The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS

Chapter 520
RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 520.26

520.26 Exemptions.—The provisions of this part do not apply to the following:

(1) A person or company, acting through its officers, employees, brokers, or agents, that markets, sells, solicits, negotiates, or enters into an agreement for the sale or financing of a distributed energy generation system as part of a transaction involving the sale or transfer of the real property on which the system is or will be affixed.

(2) A transaction involving the sale or transfer of the real property on which a distributed energy generation system is located.

(3) A third party, including a local government, that enters into an agreement for the financing of a distributed energy generation system.

(4) The sale or lease of a distributed energy generation system that will be installed on nonresidential real property.

(5) The sale of a distributed energy generation system pursuant to an agreement that requires full payment of the system from the buyer to the seller no later than the date the system is installed by the seller or is delivered from the seller to the buyer or a third party for installation.

(6) A person, other than the seller or lessor, who installs a distributed energy generation system on residential property.

History.—s. 5, ch. 2017-118.

F.S. 520.26 on Google Scholar

F.S. 520.26 on Casetext

Amendments to 520.26

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 520.26

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 520.26.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In LMS HOLDING COMPANY, EIN EIN EIN, 149 B.R. 684 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1993)

. . . the Mako Plan listed the following claim: “United States of America, Internal Revenue Service_ $330,-520.26 . . .

S. NADIAK, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 356 F.2d 911 (2d Cir. 1966)

. . . Petitioner paid the attorney $520.26 for his services and deducted this sum on his 1959 return. . . .

L. MALONEY, v. UNITED STATES, 246 F. Supp. 694 (D. Haw. 1965)

. . . which modern American cars are built, believes that the amount of the admitted damage to the car, $520.26 . . . medical expenses to date were $403.45, and that he incurred reasonable automobile repair expenses of $520.26 . . .

C. v., 35 B.T.A. 617 (B.T.A. 1937)

. . . The petitioner received $520.26 in 1929 and $332.78 in 1930 from Northampton County to reimburse him . . .

MOREDOCK v. MOREDOCK, 179 F. 163 (C.C.W.D. Pa. 1910)

. . . Reynolds, $30.35, by James Moredock, $389.57, and the amount paid by your respondent was $520.26, aggregating . . .