Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 527.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 527.04 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 527.04

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 527
SALE OF LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 527.04
527.04 Proof of insurance required.
(1) Before any license is issued, except to a category IV dealer in appliances and equipment or a category III liquefied petroleum gas cylinder exchange operator, the applicant must deliver to the department satisfactory evidence that the applicant is covered by a primary policy of bodily injury liability and property damage liability insurance that covers the products and operations with respect to such business and is issued by an insurer authorized to do business in this state for an amount not less than $1 million and that the premium on such insurance is paid. An insurance certificate, affidavit, or other satisfactory evidence of acceptable insurance coverage shall be accepted as proof of insurance. In lieu of an insurance policy, the applicant may deliver a good and sufficient bond in the amount of $1 million, payable to the Commissioner of Agriculture, with the applicant as principal and a surety company authorized to do business in this state as surety. The bond must be conditioned upon the applicant’s compliance with this chapter and the rules of the department with respect to the conduct of such business and shall indemnify and hold harmless all persons from loss or damage by reason of the applicant’s failure to comply. However, the aggregated liability of the surety may not exceed $1 million. If the insurance policy is canceled or otherwise terminated or the bond becomes insufficient, the department may require new proof of insurance or a new bond to be filed, and if the licenseholder fails to comply, the department shall cancel the license issued and give the licenseholder written notice that it is unlawful to engage in business without a license. A new bond is not required as long as the original bond remains sufficient and in force. If the licenseholder’s insurance coverage as required by this subsection is canceled or otherwise terminated, the insurer must notify the department within 30 days after the cancellation or termination.
(2) Before any license is issued to a category III liquefied petroleum gas cylinder exchange operator, the applicant must deliver to the department satisfactory evidence that the applicant is covered by a primary policy of bodily injury liability and property damage liability insurance that covers the products and operations with respect to the business and is issued by an insurer authorized to do business in this state for an amount not less than $300,000 and that the premium on the insurance is paid. An insurance certificate, affidavit, or other satisfactory evidence of acceptable insurance coverage shall be accepted as proof of insurance. In lieu of an insurance policy, the applicant may deliver a good and sufficient bond in the amount of $300,000, payable to the Commissioner of Agriculture, with the applicant as principal and a surety company authorized to do business in this state as surety. The bond must be conditioned upon the applicant’s compliance with this chapter and the rules of the department with respect to the conduct of such business and must indemnify and hold harmless all persons from loss or damage by reason of the applicant’s failure to comply. However, the aggregated liability of the surety may not exceed $300,000. If the insurance policy is canceled or otherwise terminated or the bond becomes insufficient, the department may require new proof of insurance or a new bond to be filed, and if the licenseholder fails to comply, the department shall cancel the license issued and give the licenseholder written notice that it is unlawful to engage in business without a license. A new bond is not required as long as the original bond remains sufficient and in force. If the licenseholder’s insurance coverage required by this subsection is canceled or otherwise terminated, the insurer must notify the department within 30 days after the cancellation or termination.
(3) Any person having a cause of action on the bond may bring suit against the principal and surety, and a copy of such bond duly certified by the department shall be received in evidence in the courts of this state without further proof. The department shall furnish a certified copy of the bond upon payment to it of its lawful fee for making and certifying such copy.
History.ss. 3, 4, ch. 24302, 1947; s. 1, ch. 25105, 1949; s. 11, ch. 25035, 1949; s. 1, ch. 29667, 1955; s. 1, ch. 61-158; ss. 13, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 3, ch. 76-168; s. 1, ch. 77-457; ss. 3, 18, 19, ch. 81-175; ss. 2, 3, ch. 81-318; ss. 1, 2, ch. 82-6; s. 125, ch. 83-218; s. 3, ch. 84-126; ss. 2, 3, ch. 87-34; s. 5, ch. 90-215; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 724, ch. 97-103; s. 3, ch. 2000-269; s. 8, ch. 2007-232; s. 23, ch. 2018-84.
Note.Former ss. 526.14, 527.05.

F.S. 527.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 527.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 527.04


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 527.04
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 527.04.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 527.04

Total Results: 9

Agency for Health Care v. Assoc. Indus.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-06-27

Citation: 678 So. 2d 1239

Snippet: government,' Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 527 [4 S.Ct. 111, 117, 28 L.Ed. 232] (1884)." Daniels

Bizzigotti v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-03-15

Citation: 410 So. 2d 1360

Snippet: Nelson v. Los Angeles County, 362 U.S. 1, 80 S.Ct. 527, 4 L.Ed.2d 494 (1960), in opposition to appellant's

Baum v. Coronado Condominium Ass'n, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-11-13

Citation: 376 So. 2d 914

Snippet: 822 (1940); Palm Corporation v. Walters, 148 So. 527, 4 So.2d 696, 699 (1941); Jones v. Trawick, 75 So

Switzer v. Dye

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-07-29

Citation: 177 So. 2d 539

Snippet: Newby v. West Palm Beach Water Co., Fla., 47 So.2d 527. [4] Fla.App., 105 So.2d 594.

Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union Local No. 339 v. Creighton's Restaurant Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-10-07

Citation: 115 So. 2d 30, 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2225

Snippet: conjecture. Palm Corporation v. Walters, 148 Fla. 527, 4 So.2d 696; Henderson v. Coleman, 150 Fla. 185,

Pizio v. Babcock

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-12-21

Citation: 76 So. 2d 654

Snippet: category. Palm Corporation v. Walters, 148 Fla. 527, 4 So.2d 696. Injunctive orders like this should be

Moore v. City Dry Cleaners Laundry

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1949-07-26

Citation: 41 So. 2d 865, 24 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2373, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 883

Snippet: conjecture. Palm Corporation v. Walters,148 Fla. 527, 4 So.2d 696; Henderson v. Coleman, 150 Fla. 185,

Seaboard Rendering Co. v. Conlon

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1943-04-09

Citation: 12 So. 2d 882, 152 Fla. 723, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 1017

Snippet: Court in Palm Corporation v. Walters, 148 Fla. 527, 4 So.2d 696, 699. It is difficult to see, however

Henderson v. Coleman

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1942-03-26

Citation: 7 So. 2d 117, 150 Fla. 185, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 954

Snippet: of Palm Corporation v. Walters, et al., 148 Fla. 527,4 So.2d 696, we said: "Appellant's final contention