Florida Statute 601.601 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY

Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 601.601

601.601 Registration of dealers’ agents.—Each licensed citrus fruit dealer shall:

(1) Register with the Department of Agriculture each agent as defined in s. 601.03 who is authorized to represent such dealer; apply for registration of such agent or agents on a form approved by the Department of Agriculture and filed with the Department of Agriculture at least 5 days before the active participation of the agent or agents on behalf of such dealer in any transaction described in s. 601.03; and be held fully liable for and legally bound by all contracts and agreements, verbal or written, involving the consignment, purchase, or sale of citrus fruit executed by a duly registered agent on the dealer’s behalf during the entire period of valid registration of such agent the same as though such contracts or agreements were executed by the dealer. Registration of each agent shall be for the entire shipping season for which the applying dealer’s license is issued; however, a licensed dealer may cancel the registration of any agent registered by her or him by returning the agent’s identification card to the Department of Agriculture and giving formal written notice to the Department of Agriculture of at least 10 days. In addition, such dealer shall make every effort to alert the public to the fact that the agent is no longer authorized to represent her or him. An agent may be registered by more than one licensed dealer for the same shipping season, provided that each licensed dealer applies individually for registration of the agent and further provided that written consent is given by each and every dealer under whose license the agent has valid prior registration.

(2) When the requirements of subsection (1) and such additional requirements set forth by rules adopted by the Department of Citrus for registration of an agent are met and the fee required by s. 601.59(2) is paid, the Department of Agriculture shall duly register the agent and issue an identification card certifying such registration. The identification card, among other things, shall show in a prominent manner:

(a) The name and address of the agent.

(b) The authorizing dealer’s name, address, and license number.

(d)1. A space for signature of the agent.

2. A space to be countersigned by the licensed dealer.

3. A statement providing that the card is not valid unless so signed and countersigned.

The department may periodically adopt, as necessary, additional requirements or conditions relating to the registration of agents.

History.—s. 1, ch. 63-75; s. 1, ch. 65-86; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 7, ch. 71-185; s. 22, ch. 71-186; s. 2, ch. 81-318; s. 2, ch. 83-142; ss. 1, 3, ch. 85-129; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 978, ch. 97-103; s. 47, ch. 2012-182.

F.S. 601.601 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.601 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.601

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.601

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.601.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 601.601

Total Results: 20

Conill-Valdes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-29

Citation: 266 So. 3d 879

Snippet: on the merits. See Dawson v. State , 847 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ; Peterson v. State , 746

Conill-Valdes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-29

Citation: 266 So. 3d 879

Snippet: on the merits. See Dawson v. State , 847 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ; Peterson v. State , 746

ARKHEEM J. LAMB v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-05-02

Citation: 246 So. 3d 400

Snippet: appearance); State v. Cordia, 564 So. 2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (finding that officers’

Rico Johnson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-04-07

Citation: 215 So. 3d 644, 2017 WL 1304954, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4776

Snippet: So.3d at 1229; see State v. Cordia, 564 So.2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (permitting witness to testify

Quaknine v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-13

Citation: 189 So. 3d 290, 2016 WL 1445596, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5619

Snippet: changed his appearance); State v. Cordia, 564 So.2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (finding that officers’

Patrick Albert Evans v. State of Florida Corrected Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-10

Snippet: over the telephone. State v. Cordia, 564 So. 2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); see also Hardie v. State

Patrick Albert Evans v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-11-12

Citation: 177 So. 3d 1219, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 700, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 2538

Snippet: with the defendant. In State v. Cordia, 564 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), the Second District granted

Darnell Razz v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-01-07

Citation: 155 So. 3d 447, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 181

Snippet: appearance); State v. Cordia, 564 So.2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (finding that officers’

Asteberg v. Russell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-08-01

Citation: 144 So. 3d 606, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11778, 2014 WL 3765965

Snippet: 2012); see also Vo v. Bui, 680 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Rule 1.360(a)(1) provides

Alvarez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-01-22

Citation: 147 So. 3d 537, 2014 WL 223080, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 583

Snippet: changed his appearance); State v. Cordia, 564 So.2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (finding that officers’

Valentine v. Van Sickle

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-28

Citation: 42 So. 3d 267, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10854, 2010 WL 2925098

Snippet: living expenses. See Gurney v. Gurney, 804 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). As previously noted, the

Gonzalez v. Tracy

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-10-22

Citation: 994 So. 2d 402, 2008 WL 4643122

Snippet: unrelated disease); Kahler v. Kent, 616 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (reversing the entry of final

Timmons v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-08-01

Citation: 961 So. 2d 378, 2007 WL 2189097

Snippet: subject to Miranda. State v. McAdams, 559 So.2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). See also Allred v. State

Wilson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-28

Citation: 951 So. 2d 1039, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 4544, 2007 WL 911772

Snippet: So.2d at 146 (citing Wilson v. State, 792 So.2d 601, 601-02 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)). The trial judge offered

McCain v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-12-20

Citation: 944 So. 2d 507, 2006 WL 3733322

Snippet: statutory maximum. See Thomas v. State, 909 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); State v. Ayers, 901 So.2d

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-12-02

Citation: 891 So. 2d 474, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 734, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 2168, 2004 WL 2810829

Snippet: Workmen’s Compensation Rules of Procedure, 285 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla.1973). In the 1973 case, the Court reviewed

L.D. v. Department of Children & Family Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-03-24

Citation: 870 So. 2d 235, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3773

Snippet: 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Vo v. Bui, 680 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Gasparino v. Murphy, 352 So

In Re GD

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-03-24

Citation: 870 So. 2d 235, 2004 WL 574022

Snippet: 279 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Vo v. Bui, 680 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Gasparino v. Murphy, 352 So

Olges v. Dougherty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-08-29

Citation: 856 So. 2d 6, 2003 WL 22023663

Snippet: context of the litigation."); Vo v. Bui, 680 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (treating case as involving

Brown v. Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-07-21

Citation: 658 So. 2d 627, 1995 WL 427720

Snippet: the second hearing. Miller v. Miller, 587 So.2d 601, 601 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the