Florida Statute 570.88 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 570
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 570.88

570.88 Liability.—

(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), an agritourism operator, his or her employer or employee, or the owner of the underlying land on which the agritourism occurs is not liable for injury or death of, or damage or loss to, a participant resulting from the inherent risks of agritourism activities if the notice of risk required under s. 570.89 is posted as required. Except as provided in subsection (2), a participant, or a participant’s representative, may not maintain an action against or recover from an agritourism operator, his or her employer or employee, or the owner of the underlying land on which the agritourism occurs for the injury or death of, or damage or loss to, an agritourism participant resulting exclusively from any of the inherent risks of agritourism activities.

(2) In the event of the injury or death of, or damage or loss to, an agritourism participant, subsection (1) does not prevent or limit the liability of an agritourism operator or his or her employer or employee or the owner of the underlying land on which the agritourism occurs if he or she:

(a) Commits an act or omission that constitutes gross negligence or willful or wanton disregard for the safety of the participant, and that act or omission proximately causes injury, damage, or death to the participant; or

(b) Intentionally injures the participant.

(3) The limitation on legal liability afforded by this section to an agritourism operator or his or her employer or employee or the owner of the underlying land on which the agritourism occurs is in addition to any limitations of legal liability otherwise provided by law.

History.—s. 3, ch. 2013-179; s. 114, ch. 2014-150.

Note.—Former s. 570.963.

F.S. 570.88 on Google Scholar

F.S. 570.88 on Casetext

Amendments to 570.88

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 570.88

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 570.88.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 570.88

Total Results: 20

Allende v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-09-17

Citation: 882 So. 2d 472, 2004 WL 2070943

Snippet: 1979)); see United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968). As a consequence

Wilson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-10

Citation: 845 So. 2d 142, 2003 WL 1832631

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968)." City of Daytona

Prado v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-08

Citation: 816 So. 2d 1155, 2002 WL 876457

Snippet: *1158 See United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968); see also Gillman

K.N.M. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-09-21

Citation: 793 So. 2d 1195, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13294

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968).” City of Daytona

KNM v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-09-21

Citation: 793 So. 2d 1195, 2001 WL 1103275

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968)." City of Daytona

State v. Gitto

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-04-30

Citation: 731 So. 2d 686, 1998 WL 335787

Snippet: 1985) (quoting United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968)), was more emphatic:

Huerta v. Hillsborough County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-23

Citation: 720 So. 2d 276, 1998 WL 736313

Snippet: are critical in tone. See Pickering, 391 U.S. at 570, 88 S.Ct. 1731. However, recognizing that the employer

Santana v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-08-07

Citation: 677 So. 2d 1339, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8230, 1996 WL 441560

Snippet: jury trial. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968); A.S. v. State

A.S. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-14

Citation: 667 So. 2d 994, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1028

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968).” City of Daytona

As v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-02-14

Citation: 667 So. 2d 994, 1996 WL 60824

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968)." City of Daytona

Beauvais v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-10-01

Citation: 475 So. 2d 1342, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2279

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968); Gillman v. State

City of Daytona Beach v. Del Percio

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-08-30

Citation: 476 So. 2d 197, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 458

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968)." Gillman v.

Frazier v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-04-16

Citation: 467 So. 2d 447, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 997

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (a statute, violation

Webb v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-05

Citation: 454 So. 2d 616, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13824

Snippet: resentenc-ing. See United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968); R.A.B. v. State

Morris v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-06-05

Citation: 456 So. 2d 471

Snippet: unconstitutional. See United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (a statute, violation

Peri v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-01-18

Citation: 426 So. 2d 1021, 39 A.L.R. 4th 454

Snippet: absence. See United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968); Singer v. United

Fraley v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-01-04

Citation: 426 So. 2d 983

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968) (a statute, violation

Gillman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-07-06

Citation: 373 So. 2d 935

Snippet: unconstitutional. United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968). An accused cannot

Slater v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-06-25

Citation: 316 So. 2d 539

Snippet: NOTES [1] See United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed.2d 138 (1968). [2] State v

Chester v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1974-06-26

Citation: 298 So. 2d 529

Snippet: law. Compare United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S.Ct. 1209, 20 L.Ed. 138, 147. Furthermore, the