Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 588.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 588.01 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 588.01

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 588
LEGAL FENCES AND LIVESTOCK AT LARGE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 588.01
588.01 Requirements of general fence.All fences or enclosures of land shall be substantially constructed, whether with rails, logs, post and railing, iron, steel, or other material, and not less than 5 feet high; to the extent of 2 feet from the ground there shall not be a space between the material used in the construction of any fence greater than 4 inches; provided, that when any fence or enclosure shall be made with a trench or a ditch, the same shall be 4 feet wide; and in that case the fence shall be 5 feet high from the bottom of the ditch to the top of the fence.
History.RS 875; s. 1, ch. 5038, 1901; GS 1233; RGS 2364; CGL 3773.

F.S. 588.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 588.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 588.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 588.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 588.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 588.01

Total Results: 20

Oceanside Plaza Condominium Assoc., Inc. v. Foam King Industries, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 206 So. 3d 785, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16667

Snippet: also, Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562, 562-63 (1941) (“By the filing of this

Lucky v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-01-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 25 So. 3d 691, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 293, 2010 WL 174150

Snippet: ." The victim testified that he paid $1,588 for one of the computers, $320 for the scanner, and that

Steelcase, Inc. v. Office Interiors of Florida, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2007-01-31T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 955 So. 2d 24, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 1030, 2007 WL 258265

Snippet: see also Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562 (1941); Rice v. Clement, 184 So.2d 678

Ingram v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-04-27T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 928 So. 2d 423

Snippet: ; see Devenpeck, 543 U.S. at 153-54, 125 S.Ct. 588. One of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement

Florida Board of Education v. Andrews

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2005-06-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 903 So. 2d 1048, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9361, 2005 WL 1412198

Snippet: defendant’s alleged failure to comply with section 588.01, Florida Statutes, could be considered as evidence…stating that the fencing requirements in sections 588.01 through 588.11 “have nothing to do with the remaining

Ranieri v. Paincare Holdings, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-11-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 889 So. 2d 106, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17811, 2004 WL 2623950

Snippet: See also Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562, 563 (1941). Further, it is not the province

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2003-10-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 858 So. 2d 1013, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 797, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1779, 2003 WL 22410375

Snippet: doctrine of Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562 (1941). 2003 Amendment. Subdivision (

Vereen v. Alpha Realty & Associates, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-04-25T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 846 So. 2d 1161, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5818, 2003 WL 1936138

Snippet: ) (citing Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562, 562-563 (1941) (filing amended complaint

Barnes v. Horan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-11-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 841 So. 2d 472

Snippet: pleading. See Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562, 563 (1941)(By the filing of this declaration

Hanson v. Scharber

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-01-18T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 749 So. 2d 563

Snippet: sustained by any person by reason thereof. Sections 588.01 and 588.011 define the requirements of "general

In Re Amendments to Fla. Rules Civ. Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-07-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 604 So. 2d 1110

Snippet: doctrine of Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562 (1941). RULE 1.200. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE

Arthur v. Hillsborough County Bd. of Criminal Justice

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-05-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 588 So. 2d 236

Snippet: court. See Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562 (1941). It is a long established rule

Zuppardo v. O'Hare

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-03-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 487 So. 2d 39, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 660, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6865

Snippet: had “violated the requirements of Florida Statute 588.01, 588.11 and 588.-14....” The facts either proffered…438 So.2d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) that sections 588.-01 through 588.11, pertaining to “legal fence” and…chapter 25236, Laws of Florida (1949). Sections 588.01 through 588.11 were enacted to protect landowners

Florida Bar

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-10-09T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 391 So. 2d 165, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4428

Snippet: doctrine of Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562 (1941). RULE 1.210 PARTIES Subdivisions

Steele v. Lannon

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1978-03-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 355 So. 2d 190

Snippet: record. E.g., Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562 (1941). [2] Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(d) requires

Rockow v. Hendry

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-01-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 230 So. 2d 717, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7049

Snippet: into § 588.03, F.S., now repealed, and F.S. §§ 588.01, 588.07 and 588.08 F.S.A.) and other statutes referred

Collins v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-10-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 203 So. 2d 28, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4396

Snippet: cause, as reported in 197 So. 2d beginning at page 588,1 dissent from this majority opinion of reversal but

Bergovoy v. Atlantic Electric, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-05-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 140 So. 2d 885, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3221

Snippet: 16; Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 1941, 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562; Watkins v. Sims, 1921, 81 Fla. 730,

Babb v. Lincoln Auto Finance Co.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-10-08T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 133 So. 2d 566

Snippet: So. 764; Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562; Shannon v. McBride, Fla.App. 1958, 105

Shannon v. McBride

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-06-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 105 So. 2d 16

Snippet: So. 764; Dee v. Southern Brewing Co., 146 Fla. 588, 1 So.2d 562; 41 Am.Jur., Pleading, Sec. 313; 6 Cyclopedia