Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 538.32 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 538.32 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 538.32

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXIII
REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE, INVESTMENTS, AND SOLICITATIONS
Chapter 538
SECONDHAND DEALERS AND SECONDARY METALS RECYCLERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 538.32
538.32 Registration, transaction, and recordkeeping requirements; penalties.
(1) A mail-in secondhand precious metals dealer may not conduct business under this part without registering with the department and complying with all registration regulations as set forth in s. 538.09.
(2) A mail-in secondhand precious metals dealer may not remit payment to a seller unless the seller has provided the following information:
(a) The seller’s name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address, if available.
(b) The seller’s driver license number and issuing state or other government-issued identification number.
(c) A sworn statement made by the seller that the seller is of lawful age and that the driver license number or other government-issued identification number and other identifying information provided by the seller is true and correct and that the seller is the lawful owner of the goods with absolute authority to sell the goods. The statement must include the following language: “I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.”
(3) For every transaction, the secondhand dealer must keep a record of the following:
(a) A complete and accurate description of the seller’s goods, including:
1. Precious metal type, or, if jewelry, the type of jewelry.
2. Any other unique identifying marks, numbers, or letters. The description must be in an electronic format agreed upon by the dealer and the appropriate law enforcement agency.
(b) The date that the seller’s goods were received by the mail-in secondhand precious metals dealer.

This information must be provided to the appropriate law enforcement agency within 24 hours after entering into the contract unless other arrangements are made between the business and the law enforcement agency.

(4) For every transaction, pictures of the secondhand goods which are the subject of the transaction must be available online for electronic viewing, via a website accessible by username and password only, by a law enforcement agency at no charge. In addition, the electronic files must be searchable by a law enforcement agency for queries concerning property descriptions, secondhand dealer transaction information, and the seller’s personal identification, including address, state of residence, and zip code.
(5) The mail-in secondhand precious metals dealer must maintain, for a period of not less than 2 years, all information under subsections (2) and (3) and all records of any transaction between the dealer and seller in a form that is easily retrievable upon request by a law enforcement agency.
(6) The mail-in secondhand precious metals dealer must provide the appropriate law enforcement agency with an electronic copy of the name, address, phone number, driver license number, or government-issued identification number, and issuing state of the person from whom the dealer purchased or acquired the precious metals or jewelry.
(7)(a) If the seller fails to provide the information required under paragraphs (2)(a) and (b), the secondhand dealer may verify the identity and information of the seller through a national provider of personal identification verification services. Evidence from the personal identification verification service must be maintained by the secondhand dealer and available for review by a law enforcement agency upon request.
(b) Alternatively, a secondhand dealer must give written notice to the seller, by United States mail or e-mail if an e-mail address is provided by the seller, that information otherwise required to be given by the seller under subsection (2) has not been provided by the seller to the secondhand dealer. Notice of the deficient information must be sent by the secondhand dealer no later than 10 days after the transaction is received by the secondhand dealer. The secondhand dealer must specify in the notice that:
1. The seller must provide the missing information or must request the return of the property from the secondhand dealer within 30 days after receiving the notice from the secondhand dealer; and
2. The failure of the seller to provide the missing information or request return of the property within the applicable 30-day time period shall result in abandonment of the seller’s property to the Division of Unclaimed Property of the Department of Financial Services pursuant to chapter 717.
(c) If the seller fails to remedy the deficiency in information or request return of the property within 30 days after receiving the notice, the seller’s property is deemed abandoned and is relinquished to the Division of Unclaimed Property pursuant to chapter 717 if the property’s true market value is greater than $50 as defined in chapter 717.
(d) Within 24 hours after the expiration of the 30-day hold period for the property, the secondhand dealer must notify the appropriate law enforcement agency of the abandonment of the property by electronic transmission or by sending a copy of the completed form authorized by chapter 717 to the Department of Financial Services, Division of Unclaimed Property.
(8)(a) If there is probable cause that goods held by a secondhand dealer are stolen, the law enforcement agency with jurisdiction over the secondhand dealer may place a 90-day written hold order on the goods and may take possession of the goods from the dealer during the 90-day hold period. The 90-day hold period may be extended beyond 90 days by a court of competent jurisdiction upon a finding of probable cause that the property is stolen and further holding is necessary for the purpose of trial or to safeguard the property.
(b) If the secondhand dealer maintains possession of the goods during any hold period, the secondhand dealer assumes all responsibility, civil and criminal, for the safekeeping of the property or evidence in question, including responsibility for the actions of any employee of the dealer.
(c) While a hold order is in effect, the secondhand dealer must, if in possession of the goods, release the property subject to the hold order to the custody of a law enforcement agency for use in a criminal investigation. Release of the property to the law enforcement agency is not considered a waiver or release of the secondhand dealer’s rights or interest in the property unless the secondhand dealer is not owed restitution for the property.
(d) The property must be returned to the secondhand dealer upon completion of the criminal proceeding unless the court orders an alternative disposition or the secondhand dealer is not due restitution for the property. When another disposition is ordered, the court shall additionally order the person from whom the secondhand dealer acquired the property to pay restitution to the secondhand dealer in the amount that the secondhand dealer paid for the property together with reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
(9)(a) If a secondhand dealer contests the identification or ownership of the property, the person alleging ownership of the property may, if a timely report of the theft of the goods was made to the proper authorities, bring an action for replevin in the county or circuit court by petition in substantially the following form:

Plaintiff A. B. sues defendant C. D., and alleges:

1. This is an action to recover possession of personal property in    County, Florida.

2. The description of the property is:   (list property)  . To the best of plaintiff’s knowledge, information, and belief, the value of the property is $  .

3. Plaintiff is entitled to the possession of the property under a security agreement dated   ,   (year)  , a copy of which is attached.

4. To plaintiff’s best knowledge, information, and belief, the property is located at   .

5. The property is wrongfully detained by defendant. Defendant came into possession of the property by   (describe method of possession)  . To plaintiff’s best knowledge, information, and belief, defendant detains the property because   (give reasons)  .

6. The property has not been taken under an execution or attachment against plaintiff’s property.

(b) The filing fees shall be waived by the clerk of the court and the service fees shall be waived by the sheriff. The court shall award the prevailing party attorney’s fees and costs. In addition, if the filing party prevails in the replevin action, the court shall order payment of filing fees to the clerk and service fees to the sheriff.
(c) Upon the filing of the petition, the court shall set a hearing to be held at the earliest possible time. Upon receipt of a petition for a writ by a secondhand dealer, the dealer shall hold the property at issue until the court determines the respective interests of the parties.
(d) In addition to the civil petition for return remedy, the state may file a motion as part of a pending criminal case related to the property. The criminal court has jurisdiction to determine ownership, to order return or other disposition of the property, and to order any appropriate restitution to any person. The order must be entered upon hearing after proper notice has been given to the secondhand dealer, the victim, and the defendant in the criminal case.
History.s. 2, ch. 2009-158; s. 3, ch. 2009-162; s. 39, ch. 2016-165.

F.S. 538.32 on Google Scholar

F.S. 538.32 on Casetext

Amendments to 538.32


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 538.32
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 538.32.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 538.32

Total Results: 14

White v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-07-12

Citation: 964 So. 2d 1278, 2007 WL 2002574

Snippet: this evidence. See Rogers v. State, 957 So.2d 538, 32 Fla. L. Weekly S263, S265 (Fla. Jan. 18, 2007)

Como Oil Co., Inc. v. O'LOUGHLIN

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-02-21

Citation: 466 So. 2d 1061, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 130, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 1458

Snippet: Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321 (1947). This Court appeared to have recognized

Collins v. Keymo Cars, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-05-10

Citation: 198 So. 2d 836, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4799

Snippet: Top Cab & Baggage Co., etc. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321 (1947). Accordingly, the orders granting

Arnold Owens, Inc. v. Balido

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1965-05-11

Citation: 175 So. 2d 96, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4164

Snippet: Use and Benefit of Fontaine v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321; Bowden v. Carter, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d

Casey v. Florida Power Corporation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-09-13

Citation: 157 So. 2d 168

Snippet: Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321. "4. The Court carefully enumerated the

Gregg v. State Road Department

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-02-01

Citation: 140 So. 2d 328

Snippet: Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321 (1947). Since our thus striking their

Geller v. 2500 Collins Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-05-08

Citation: 130 So. 2d 322, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2768

Snippet: Use and Benefit of Fontaine v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So. 2d 321. Where the trial court grants a new

Martin v. Thompson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-12-01

Citation: 124 So. 2d 744

Snippet: Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321; Propper v. Kesner, Fla.1958, 104 So

Kramer v. Landau

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-06-30

Citation: 113 So. 2d 756

Snippet: Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321; Vaughn v. Smith, Fla. 1957, 96 So.2d

Myers v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-05-13

Citation: 112 So. 2d 263

Snippet: Benefit of Fontaine v. Dorner, 1947, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321; Teare v. Local Union No. 295, Fla. 1957

Vaughn v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1957-04-10

Citation: 96 So. 2d 143

Snippet: Red Top Cab & Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321. The very nature of the pleading in court

Redditt v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1955-12-14

Citation: 84 So. 2d 317

Snippet: Use and Benefit of Fontaine v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321; Star Fruit Co. v. Eagle Lake Growers

Bowers v. Roddy

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1949-01-28

Citation: 38 So. 2d 461, 1949 Fla. LEXIS 1234

Snippet: 438; Red Top Cab Baggage Co. v. Dorner, 159 Fla. 538, 32 So.2d 321; State ex rel. Lynch v. Danner, 159 Fla

Burnham v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1896-01-15

Citation: 37 Fla. 327

Snippet: of its respects is People vs. Stark, 136 N. Y. 538, 32 N. E. Rep. 1046. *331The judgment is reversed,