Florida Statute 589.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 589
FORESTRY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 589.02

589.02 Headquarters and meetings of council.—The official headquarters of the council shall be in Tallahassee, but it may hold meetings at such other places in the state as it may determine by resolutions or as may be selected by a majority of the members of the council in any call for a meeting. The council shall annually elect from its members a chair, a vice chair, and a secretary. A majority of the members of the council shall constitute a quorum for such purposes.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 12283, 1927; CGL 4151(1),(2); ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 4, ch. 78-323; ss. 2, 4, 5, ch. 81-80; s. 1, ch. 82-46; s. 2, ch. 83-265; ss. 1, 2, ch. 87-10; s. 5, ch. 91-429; s. 949, ch. 97-103; s. 20, ch. 2013-226.

F.S. 589.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 589.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 589.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 589.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 589.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 589.02

Total Results: 9

STEPHEN OLENCHAK v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-11-18

Snippet: harmless and warranted a new trial. 261 So. 3d at 589. 2 In assessing prejudice under Strickland

In re Amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification & Regulation of Court Interpreters

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-03-27

Citation: 136 So. 3d 584, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 169, 2014 WL 1246079, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1031

Snippet: justice, as follows: (1) two county court judges; *589(2) three circuit court judges; (3) three trial court

Garrett v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-03-28

Citation: 978 So. 2d 214, 2008 WL 817911

Snippet: fundamental error as seen in Gryphon, 847 So.2d 589,[2] and similar cases.[3] The jury was also instructed

Barfield v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-05-04

Citation: 396 So. 2d 793

Snippet: warrant should issue." 393 U.S. at 417, 89 S.Ct. at 589. [2] This outline is reproduced from Moylan, Hearsay

Wilson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-11-28

Citation: 377 So. 2d 237

Snippet: denied, 429 U.S. 980, 97 S.Ct. 493, 50 L.Ed.2d 589. [2] The conversations were drug related; however

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-07-22

Snippet: fires. Lester v. City of St. Petersburg, 183 So.2d 589 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966), appeal dismissed, 190 So.2d

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1974-02-20

Snippet: 605; Lester v. City of St. Petersburg, 183 So.2d 589 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1966), appeal dismissed, 190 So.2d

Jones v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-11-29

Citation: 192 So. 2d 285

Snippet: 284, and Jalbert v. State, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 589. [2] The necessity for the state to prove the minimal

J. C. Vereen & Sons, Inc. v. Houser

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-03-31

Citation: 167 So. 45, 123 Fla. 641, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1025

Snippet: acquiescence of the same. Steele v. Sullivan, 70 Ala. 589; 2 Wait. Act Def. 693. One circumstance always considered