The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 601.25

601.25 Determination of soluble solids and acid.—The department shall adopt rules determining the method by which juice is tested for percentage of total soluble solids, the method by which juice is tested for acidity, and the method for testing fruit for juice content. Until the department determines such method by rule, the Brix hydrometer shall be used and the reading of the hydrometer corrected for temperature shall be considered as the percent of the total soluble solids, and anhydrous citric acid shall be determined by titration of the juice using standard alkali and phenolphthalein as indicator, the total acidity being calculated as anhydrous citric acid.

History.—s. 25, ch. 25149, 1949; s. 1, ch. 61-68; s. 22, ch. 71-186; s. 22, ch. 2012-182.

F.S. 601.25 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.25 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.25

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.25

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.25.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

REMPFER, U. S. v. M. SHARFSTEIN, MD,, 583 F.3d 860 (D.C. Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 601.25). . . . See 21 C.F.R. § 601.25(a), (e). . . . See id. § 601.25(f). After receiving and reviewing comments, the FDA publishes a final order. . . . . § 601.25(g). . . . function in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man.” 21 C.F.R. § 601.25 . . .

L. REMPFER, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS,, 538 F. Supp. 2d 200 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . . § 601.25. . . .

REMPFER, v. C. VON ESCHENBACH,, 535 F. Supp. 2d 99 (D.D.C. 2008)

. . . . § 601.25(d). . . . . § 601.25(d)(2). . . . Id. § 601.25(a) & (e). . . . Id. § 601.25(f). . . . Id. § 601.25(g) &G). . . . .

UNITED STATES, v. J. KISALA, U. S., 64 M.J. 50 (C.A.A.F. 2006)

. . . According to 21 C.F.R. 601.25, the panel was: “(1) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of biological . . . As required by 21 C.F.R. § 601.25, the proposed rule required public comment, and the FDA received four . . . Anthrax Vaccine (Dec. 30, 2003). . 21 C.F.R. § 601.4 (2004); 21 C.F.R. § 601.4 (1977). . 21 C.F.R. § 601.25 . . . Id. § 601.25(a), (b). . Id. § 601.25(a). . . . .

DOE v. H. RUMSFELD,, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004)

. . . . § 601.25. . . . See 21 C.F.R. § 601.25(a). Each panel must submit a report. See § 601.25(e). . . . .” § 601.25(e)(1). . . . See §§ 601.25(g), 601.25®. C. . . . . § 601.25(f). . . .

BLACKMON, v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION,, 328 F. Supp. 2d 659 (S.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . . §§ 601.2, 601.12, 601.25). . . .

DOE v. H. RUMSFELD,, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003)

. . . . § 601.25. . . .

A. TUCKER, v. STATE, 832 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . First, Tucker argues that the trial court erred in imposing $601.25 in costs of prosecution because the . . .

EVANS PACKING COMPANY, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES,, 550 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Section 601.25 states: The Department of Citrus by rule or regulation shall determine the method by which . . .

L. HURLEY, Jr. v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., 863 F.2d 1173 (5th Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 601.2, 601.12, 601.25. . . .

L. HURLEY, Jr. v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., 851 F.2d 1536 (5th Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 601.2, 601.12, 601.25. . . .

JONES, JONES, v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., 695 F. Supp. 700 (E.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . . § 601.25(a)-(c). In addition, standards for safety, effectiveness, and labeling are established. . . . Id. § 601.25(d). . . .

ABBOT, a ABBOT, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. a, 844 F.2d 1108 (4th Cir. 1988)

. . . . §§ 600.20, 601.1, 601.2, 601.25, 610.1, 620.1-620.7. . . .

GRAHAM, GRAHAM v. WYETH LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a, 666 F. Supp. 1483 (D. Kan. 1987)

. . . . § 601.25. . . .

L. HURLEY, Jr. v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY, 651 F. Supp. 993 (E.D. Tex. 1986)

. . . . § 601.25. . 21 C.F.R. § 211, subpart B. . 21 C.F.R. § 600.20. . 21 C.F.R. § 610, subparts A and B. . . . See, 21 C.F.R., §§ 601.25, 601.26. . . . See, § 601.25(e)(1). (2) Category II: Biological products determined by the panel to be unsafe, ineffective . . . See, § 601.25(e)(2). (3) Category III: Biological products determined by the panel not to fall within . . . See, § 601.25(e)(3). . . .

GENDALIA, N. v. GIOFFRE, J. J. a J. PATAFIO, v. GIOFFRE, J. J. a, 631 F. Supp. 509 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . Fidelibus claims a total of 601.25 days of accumulated time from 1965. . . .

In HENNING d b a, 52 B.R. 350 (Bankr. D.S.D. 1985)

. . . .) $ 601.25 NICHOLIS J. . . .

E. LOGE S. v. UNITED STATES, 662 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 601.25; (7) failing to enact regulations which would assure the safety of trivalent oral polio vaccine . . .

E. LOGE S. v. UNITED STATES, 494 F. Supp. 883 (W.D. Ark. 1980)

. . . . § 601.25; (7) failing to enact regulations which would assure the safety of trivalent oral polio vaccine . . . pleaded that the government is liable for failing to follow the review procedures set out in 21 C.F.R. § 601.25 . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR, v. C. BRENNAN,, 377 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 1979)

. . . Costs in the amount of $601.25 are hereby taxed against the Respondent. It is so ordered. . . .