Florida Statute 573.108 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 573
MARKETING OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 573.108

573.108 Findings required to issue marketing order.—After notice and hearing, the department shall issue a marketing order if it finds and sets forth that the order will tend to accomplish the objectives and purposes of ss. 573.101-573.124, and:

(1) The provisions are necessary in order to effect a reasonable correlation of the supply of agricultural commodities affected with market demands therefor and the marketing order or amendments thereto will tend to reestablish or maintain a level of prices for agricultural commodities which will provide a purchasing power for the commodities adequate to maintain sufficient producers as are required to provide such supply of the quantities and qualities of agricultural commodities necessary to fulfill the normal requirements of consumers.

(2) The marketing order or amendments thereto will tend to approach equality of purchasing power at as rapid a rate as is feasible in view of the market demand for agricultural commodities.

(3) The marketing order or amendments thereto are in conformity with the provisions of ss. 573.101-573.124 and will tend to effectuate the declared purposes and policies of ss. 573.101-573.124.

(4) The marketing order or amendments thereto will protect the interests of consumers of agricultural commodities by exercising the powers of ss. 573.101-573.124 only to the extent necessary to establish the equality of purchasing power described in subsection (1).

(5) Provided that no marketing order would be issued wherein the commodity addressed is subject to regulation by any other state agency unless a memorandum of agreement is executed between the department and the regulating agency.

History.—ss. 8, 26, ch. 87-171; s. 4, ch. 91-429.

F.S. 573.108 on Google Scholar

F.S. 573.108 on Casetext

Amendments to 573.108

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 573.108

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 573.108.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 573.108

Total Results: 11

FEH, JR. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-02-24

Citation: 28 So. 3d 213, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2101, 2010 WL 624193

Snippet: see also Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988) (where Supreme

G.M. v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-10-08

Citation: 19 So. 3d 973, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 568, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1711

Snippet: See, e.g., Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988). . Although

GM v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-10-08

Citation: 19 So. 3d 973, 2009 WL 3199713

Snippet: See, e.g., Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988). [5] Although

Summerall v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-01-12

Citation: 777 So. 2d 1060, 2001 WL 27885

Snippet: leave." Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988). In this case

O.A. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-09

Citation: 754 So. 2d 717, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15529

Snippet: language from Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988), and other

OA v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-09

Citation: 754 So. 2d 717, 1998 WL 870857

Snippet: language from Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988), and other

Cooper v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-04-25

Citation: 654 So. 2d 229, 1995 WL 236795

Snippet: leave." Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 1979, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988). Appellant's

Perez v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-06-24

Citation: 620 So. 2d 1256, 1993 WL 219861

Snippet: free to leave."). Accord Chesternut, 486 U.S. at 573, 108 S.Ct. at 1979; I.N.S. v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210

Clayton v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-04-14

Citation: 616 So. 2d 615

Snippet: (1991); Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 1979, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988). The

Riechmann v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-05-30

Citation: 581 So. 2d 133, 1991 WL 88737

Snippet: See, e.g., Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. 567, 573, 108 S.Ct. 1975, 1979, 100 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988); Berkemer

Baldwin v. Baldwin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1944-06-23

Citation: 18 So. 2d 681, 154 Fla. 624, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 772

Snippet: In this connection see Bell v. Bell, 214 Ala. 573,108 So. 375; Kiddle v. Kiddle, 90 Neb. 248, 133 N.W