Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 601.61 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 601.61 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 601.61

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XXXV
AGRICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, AND ANIMAL INDUSTRY
Chapter 601
FLORIDA CITRUS CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 601.61
601.61 Bond requirements of citrus fruit dealers.
(1)(a) Except as provided in this section, before the approval of a citrus fruit dealer’s license, the applicant must deliver to the Department of Agriculture a good and sufficient cash bond, an appropriate certificate of deposit, or a surety bond executed by the applicant as principal and by a surety company qualified to do business in this state as surety, in an amount determined by the Department of Citrus pursuant to rules adopted by the department. The rules shall allow the department to consider any of the following factors for determining the amount of such bonds or certificates of deposit: the number of standard-packed boxes of citrus fruit, or the equivalent thereof, that the applicant intends to handle during the term of the license as set forth in the application; the total volume of fruit handled by the dealer the previous season; the highest month’s volume handled the previous season; the anticipated increase in the total citrus crop during the season for which the application for license is made; or other relevant factors.
(b) If a citrus fruit dealer during the term of her or his license finds that she or he has handled, or can reasonably expect to handle, a volume of fruit greater than that covered by a posted bond or certificate of deposit, the dealer has the affirmative duty to immediately notify the Department of Agriculture and initiate a review by the Department of Citrus to determine any increase required in the amount of such bond or certificate of deposit to comply with the department’s rules for determining the amount of such bonds or certificates of deposit.
(2) Such bond shall be in the form approved by the Department of Agriculture and shall be conditioned as provided in s. 601.66(9); to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all contracts, verbal or written, made by the citrus fruit dealer with producers or with other citrus fruit dealers relative to the purchasing, handling, sale, and accounting of purchases and sales of citrus fruit; upon the dealer’s accounting for the proceeds from, and paying for, any citrus fruit purchased or contracted for in accordance with the terms of the contracts with producers; and upon the dealer’s accounting for any advance payments or deposits made, and delivering all citrus fruit contracted for, in accordance with the terms of the contracts with other citrus fruit dealers. The commission may prescribe by rule that such a producer contract contain information that it considers necessary to protect the producer from deceptive practices. For purposes of this chapter, every such contract shall be conclusively deemed to have been made and entered into during the shipping season in which the delivery of fruit into the primary channel of trade is made.
(3) Such bond shall be to the Department of Agriculture for the use and benefit of every producer and of every citrus fruit dealer with whom the dealer deals in the purchase, handling, sale, and accounting of purchases and sales of citrus fruit. The aggregate accumulative liability under any bond may not exceed the amount of the bond. Such bond shall provide that the surety company executing the bond is not liable to any citrus fruit dealer claiming to be injured or damaged by such dealer if the aggregate of the amounts found to be due to producers pursuant to this chapter equals or exceeds the amount of the bond, unless such citrus fruit dealer is also a producer and is acting in the capacity of a producer and not in the capacity of a citrus fruit dealer in the transaction wherein she or he claims to have been injured or damaged by applicant; however, if the aggregate of such amounts is less than the amount of the bond, the surety may be held liable to such citrus fruit dealers, but not in excess of the sum by which the amount of the bond exceeds the aggregate of the amounts found to be due to producers pursuant to this chapter.
(4) The Department of Citrus or the Department of Agriculture, or any officer or employee designated by the Department of Citrus or the Department of Agriculture, is authorized to inspect such accounts and records of any citrus fruit dealer as may be deemed necessary to determine whether a bond that has been delivered to the Department of Agriculture is in the amount required by this section or whether a previously licensed nonbonded dealer should be required to furnish bond. If any such citrus fruit dealer refuses to permit such inspection, the Department of Agriculture may publish the facts and circumstances and by order suspend the license of the offender until permission to make such inspection is given. Upon a finding by the Department of Agriculture that any citrus fruit dealer has dealt or probably will deal with more fruit during the season than shown by the application, the Department of Agriculture may order such bond increased to such an amount as will meet the requirements set forth in the rules adopted by the Department of Citrus for determining the amount of such bonds. Upon failure to file such increased bond within the time fixed by the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Agriculture may publish the facts and circumstances and by order suspend the license of such citrus fruit dealer until such bond is increased as ordered.
(5)(a) The following citrus fruit, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the Department of Citrus, is not considered fruit with which the applicant intends to deal for the purpose of determining the amount of the bond required under subsection (1):
1. Citrus fruit that the applicant produces.
2. Citrus fruit that is handled for its members by a cooperative marketing association organized and existing under chapter 618 or chapter 619.
3. Fresh citrus fruit handled by the applicant that has been prepared and packaged by a registered packinghouse other than the applicant and has been inspected and certified for shipment.
4. Citrus fruit handled by the applicant from citrus groves for which the applicant provides complete grove management services under direct contract with the owner or producer.
5. Citrus fruit handled by a corporate or partnership applicant that is from citrus groves owned by officers or stockholders of the corporation or from citrus groves owned by the partnership, the parent corporation, or a wholly owned subsidiary corporation or its corporate officers or stockholders, or any partner of a partnership, if appropriate waivers of right to any claim against the bond required to be posted by this section are attached to and made a part of the license application.
6. Processed citrus fruit handled by the applicant that has been processed and packaged by a registered citrus processing plant other than the applicant and has been inspected and certified for shipment.
(b) If the applicant does not intend to deal with any citrus fruit other than that described in paragraph (a), the Department of Agriculture shall issue a license without the posting of a bond. Such a license shall bear a descriptive statement to the effect that the licensee is not a bonded citrus fruit dealer.
(c) A claim against any citrus fruit dealer’s bond required to be posted by this section shall not be accepted with respect to any damages in connection with fruit handled under subparagraphs (a)1.-6. if such claim is filed against the bond of the dealer who was granted bond exempt status for such fruit.
History.s. 61, ch. 25149, 1949; s. 21, ch. 26492, 1951; s. 2, ch. 28197, 1953; s. 1, ch. 29762, 1955; s. 1, ch. 61-45; s. 1, ch. 61-389; s. 1, ch. 63-61; ss. 1, 2, ch. 65-73; ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 7, ch. 71-185; s. 22, ch. 71-186; ss. 1, 2, 3, ch. 73-199; s. 1, ch. 75-102; s. 2, ch. 78-100; s. 2, ch. 81-318; ss. 1, 3, ch. 85-129; s. 4, ch. 91-429; s. 979, ch. 97-103; s. 3, ch. 98-41; s. 48, ch. 2012-182; s. 97, ch. 2013-15.

F.S. 601.61 on Google Scholar

F.S. 601.61 on Casetext

Amendments to 601.61


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 601.61
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 601.61.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BRIDALANE FASHIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 32 F. Supp. 2d 466 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Of the $114,722.30 “loss of revenue” demanded by the Customs Service, plaintiff alleges only $601.61 . . .

v., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 1064 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . Of the $114,722.30 “loss of revenue” demanded by the Customs Service, plaintiff alleges only $601.61 . . .

In DAVIS, FAMILY FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN, v. A. DAVIS, Jr., 172 B.R. 437 (Bankr. D.D.C. 1994)

. . . a) because it presented the check for collection approximately two weeks after it received the $13,-601.61 . . .

J. A. STEPHENS, v. VISTA PACKING COMPANY,, 634 So. 2d 234 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Section 601.61(2), Florida Statutes (1989), states that “[f]or purposes of this chapter, every such contract . . . Accordingly, pursuant to section 601.61(2), the contract was made, and appellant’s indebtedness incurred . . .

In BARRETT B. BARRETT, v. COMMONWEALTH FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION J. D., 113 B.R. 175 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1990)

. . . claims of CFSLA and Gunn, only a claim of the City of Philadelphia, $161.72 of which is secured and $601.61 . . .

In CARLTON FRUIT COMPANY, CARLTON FRUIT COMPANY, v. STATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS,, 86 B.R. 254 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . . § 601.61 also provides that the dealer applying for the license must post a bond with the Department . . . Services in the sum of $100,000, which, as noted earlier, is the maximum bond permitted by Fla.Stat. § 601.61 . . .

M. WERNER, v. UNITED STATES v. ALESI, 374 F. Supp. 558 (D. Conn. 1974)

. . . Judgment against the United States in the amount of $601.61, without interest, may accordingly enter . . .

GULF AMERICAN FIRE CASUALTY COMPANY, a v. E. N. DAVIS, GENERAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. E. N. DAVIS,, 172 So. 2d 636 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . the amount of $10,000 executed by it as principal and by the defendant Gulf as surety pursuant to § 601.61 . . . called upon to determine the date a bond of a licensed citrus fruit dealer, executed pursuant to § 601.61 . . . is made to the Florida Citrus Commission by supplying the information required by § 601.56, F.S.A. § 601.61 . . . from August first of one year to July thirty-first of the following year.” § 601.03 (33), F.S.A. § 601.61 . . . For the above reasons we hold that a surety bond given as a condition for a license under § 601.61, F.S.A . . .

H. v., 25 B.T.A. 418 (B.T.A. 1932)

. . . 250 of its preferred shares, having a par value of $12,500, which was accepted at that value, and $601.61 . . .

PENNSYLVANIA STEEL CO. v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO., 225 F. 106 (S.D.N.Y. 1915)

. . . The two items of this claim aggregating $601.61 are allowed. Sheridan Company (170). . . .