any security sold in any transaction
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-08-04T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 417 So. 2d 1077
Snippet: Hodges, O'Hara & Russell Co., 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550 (1910). As we see it, the four-year statute
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-07-01T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 384 So. 2d 1341
Snippet: O'Hara & Russell Company, 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550 (1910), especially where coupled with a
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1977-04-05T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 344 So. 2d 604
Snippet: v. Hodges, O'Hara and Russell Co., 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550 (1910); Robson Link and Co. v. Leedy Wheeler
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1973-06-20T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 279 So. 2d 386
Snippet: Hodges, O'Hara & Russell Co., 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550 (1910). On the other hand, where one is
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-07-31T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 212 So. 2d 906
Snippet: ;. In Hirschman v. Hodges, etc., 1910, 59 Fla. 517, 51 So. 550, it was said that "* * * what is